Serious question. Every statement after the first sentence in this letter to the editor is factually incorrect.

What is the purpose of printing it? Is it satire, and I just didn't get it? Is it to showcase the ignorance of the region? Is it to humiliate the writer? Is there supposed to be entertainment value in that? Is it part of a disinformation campaign to promote an agenda?

The KNS is proud of the effort they make to verify the identify of letter writers. Why don't they make similar efforts to verify the information contained in the letters?

Maybe they should put an editor's note after the letter stating "everything that guy just said is bullshit."

EricLykins's picture

(and no, the Metropulse is

(and no, the Metropulse is not competition given recent rumors about the Big Paper telling the Little Paper to behave).

What about the rumor via someone in Nashville that the little paper could be folded in with the entertainment section of the big paper?

gonzone's picture

"My momma always said 'stupid

"My momma always said 'stupid is as stupid does'". - Forrest Gump

I'm not surprised at all. East TN elected Stacey Campfield!

Hildegard's picture

I think that letter's value

I think that letter's value is in its depressing representation of the mentality of a large percentage of the population of this region. Obviously letters are opinion only and not presented as facts. And I'm not even talking about the content of the letter - just the level of know-nothing ignorance that is pretty much in control of this area. To tie this in with Campfield - there's a reason why guys like him keep getting elected all over the state, and this letter is a shining (or dimming) illustration of why.

And I don't think there's anything that can be done about it. When that guy's house is knocked down by a mudslide caused by deforestation, mountain topping and overdevelopment, and gets sick from all the frozen popcorn shrimp he ate that was contaminated by Pacific radiation and low pH level microorganisms that are killing the ocean thanks to elevated carbon levels, he'll be looking for miraculous images of Jesus in his mail order 2% gold laminated "collector's coin" from Liberty Gold.

There is absolutely no hope for this region. That's why progressive people huddle in groups downtown and in book circles - the comfort of a few but ultimately impotent like minds.

/rant out

F-Stop's picture

Beautiful :heart:

Beautiful :heart:

Consider yourself cubed

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

There is absolutely no hope for this region.

Personally, Hilde, I have some hope due to folks like you, especially given how well you can turn a phrase.

Looking forward to reading your own letter in that space soon. Please, please take a deep breath and write it?

There's work to be done!

Factchecker's picture

Misspelled fluorescent too

I don't know if it makes it more or less sad, but I don't think it's at all limited to this region, though that mentality (or lack of) is certainly strong here. Isn't this "solar energy doesn't work" meme a national one hugely popular now with Rush, The National Review, Fox News, and on and on? I'm surprised the person interrupted his (I'm guessing not a her) diet of fear and ignorance to pen his own "thoughts" on the matter.

Rachel's picture

My in-laws used to live in

My in-laws used to live in Lafayette, La. You think the stuff in the KNS is bad - you should have spent ten minutes with the local paper there.

Yowza.

Somebody's picture

Misinformation fodder for SuperPACs

"Isn't this 'solar energy doesn't work' meme a national one hugely popular now with Rush, The National Review, Fox News, and on and on?"

If that's the case, it would be consistent with the idea of a disinformation campaign laying the groundwork for a campaign to use Solyndra as a means to attack President Obama in the general election. How better to make the particulars of the Solyndra case moot, than to have already established in people's minds that solar doesn't work anyway? Then, whether or not the administration actually mishandled anything in the Solyndra case doesn't matter: Solyndra is solar, solar doesn't work, therefore, the whole thing was a boondoggle from the start.

Put that argument in the hands of an unaccountable SuperPAC, and you've got a real doozy on your hands.

At this point, the only hedge against the effect of SuperPAC misinformation is 1) vigorous fact-checking, and 2) a concerted and coordinated effort to get television and radio stations to refuse to run ads that are proven to contain verifiably false information. The only defense against well-funded misinformation will be rapid response.

That's going to be hard, because these SuperPAC ads are going to be a huge windfall for broadcast media. They're going to want to take the money and ask questions later. They will defend their actions by saying the only way they can remain neutral is to not police any ads at all, or to police them only after the fact, once the fog has cleared (and the election is over).

Is there anyone out there coordinating an effort to do this already?

rikki's picture

Is there anyone out there

Is there anyone out there coordinating an effort to do this already?

Yep. Politifact.

Somebody's picture

That's only half of the

That's only half of the equation. I'm asking if anyone is going to spearhead an effort to ask TV stations not to air ads that have been proven to be factually in error. It's probably a lost cause, but maybe there's some way to push that.

The other hope would be that the unrestrained ads will quickly get so ridiculous that they simply become parodies of themselves., and voters will start rejecting all of them out of hand.

rikki's picture

There was an interesting

There was an interesting exchange among journalists a couple weeks back when the NYT ombudsman openly asked readers whether they felt the paper should factcheck statements made during debates and in political ads. Newspapers have a hard enough time factchecking in articles where the information is the subject, and many feel that when a political event or candidate is the subject, they should just report what is said, not analyze it.

I think journalists should always aspire to provide understanding, but that's an ideal, not something that can be promised.

One of the significant accomplishments of Republican propagandists has been badly blurring the line between factual statements and opinions, to the point where being demonstrably wrong (as Campfield is regarding heterosexual AIDS risks) is often viewed as merely "having a different opinion." I would guess that many media outlets fear their readers/viewers have too poor a grasp on what is factual and what is a matter of opinion for reporters to correct erroneous statements without pissing off their audience. Obviously, if factchecking politicians were to become the norm, Republicans would be getting called on bullshit more often than politicians in other parties, not just because a greater portion of their ideology is corrupt, but because they keep lying after they get caught.

adanovi's picture

The entire notion of making a

The entire notion of making a fact an "opinion" is very disturbing. Everything has become "a matter of opinion" from climate change, to evolution, to energy sources, to history content in textbooks. It is so irritating to have a conversation with someone about whether or not they "believe in" ________(fill in the blank: evolution, global warming, alternative energy, public education, connection between health issues like diabetes and food deserts)________. Everything, every issue has been turned into this bizarre conversation of "having a different opinion." It is extremely dangerous to our nation, our democracy, and our economy. I literally had a conversation with someone the other day who told me he'd never heard anyone try to defend the "theory of the scientific method" to him before. The conversation emerged from a point of discussion about the economy, the occupy protesters, and the lack of jobs for recent college graduates. From there it became a discussion about monkeys and evolution and then he asked me to defend the "theory of the scientific method."

When everything is turned into an opinion or a religious like belief, and, we don't have a common agreement for facts or even the societal knowledge base to comprehend and support the facts, then our society is in a dangerous and vulnerable position of being influenced by only a powerful few who know the facts, hold the power, and have the money to manipulate people and the information for the personal gain of the rich and powerful!

Factchecker's picture

Hey, lookit us!!!!

Back to the question, I have no idea...

F-Stop's picture

"Showcase the ignorance of

"Showcase the ignorance of the region"

Awesome. Simply awesome. I'm picturing a bunch of buck toothed hillbillies sitting atop a NASCAR coming out of a cornucopia.

redmondkr's picture

I started to send all of

I started to send all of y'all this video Christmas card last month, but I thought it would be in poor taste. It seems to fit here though. Please note the line about the tree leaning to the right.

Tess's picture

Wampler's Sausage

The letter writer is from Lenoir City...has he not heard Ted Wampler championing solar panels?

Ted claims that he is saving $150K a year on utilities since the solar panels were installed at the Lenoir City plant.

(link...)

R. Neal's picture

Wampler is clearly a liar

Wampler is clearly a liar because the sun doesn't shine here enough for solar panels work and they won't run a light bulb or an air conditioner. /snark

Factchecker's picture

...on Fox Business, Chris

...on Fox Business, Chris Horner of the Competitive Enterprise Institute claimed that the solar companies “are not responding to demand – they are providing something that doesn’t work.”

Fox’s Neil Cavuto hosted Steve Milloy twice this week to blast the solar industry. Milloy said that “the solar industry is leading the country … right down the toilet.” He went on to claim that:
STEVE MILLOY: Half the time solar panels don’t even work. Half the time they do work they produce expensive electricity. This is just lose, lose, lose, for America. We can’t do it here.
[...]
MILLOY: Solar panels don’t make economic sense anywhere. They are strictly a luxury item.

The next evening Milloy called Solyndra “the poster child for the disaster of green jobs and clean energy.”

Meanwhile, Rush Limbaugh said he didn’t understand why Solyndra had to shut down because “the sun is still there”...

Don't bother telling them that total solar industry exports exceed imports by over $1.8 billion.

(link...)

R. Neal's picture

Also

The guy claims solar panels are all made in China and produce no jobs here.

Sharp in Memphis (Tennessee) employs 400+ workers making solar panels, and just had a round of hiring in December. They shipped their 2,000,000th solar panel last summer. They say the Memphis operation has produced enough solar panels to power 65,000 homes, 20% of the homes sold in the U.S. last year.

Also, Hemlock Semiconductor is investing $2 billion in a plant near Clarksville (Tennessee) that will employ 500 workers making materials for solar panels. 1600 people are currently on construction.

Also, Wacker Chemi AG is investing $1.5 billion in a plant near Cleveland (Tennessee) that will employ 650 workers making materials for solar panels.

etc.

bizgrrl's picture

This is exciting. Tennessee

This is exciting. Tennessee could be a leader in alternative energy in the future. If, more people would understand the benefits as well as the profits to be made.

Pam Strickland's picture

My church just applied for a

My church just applied for a CAC grant for a solar panel.

Factchecker's picture

Today's published letter from

Today's published letter from Arthur L. McGinley is every bit as bad.

Some letter writers are misinformed (heh)...

...East Tennesseans believe that the United States is a democracy. Nothing could be further from the truth. The United States is a federal republic. The framers would be terribly insulted to believe that the nation had become a democracy...

...people believe the Earth's climate has always been as it now is and that this is the ideal. Even a cursory review of the world's geological history reveals that the Earth has often been both much colder and much hotter as well. Major changes in climate are more likely the result of natural factors — the solar system's position in space, solar storms, volcanic eruptions and meteorite strikes — than human activity. No one can prove that man has had more impact on environmental pollution than natural factors like a volcanic eruption. Nor can they absolutely prove that the changes we are currently experiencing are manmade.

Third, most people are not aware that...

Oh my.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

You may have caught NASA's most recent study on climate change, released last week.

A new NASA study underscores the fact that greenhouse gases generated by human activity—not changes in solar activity—are the primary force driving global warming.

The study offers an updated calculation of the Earth's energy imbalance, the difference between the amount of solar energy absorbed by Earth's surface and the amount returned to space as heat. The researchers' calculations show that, despite unusually low solar activity between 2005 and 2010, the planet continued to absorb more energy than it returned to space.

redmondkr's picture

So Much for NASA Scientists

You know, of course, that many of these same climate change deniers will also tell you that the videos of the moon landings were really shot somewhere in the Nevada desert.

Factchecker's picture

Pure Poetry

Upon rereading the letter, I should have kept this line in the excerpt:
"Those who advance the position that this is a democracy are the ones who can't win with ideas and favor a "Tyranny of the Minority" rather than the rule of law."

Beautiful!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives