Far too many Tennessee Democrats, including me from time to time, have been disappointed with the voting record of our United States Senate nominee Harold Ford, Jr. He has been characterized as too conservative, even "Republican-lite" by his home team.

But let's step back for a minute and look at some of the progressive legislation Congressman Ford has sponsored:

  • H.R.1383 : To direct the President to transmit to the Congress each year a comprehensive report on the national homeland security strategy of the United States. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.922 : To improve treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder for veterans of service in Afghanistan and Iraq and the war on terrorism. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.887: Provides $150 per year in postal benefits for mail sent to soldiers overseas who are on active duty in armed conflict or in a military hospital as a result of injury sustained in such conflict. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.1561 : To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the incentives for adoption. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.1643 : To amend various banking laws to combat predatory lending, particularly in regards to low and moderate income individuals, and for other purposes. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.3296 : To authorize the Secretary of Education to make grants to States and local educational agencies for hiring and training prekindergarten teachers. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.4459 : To provide tuition assistance to undergraduate students in exchange for the performance of National service. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.3297 : To extend Federal funding for operation of State high risk health insurance pools. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.3796 : To establish the AmeriCorps Disaster Relief Corps to carry out national service projects that address the needs arising from the consequences of Hurricane Katrina, and other major disasters and emergencies. Status: referred to committee.

And here is some of the legislation co-sponsored by Congressman Ford:

  • H.RES.688 : Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that legislation and conference reports be available on the Internet for 72 hours before consideration by the House, and for other purposes. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.RES.841 : Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require committees to hold hearings upon the issuance of certain reports from an Inspector General or the Comptroller General the subject matter of which is within the jurisdiction of such committees. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.115 : To strengthen the national security through the expansion and improvement of foreign language study, and for other purposes. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.197 : To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a State to charge in-State tuition rates to active-duty members of the Armed Forces domiciled or stationed on active duty in that State and to the dependents of such members. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.292 : To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the amount of the military death gratuity from $12,000 to $100,000. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.871 : To establish reporting requirements relating to funds made available for military operations in Iraq or the reconstruction of Iraq and for military operations in Afghanistan or the reconstruction of Afghanistan, and for other purposes. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.616 : To provide for reduction in the backlog of claims for benefits pending with the Department of Veterans Affairs. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.838 : To ensure that the reserve components are able to maintain adequate retention and recruitment levels by protecting the financial security of the families of activated members of the National Guard and of the Reserve. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.376 : To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate fair prices for Medicare prescription drugs on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.519 : To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the allowance of the deduction of State and local general sales taxes in lieu of State and local income taxes permanent. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.550 : To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require a voter-verified permanent paper record or hard copy under title III of such Act, and for other purposes. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.226 : To strengthen and expand scientific and technological education capabilities of associate-degree-granting colleges through the establishment of partnership arrangements with bachelor-degree-granting institutions. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.759 : To provide for a program of scientific research on abrupt climate change, to accelerate the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States by establishing a market-driven system of greenhouse gas tradeable allowances that will limit greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, reduce dependence upon foreign oil, and ensure benefits to consumers from the trading in such allowances. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.R.810 : To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for human embryonic stem cell research. Status: vetoed by President Bush.

And while we can all criticize Congressman Ford's position on divisive issues such as gay marriage or his position on silly non-issues such as flag burning, here are other Constitutional amendments he has co-sponsored:

  • H.J.RES.28 : Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding the right to vote. Status: referred to committee.
  • H.J.RES.29 : Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding the right of all citizens of the United States to a public education of equal high quality. Status: referred to committee.

Perhaps Democrats should keep in mind that most of the conservative measures Congressman Ford and other Democrats voted to support would have passed anyway in our Republican controlled Congress, with or without moderate Democrat votes.

But in a perfect, bi-partisan world, Democrats who side with Republicans on some issues would get something in return. Instead, the Republican Party, led by our "uniter not a divider" president, is drunk with the power they have used to bully Americans for six years now. They are interested in only one thing: furthering their divisive, destructive agenda.

Take a look at the status of the legislation sponsored or co-sponsored by Congressman Ford. Perhaps Ford's voting record would be more to the liking of progressive, left-leaning Democrats if he and others in Congress were given an opportunity to actually vote on progressive legislation.

Sadly, in our present Republican controlled government this will not happen. Under President Clinton, America enjoyed eight years of unprecedented growth, peace, and prosperity, even with a Republican controlled Congress.

President Clinton's "triangulation" strategy represented the simple, time-honored deal of "give a little to get a little," something that is not working for Democrats in Congress under the Bush regime. The difference is that we had a built-in check on GOP power sitting in the White House. President Clinton vetoed 37 bills, and was only overridden twice. In his six years in office, President Bush has only vetoed one bill (HR810 supporting stem-cell research).

Harold Ford, Jr. has been trying to tell Tennessee voters this for months, but we are too distracted by bimbos and bigotry and terrorists lurking in the bushes to pay attention, thanks to the unprecedented nastiness of the GOP smear campaign brought to you by people with no ideas and too much money to fund their lust for power.

If Bob Corker is elected, you can expect more rubber-stamp approval of Bush administration policies for the benefit of big business and corporations, while sending progressive, "by the people for the people" legislation to die in committee. You can expect further lack of support for veterans, health care, education, accountability and transparency in government, fair elections, and all the things that we value as Americans.

The only way to fix our present government is to elect a Democratic majority to the United States Senate and House of Representatives. This coming Tuesday, the Volunteers of the Great State of Tennessee can help by voting for Harold Ford Jr. for Senate.

It is time for Democrats and patriotic Republicans to expose the corruption and failures of bad government and put an end to it. It is time for Democrats and all Americans on the left, in the middle, and on the right to stand together against the divisive Republican administration and their enablers in Congress. We can sort out the rest of it starting in January. I trust Harold Ford Jr. to help start the healing process. You should, too. And you should tell five other people. And tell them to go vote, and to vote for Harold Ford Jr. for United States Senate.

I am R. Neal and I approve this message.

Number9's picture

Do not play with the Constitution, it is not a toy

I don't understand why the Jesse Jackson Jr. reintroduced Constitutional Amendments are good for this country. Can anyone explain why these proposed amendments should be in the U.S. Constitution? Does this not show a disrespect of the Constitution? What next, a Constitutional Amendment to require government sponsored health care? Actually it is one of the eight amendments.

It is attempts like this to politicize the Constitution that create great distrust of the judgement of the Democrat Party. Do any of these reach the threshold to be a Constitutional Amendment?

Why is it not enough that if approved they just be a law? I do not understand how being a sponsor of any of these proposed amendments shows good judgement.

Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., in addition to introducing his Voting Rights Amendment - which had 54 original co-sponsors and now has a total of 56 co-sponsors - reintroduced eight other amendments last week pertaining to: the right to a public education of equal high quality (H.J. Res. 29) - which had 31 original co-sponsors and now has 32 co-sponsors; the right to health care of equal high quality (H.J. Res. 30) - which had 28 original co-sponsors and now has 30 co-sponsors; equal rights for women (H.J. Res. 31); the right to decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing (H.J. Res. 32); the right to a clean, safe, and sustainable environment (H.J. Res. 33); taxing the people of the United States progressively (H.J. Res. 34); the right to full employment and balanced economic growth (H.J. Res. 35); and an amendment to eliminate the Electoral College and elect our President and Vice President through the direct vote of a majority of the American people (H.J. Res. 36).

"H. J. Res. 30 is getting a big boost this Congress because the distinguished Congressman Pete Stark (D-CA-13) has agreed to 'take the bull by the horns' with regard to the health care amendment. As the ranking Democrat of the Subcommittee on Health of the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Stark is strongly identified with high quality health care for all Americans and was eager to lead a campaign to add co-sponsors to the bill.

"We are concentrating on building support among members of Congress for three of the nine amendments introduced - the right to vote (H.J. Res. 28), and the right to a public education (H.J. Res. 29) and health care (H.J. Res. 30) of equal high quality.

"I believe most Americans think they either already have some or all of these rights or think they should have these rights in their Constitution - but they don't! So we will continue to educate the American people as to why it is important to put these rights in the Constitution, and continue to build support for them among members of Congress," Jackson concluded.

 
 
 

 

 

 

R. Neal's picture

Some of those might be over

Some of those might be over the top. But we are talking about Harold Ford Jr. and two of those. Are you saying you are against the right to vote and against equal quality public education for all kids?

Oh, the reason some might think these amendments are needed is because the 14th Amendment doesn't seem to be working.

Number9's picture

This does not reach Constitutional muster.

Are you saying you are against the right to vote and against equal quality public education for all kids?

Oh, the reason some might think these amendments are needed is because the 14th Amendment doesn't seem to be working.

How many laws are there on the books that ensure the right to vote and provide for equal education? Enforce the law.

Only in the time we live in is the thought process that if the law is not enforced the solution is to create more laws.

Are you suggesting the best course of action is a United States Constitution Amendment? I don't understand that reasoning. If I where undecided, which I am not, this would have made the decision for me.

If there is a place in this country where people cannot vote, their votes are changed, or there are additional votes, then many local and state felonies have been committed. Arrest, try, and prosecute those found guilty that commit voter fraud. Leave the Constitution alone. This does not reach Constitutional muster.

The Constitution is not a toy. Those that treat it with such disregard should not be in office.

R. Neal's picture

Are you suggesting the best

Are you suggesting the best course of action is a United States Constitution Amendment?

No, simply pointing out that Harold Ford Jr. isn't just about "flag burning" amendments (which I definitely don't think we need).

Leave the Constitution alone. This does not reach Constitutional muster.

I suppose you would have opposed the 14th Amendment, too. I don't think the framers envisioned a Constitution carved in stone. That's why they allowed for amending it. What they didn't envision was an unchecked government violating the Constitution at their whim.

Anyway, I'm not advocating for any particular amendments. Just pointing out that Ford supports amendments for things like equal rights in voting and education as a reminder that he's not the right-wing ogre some make him out to be.

Unfortunately, he also supports taking away rights for a class of people. On balance, though, I suspect that he and others sign on to such nonsense for political reasons (because sadly that is what voters in the state of Tennessee want) knowing full well that such an amendment never has a chance of being ratified for the very reasons you cite.

What about the other bills? Do you not support making the VA provide benefits to veterans they have been promised? Do you not support transparency and accountability in government?

As for influencing your vote, people with your views probably aren't going to be happy with a Senator Ford. I am talking to Democrats who want checks and balances and oversight and a better society with equal opportunity and liberty and justice for all (including gays and flag burners).

Number9's picture

As for influencing your

As for influencing your vote, people with your views probably aren't going to be happy with a Senator Ford. I am talking to Democrats who want checks and balances and oversight and a better society with equal opportunity and liberty and justice for all (including gays and flag burners).

I talk to all people regardless of their partisanship. I don't have a filter on who I talk to.

I hope when you reference "people with your views" you are referring to people who want to defend the Constitution.

R. Neal's picture

I talk to all people

#9 says: I talk to all people regardless of their partisanship.

Well, that's good to know. Unfortunately, I suspect that a lot of those people are listening to Lloyd Daughtery's (sp?) radio show, and they don't strike me as Ford voters so much.

At any rate, I'm a little surprised that you are able to see and accurately analyze the chess game that is going on in local Knox County politics vis-a-vis Ragsdale v. Harber/Lumpy/et. al., but you have a blind spot when it comes to Ford's political maneuverings.

Do you honestly think that a Constitution amendment introduced by Jesse Jackson Jr. has a snowball's chance of even being voted on? Much less ratified? (Need I remind viewers, once again, of the Equal Rights Amendment?)

This is pure political pandering to both sides, for good or ill, for political purposes by any means necessary and all that, but by no means anything that will mean anything in the big scheme of things. Except to get you and others to go on record as dodging the question whether you support voting rights and a good education for all Americans. I think we would agree that this is a sad state of affairs, but it is what it is and here we are, and Ford is playing his somewhat weak hand (being in Tennessee and all) in a very smart way.

I'm guessing that the people you talk to have already figured this out, one way or the other. Time to pick a route and get on the bus or get left behind at the station. Heh.

Andy Axel's picture

Stil, nice try...

...to change the subject to Jesse Jackson Jr.

It is attempts like this to politicize the Constitution that create great distrust of the judgement of the Democrat Party.

Just who keeps putting flag burning amendment on the agenda? Or talked about codifying bigotry with a Constitutional Amendment to ban gay marriage?

3-D Jesus on a haywagon.

____________________________

You can live a batter life, or a butter life. Or both, if you choose.

CE Petro's picture

R. this is a great resource.

R. this is a great resource. It still baffles me why the Ford campaign has not used much of this, but has stuck to defending against Corker/RNC claims. Personally, I believe Ford's stance on perscription drugs and the oil companies will resonate the most with voters.

Still, there are issues that Ford is on the opposite side of the fence from me (and on the same side of the fence as Corker), and which he does not clarify the falsehoods perpetuated the religious-right and GOP-myths.

For example, Ford is most definately against abortion, and when the RNC ads proclaimed he approved the morning after "abotifacient" pill to be distributed in schools, he never, ever, to my knowledge, clarified that the morning after pill is NOT an abortifacient. In fact his ad only says that "he has never voted to give girls the abortion pill". It burns me up every time I hear it, because it does not address the falsehood put forth by the RNC and Corker, and the religious right in the first damn place.

yes, I am pointing to a highly divisive issue, but one that has been kept alive based on myths instead of science. If he's against abortion, that's his deal, and I won't discourage his opinion. But he should not be perpetuating the myths used to justify returning to pre-Roe. It does a huge disservice to the people. Then there is Ford's homophobia issue.

While many tolerant folks may feel these are divisive issues, we also need to recognize that his stance has a very real, and very negative impact on the very people he may serve.

While I have already voted for Ford, in an attempt for the dems to control the senate, I still have my doubts that he can be brought "into the party fold" on a number of social issues. That I find just as scary as a Corker in.

R. Neal's picture

Great points, C.E. On the

Great points, C.E.

On the homophobia, I agree this is pretty disgraceful, especially for a guy who has no doubt experienced discrimination himself because of his race and in light of the long African-American struggle for civil rights. I wonder though if a) this isn't just political calculus (writing off a relatively small number of voters and sympathizers to curry favor among a far larger number of rabid right-wingers and Dixiecrats, not that that's any excuse) and/or b) overreaction to the early whisper campaigns that he might be gay because he's single. (Corker helped him out on that one with the bimbo ad. Heh.)

On abortion, Harold Ford Jr. says he is against it (presumably on moral/religious grounds) but whenever he is asked about it he has never wavered from saying that medical procedures involving a woman's choices should not be criminalized. He has also co-sponsored legislation to reduce the number of abortions by 95% in ten years, something his "culture of life" opponents have not seemed too interested in actually accomplishing despite their rhetoric.

CE Petro's picture

If that's the case...

On the homophobia issue, in either case that you present, Ford is not defining the rules of engagment, but puts himself in a constant position to defend himself. As we saw from the Kerry debacle (swiftboaters) defensiveness does not win over voters. From what Egalia posted earlier this week, Ford has lost/is losing a portion of the LGBT community. While that may be a small group, compared to the voting populous, in a tight race* it could make all the difference. (*Note: and I'm not yet buying into the media touted poll showing Corker 10 points ahead)

As far as the abortion issue, realistically, I don't think we will ever see abortion completely gone. I really believe it is a statement that some moderates use to justify feeling like they are sitting on the fence, very similar to the "I wouldn't have an abortion, but I won't take that choice away from others" belief (and some women truly feel that way). My point, though, is that these two sentiments are bandied about to detract from the reality that women have had abortions (as well as used contraceptives) from time immemorial, and will continue to do so, whether it is legal or not.

As far as how how he want's to get to that rate, we will definately not see that happen. Comprehensive sexual education is only a start, but he doesn't even say that he advocates that. What the hell is "character education" going to teach youngsters about sexuality and safe sex? Abstinence Only has been a collosal failure. And I can't imagine supporting having a young woman's grandmother imprisioned for up to a year, because she felt more comfortable going to granny than to mommy and daddy, or was afraid that daddy would beat her, yet Ford did. While many, many young women do go to their parents, there is a segment that, for whatever reason that is totally real to them, can't. supporting that law was divisive, and completely ignored the circumstances that some young women will find themselves in. But, aside from that, there was a KNS article quite a while ago, now, which quoted a judge (western part of TN) who was the only one that heard judicial bypasses. It stuck in my mind, because he said most of the cases he heard were young women that felt (rightly or wrongly) telling their parents they were pregnant would irreparibly harm their relationship. i thought that was pretty interesting.

I don't want to get into a issue by issue showdown, just wanted to make some points. Basically, though, the legislation Ford has supported will not get to that "end 95% of abortions in 10 years." Instead it has created the means for some very ugly things to happen. (young women douching with bleach, for instance)

Overall, the "culture of life" people have no regard for the living, otherwise regressive laws would not have been put in place chipping away at medical procedures that women use and need. Nor would they have taken away medical procedures from immigrent's children, like basic immunizations. Imagine the health hazards that law will now create. But that is a whole other post.

R. Neal's picture

C.E. as always I respect and

C.E. as always I respect and appreciate your thoughts.

One clarification. The "95%" bill is certainly (and overly) ambitious, but it does not say anything about abstinence only (or "character education", which is something Ford has cooked up on his own). It mostly deals with better prenatal health care and better insurance coverage for infants, counseling and support for women who choose adoption, protecting pregnant women from domestic abuse, and the general overall well being of women who decide to carry to term.

Otherwise, I pretty much agree with you on the abortion issue and our failed approach to it, but I'm not sure Ford is as strongly anti-abortion as he is portrayed.

spintrep's picture

Senate in the balance

earth Senate in the balance

I still can't get past the possibility that HFJ's campaign and what I perceive as "blowing it" could end up being the diff in the Senate for the next term. I'll salvage what I can if turns true, but it sort of reminds of Gore in 2000. (blame Tennessee)

Why didn't HFJ keep it on a path of only offering positives and play the change card all the way. Let the Corker campaign (and GOP) flail with negative stuff, just letting DNC battle the negatives?

Poise, strong message, seizing the opportunities to look and sound REAL with his amazing oratory skills. Watching and listening to him has at times been electrifying when he's on message with hope and delivering that versatile battery of knowledge and understanding of issues. Finding more situations where he's connecting and can show more humor... that's been lacking in these latest rounds of interviews and ads that I've noticed.
(HFJ: "If I had a dog, he'd probably kick him too." was that worth it?)

Point: He looked good going aggressive on the issues, not so much when defending himself or going after his opponent.

Now with only 2 days left, mostly posturing, probably too late.
I hope he approves this message.

(Late edit: anyone else finding these votevets.org ads compelling? wish they had shown up sooner?)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives