Sun
Aug 26 2007
06:33 am

Watching FRed Thompson's speech on C-Span last night, I had to snicker a bit when I noticed that the blurb beneath his name keep flip-flopping. One minute it said "Fred Thompson, presidential candidate---then, a few minutes later another blurb was put up that said--"Fred Thompson is expected to announce his candidacy sometime in September."

I guess in Thompson's case, it's possible to have it both ways, but I felt kind of funny about him being given the same platform as the people who have already announced. In reality he is not a candidate. He just might be.

Read more...
I wasn't all that impressed with Thompson's ideas or his delivery, though for some inexplicable reason the audience frequently applauded. The candidate (or potential candidate) brought up the standard Republican concerns--fear--too much government, that sort of thing. Mostly I think he was trying to showcase himself as a candidate who would bring Congress together and provide the country with a leader. Somehow though he didn't appear to be much of a leader. He looked old and somehow already weary.

Because Thompson was only discussing things in the most general terms, the essence of his thoughts and plans didn't take hold. It was as if all he had to do was be there and people got excited. I suppose this could be due to all the favorable press he has received comparing him to R. Reagan or because of his history as a Tenn. senator. I wasn't living in TN at the time, so I have no idea what kind of governor he was and what policies he worked towards that would qualify him to be president.

I have to admit to having a gut feeling of distrust for Thompson right from the start. The way he handled his entry into the race didn't exactly make him look like an up-front guy. His appearances, including the one where he had to be told to "pay attention" to the crowd, so far haven't sparked my interest at all. So what's all the big fuss over this guy?

If it's because he's an old timey type candidate from the South, that's enough to send chills down my spine. What with all the charges concerning backroom deals and nepotism floating around here lately, it would seem the last thing we need is someone who spends most of his time planning his campaign behind the scenes rather than offering strong and wise ways he would solve this country's problems.

It will be interesting to see the Fred Thompson campaign evolve. One thing in his favor is the lacksluster roster of competitors he has to face. McCain is too old and a re-run. Romney too slick and fey. Guiliani will prove to be too cold-hearted and cuffed to a number of questionable characters from his past. This could give Thompson an edge, but put him on stage with any of the Democratic candidates, and I think he will look like a vaccum cleaner salesman trying to get you to commit to buying an Electrolux.

Thompson's pitch seemed outmoded, but then the race has just begun. Well, then again, for him, it hasn't even started yet has it? He probably will...he might..he is expected to announce...

When? That's anybody's guess.

Topics:
Johnny Ringo's picture

Ain't it a bit early?

It IS early here, and I don't have the time or energy to actually research this, but afaik there's never been a Presidential election that got started as early as this one has. If you look at the matter historically, is it all that unusual for a candidate not to officially announce more than a year before the general election? For example, Wesley Clark didn't annouce his candidacy until September 17, 2003. So maybe Thompson's delay really only seems unusual because of the unusually early start to this race.

What bothers me is the race by the various states to move their primaries forward on the calandar in order to maintain their "relevance." Pretty soon we may be in the sort of permanent election cycle that Congressmen find themselves in. I can just see it - folks announcing their intentions to run in the immediate aftermath of a Presidential inauguration. Blah.

Winghunter's picture

The only possible reason

The only possible reason someone with internet access doesn't know Fred was never a governor of TN or understand why everyone around him/her fully appreciates what he's saying is if they just simply refuse to. So, here's a few clues;

Fredipedia
(link...)

ABC Radio Network Transcripts of Fred Dalton Thompson
(link...)

It's elementary my dear Borges!

Carole Borges's picture

Ha ha...thanks for catching that Winghunter..

I meant mayor of course...

No really I knew he was a Senator.

vldogs's picture

Carole: Your post seems to

Carole: Your post seems to give the impression that we would be better off with the Democrats. I truly believe that when we change parties, we just change the names of the crooks. Both parties are full of it. Since we ONLY have two choices, I would rather support the republican crooks; the democrats are too socialist and wanting to take my freedoms away to fast. They always think they know what's best for me. They don't have a clue. I need to make decisions for me, and I don't want the government making them for me. I can take care of my own financing, retirement, health care, et al better than any politician can. There's NOTHING that government can do better but have an army to protect us.

bizgrrl's picture

There's NOTHING that

There's NOTHING that government can do better but have an army to protect us.

Just an army? What about roads, postal service, the FDIC, FDA? Just a few other services that would never be available from the private sector.

Andy Axel's picture

Republicans protect your

Republicans protect your freedom? OK. Whatever.

The matrix has you.

____________________________

I'm a guy in a Reagan mask -- and I'm running for President!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives