Sun
Apr 19 2015
06:23 pm

Today the KNS ran a story about two local debutante balls. Not sure if it's behind the subscription wall, so I'll summarize the main points.

One ball is hosted by the local chapter of AKA, and although these debs are mostly African-American, girls must apply and there is no racial criterion for selection. Knoxville's society event, the Dogwood Ball, is a different story. Invitation only, and one of the official criteria is that the girl must be white. The chairwomen, somebody named Ann Trent, stated that "she does not see a problem with the event being segregated."

Then she went on to say: “I think it’s beautiful that (the local AKA chapter) has started their own for their girls."

As my spouse observed, that remark would have been condescending in 1975. In 2015, it's mind-boggling. And this women didn't say it in private to her friends; she said it for publication.

I'm not at all surprised this is the unofficial policy, given that there's never been a black deb in the history of the Dogwood Ball. I AM surprised it's still an official policy, and shocked at this woman's comments.

Bbeanster's picture

I'm a bit confounded by this

I'm a bit confounded by this story. The News Sentinel has done uncritical "women's page" reporting on this event forever, running pix of the debs when they are named, along with their parents' names, and then a freelancer kind of backs into the 'secret' heart of the ball.

It's been one of those wink, wink, nothing to see, kind of deals forever, too. It's impossible to believe that nobody realized this policy existed, since there's never been a non-white Dogwood deb since the beginning. But at least they didn't hold it at CCC (I think they used to).

Kind of reminds me of when Doug Dickey, upon being asked if Wade Houston, like all the other UT coaches, would get a CCC membership as part of his contract package, replied, "That's not an option."

Now THAT stirred up a shitstorm.

Rachel's picture

Most of the story was a fluff

Most of the story was a fluff piece, but it gave equal time to the AKA ball. My guess is that the reporter (a free-lancer, BTW)didn't set out to write about segregation, but didn't ignore it when she saw it.

I'm not surprised by the policy, only by Ms. Trent being so upfront and proud of it.

And yeah, I thought about Wade Houston too. Now that Barbara Hatton is gone, does Cherokee currently have any black members? I seriously doubt it, but I apologize in advance if I'm wrong.

Tess's picture

This was an excellent story, IMO

Just because some of you are unfamiliar with some social traditions that have occurred forever around here doesn't mean they are bad...

I enjoyed this story in the KNS very much and came to my own conclusions...bottom line, it seems that the older ball has maintained the traditional purpose of the debutante ball more so than has the one based at Cherokee CC.

I thought it was a great story...

Rachel's picture

Just because some of you are

Just because some of you are unfamiliar with some social traditions that have occurred forever around here doesn't mean they are bad...

You might want to clarify this statement. It sounds like you're defending the Dogwood Ball whites-only policy. Surely you're not.

Tess's picture

Your interpretation is the

Your interpretation is the opposite of what I meant. If you read the article, the older group is the AKA sorority, not the Dogwood, CCC group.

Rachel's picture

Glad to hear it. I was

Glad to hear it. I was pretty sure your comment wasn't meant the way it read.

Ugh's picture

WOW.

Just because something has "occurred forever" doesn't mean it's right. It's because of people like you that racism and segregation still exist. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Tess's picture

!

You misinterpret my participation on this thread. My first comment was a conversation starter. You don't know me so don't be so quick to throw around labels which are untrue. You should be ashamed of YOURSELF.

bizgrrl's picture

Wow! Saw the headline. Didn't

Wow! Saw the headline. Didn't read the article. Unbelievable.

R. Neal's picture

Not trying to hijack the

Not trying to hijack the post, but the headline reminded me of this recent KNS glowing review of Twin Peaks "breastaurant":

Twin Peaks: Come for the view, stay for the brew

What century, indeed.

Also reminds me of the time they ran a front page feature on the "misunderstood" Nathan Bedford Forrest for Black History Month.

Matthew Everett's picture

That column almost always

That column almost always features photos of bar patrons. That one's got a pic of employees. Classy.

R. Neal's picture

As my spouse observed, that

As my spouse observed, that remark would have been condescending in 1975.

In 1964 it would have been socially acceptable and par for the course, so to speak.

cafkia's picture

If we just put a little

If we just put a little effort into it, we can eke out one more generation with no significant interaction with a minority. ... even in this "post racial" Amur'kkka.

Tess's picture

Tee hee

You have to admit it is interesting from a sociological perspective and whether intended or not, it was clear that the Dogwood debs were not invited to the "real" deb ball. :)

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

What's clear is that the "real" deb ball, namely AKA's, truly honored individually each young lady being presented. The white girls, in contrast, were introduced in terms of their names, their parents' names, and their zip codes.

And if the white girls' event organizers didn't care for the chatter, cheering, and high-fives that were part of their event's promenade, maybe they should have rehearsed earlier than the day before the event. And skipped the liquor. Or at least served a meal with it. Sheesh...

Tess's picture

Exactly

Your comment expresses much better what I was trying to convey previously.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

The AKA affair for the young African-American ladies sounded much nicer than the Dogwood affair. Those white girls sounded pretty crass, didn't you think?!

(BTW, debutante Dreama Coats, in the very large pic on page 10E, is the daughter of former KCEA President Tanya Coats--who is receiving lots of congratulations on her FB page today!)

Rachel's picture

I should add that I'm one of

I should add that I'm one of those people who rolls her eyes when debutantes are mentioned. Totally archaic concept, IMO. AND sexist. However, I agree that AKA sounds like it has its values and standards straight.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

Same here, really.

I do, however, appreciate the manner in which an event of this sort *could* be used to commend a young lady on her accomplishments to date and to mark her passage into adulthood. It seems from the article that the AKA event better succeeded in doing that.

M. Stafford's picture

"While there is no

"While there is no application process — the Dogwood Ball is by invitation only — there are at least three criteria young women must meet to be considered: they must be sophomores in college and unmarried. They also must be white. Trent said she does not see a problem with the event being segregated." Anne Trent

For Trent to casually make this remark proves she sees nothing wrong with segregation. She is a racist.

hadtodoit's picture

Congratulations, you passed

Congratulations, you passed the reading comprehension portion of this exam. Now please tell us what century this is and your exam will be complete.

Dogwood Ball Mom's picture

Just sickened

My daughter was one of the young women who participated in thia year's Dogwood Ball. It was. Fun event for our entire family. Now, however, I feel literally sick that we were involved. I will be contacting the coordinating committee this week for a refund of the fees we paid, and letting her know how appalled I am. I am 100% certain that other mothers of this year's DB participants will be doing the same thing.

Katie Allison
knoxville

catherine Zane's picture

racist deb ball

Next time check out the criteria and missions of things YOU pay and involve self and family.

At this point, however, you are doing all you can do. If your daughter is in a sorority at college as most of those Anonymousdebs are, you might want to see what the color range is there too.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

Proud of you, Katie. Change always comes from *within* an organization. Said the same thing through all those years I volunteered for Boy Scouts of America, speaking quietly, firmly, repeatedly about their ban on gay Scouts and leaders.

Whatever this organization decides this year, though, I hope you remain involved there. You can effect change.

Your task, I think, will be to support and embrace all that is valuable in this group--and there is value to young women in participating there--even as you stand firm on how the organization can improve.

Knoxgal's picture

Does the AKA offer scholarships?

I'd like to contribute.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

Yes. The KNS story said scholarship awards were a part of this weekend's AKA event.

I did not see any mention of scholarships awarded to Dogwood Ball attendees, though?

Former AKA Deb mom's picture

Yes. The AKAS do offer

Yes. The AKAS do offer scholarships.

Dogwood Ball Mom's picture

Tamara - no scholarships. To

Tamara - no scholarships. To give you an idea of what it's like, just think of a fun party where the whole family dresses up and eats, drinks (the adults) and dances together. It's all about getting gussied up for an evening and just having a fun party with the focus on our daughters. Now that I realize that there's an actual POLICY in place preventing families of color from attending, my memory of what was a fun, family focused evening is entirely different. I am appalled and so embarrassed that we participated. But racist denial of admission aside (ahem), as for how it compares to the wonderful sounding AKA event, they really sound quite different. The AKA event sounds like a personal development program while the Dogwood Ball, like anther debutante events I attended while a college student really is just a lovely party with good food and dancing and such. And again, before I was aware of the explicit, ugly racism that is apparently a defining underpinning of this event, I would have told you that I honestly see nothing wrong with just throwing a party for a party's sake.

Katie Allison
Knoxville

The RiffRaff's picture

Racism is not the only problem

It might be a "lovely party" but even if they deal with the racism issue, this party is still exclusive and elitist. I'm not trying to stop anyone from having a debutante ball, but please don't pretend it's just a regular party.

These parties are not just about socializing; the social groups formed in high school (the popular kids) and in college (fraternities and sororities) keep privilege and opportunity in a small number of hands. If you think this is an exaggeration, ask yourself why they are so dead-set on excluding black people. Exclusivity was the original point.

Treehouse's picture

Thanks KNS

I am grateful that the local newspaper did a story featuring prominently two organizations that seem to be similar but, as we noticed, highlighted a huge difference. I also don't understand the "debutante" concept and am tired of seeing so many white faces in the newspaper when our community is so diverse. Thanks for this article.

Somebody's picture

Existential angst

This is odd. The only East Tennessee Presentation Society I can find registered with the Tennessee Secretary of State appears to have been administratively dissolved in 2008. What does that mean?

fischbobber's picture

Private

I would presume that it means they're private organizations that take seriously the idea that they can do whatever they damn well please. Some for better, some for worse.

Isn't kicking around these late adolescents for something like this a little like protesting at the women's clinic? Is this all we've got?

CathyMcCaughan's picture

No, Bob. Adults are teaching

No, Bob. Adults are teaching segregation to the next generation of leaders. That must stop.

rht's picture

dissolved

usually just means the entity stopped filing its annual corporate reports with the state. Not unusual for this to happen with nonprofit groups, often due to simple inattention. Such a group might continue to operate without the formality of state recognition as a corporation, but not usually a big deal to catch up on reports and regain corporate recognition.

Somebody's picture

They're still filing 990s

They're still filing 990s, though, and the descriptions of their purpose and accomplishments sure do strongly infer an association with the Dogwood Arts organization, even though according to the KNS article they are not associated. I guess if you can't see a problem with racial segregation, you probably can't see the problem with a lot of things.

Bbeanster's picture

Institutionalized racism is a

Institutionalized racism is a pretty big deal to some of us. No apologies for my reaction to this.

I have to admit that the only thing I'm shocked about is that anybody's shocked. I'd bet money that most of these young women are members of segregated sororities and that a goodly number of the Knoxville residents' parents belong to Cherokee Country Club (unless they are running for office, whereupon they resign and say they're too busy to keep their membership).

Roscoe Persimmon's picture

Slow news day at the Milwaukee News Sentinel

If the organizers want to organize their events as they see fit and select who they want to select, they can do it as they please. Didn't bother anybody when a white legislator was excluded from joining the legislative black caucus. Perhaps certain segregated realities really do exist and they are allowed to exist because in the big picture they are menial and trivial.

It's those that are excluded that want to throw the segregation card around, didn't seem to bother either groups big events, but those on the outside looking in can't let anyone else have an evening with their family and their friends without finding some degree of fault in the event and throwing rocks at it. Perhaps that's why they weren't invited to attend either event.

cafkia's picture

Didn't bother anybody when a

Didn't bother anybody when a white legislator was excluded from joining the legislative black caucus. Didn't bother anybody when a white legislator was excluded from joining the legislative black caucus.

And exactly how did you determine that no one was bothered? My best guess is that you are full of shit and that you know it. I will tell you that my reaction was sorrow that the BC put themselves in the position of making a self-centered racist moron a sympathetic figure. If a white, Asian, Latino, indegenous-American or, "other" is honestly interested in and concerned by the plight of Blacks and the historical causes as well as positive ways to correct the issues, I fully support their full membership in the legislative Black Caucus and/or any other compatible organization.

But no one asked me how I felt. When I offered my opinion, it was largely ignored much as you intend to do since it does not support the conclusion you reached without any supporting data. As a matter of fact, no Black person ever admitted to me that they received or filled out a survey on the issue of el Luchador the clown being admitted to the BC. But I tell you what, any time you want to know what Black people think about a given issue, you come here and ask me. (and yes, I have just as much right to speak for the larger group as anyone else you could find and ask.)

fischbobber's picture

Institutionalization

It's institutionalized racism, corporatism, elitism, encouraging financial and social disparity among a lot of groups. There are plenty of people of all colors they won't let in, and many of these girls later reject a lot of the values that this event perpetrates.

It's still picking on girls who may or may not view what they're doing as a mistake brought on by social pressure.

Maybe we could dedicate ourselves to offering a better way, rather than having to pick on young women.

zoomfactor's picture

The power of "tradition"

This KNS story resonates with me, because quite coincidentally, just yesterday I found a bag full of artifacts from my one year in a sorority in college (1980), while rooting around at my mother's house. Just like the Roane State legacy, I realize I was just trying to please my mother by joining that organization, and had no idea of what its true values were until I was fully embedded. These young Dogwood Debs may be in a similar vulnerable position. So yes, I place the blame on the adults who know about these policies (or who may speculate and never verify) yet still participate.

bizgrrl's picture

They are not too young to

They are not too young to learn segregation is not a good thing.

Ann Trent, stated that "she does not see a problem with the event being segregated."

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

What Cathy said, Bob.

Personally, I didn't intend to disparage with my comments above the young women part of the Dogwood Ball.

I do, however, question the values of its adult organizers.

Rachel's picture

a) Nobody's picking on the

a) Nobody's picking on the girls. My guess is that if you allowed them to vote, they'd vote down a "whites only" policy. I hope so, anyway. We're picking on the adults who run this gig.

b) As to being shocked - I'm certainly not shocked that the Dogwood Ball is all white. It's always been that way. I AM surprised that its chair was so quick to acknowledge the official policy - and to defend it. And to make that horrible comment about AKA having another event for "their girls."

Rachel's picture

They've lost Cynthia

They've lost Cynthia Moxley.......

Tess's picture

Good for her...

Good for Cynthia. The KNS article was an eye opener for a lot of people, it seems.

Bbeanster's picture

Mox was always on record as a

Mox was always on record as a critic of CCC policy, even though some of her best clients were/are members. Then she served as Urban League chair for several years. i've known her since 1986 when she hired me at the KJ and can testify that she's not playing around about hating racism.

Hildegard's picture

Disclaimer: both of my nieces

Disclaimer: both of my nieces were debs, and they are both as mortified as all the other mortified white people who read that old lady's comment in the KNS article. The trending reaction of folks I know who ever got into the thing is a mix of embarrassment, sadness, and anger.

But you know, seriously, wth did anybody ever not see right in front of their eyes? I am certain that the vast majority of participants didn't really think about it, just felt honored to be invited, and thought it was a positive, civilized experience for young women who are still growing up in important ways. (Before anybody judges them, be careful. If you live in Knoxville and have a lot of white friends in business, politics, and media, you know at least one deb or parent of a deb, and you would be right in assuming they are not racist, and that they are very upset about this "news.")

So I don't judge the people who didn't get it, but anybody who ever took an honest look at a newspaper story about the event had to notice the gleaming whiteness of every face that ever smiled out of the KNS society column. They just didn't connect the dots for reasons that translate to blinders, just not wanting to see anything odd there, because it's otherwise such a prestigious and gratifying opportunity. Now some old lady runs her mouth, posits that unpleasant yet transparent fact in no uncertain terms, and ruins it forever. Hell, I'm glad she said it. Now maybe people will stop pretending that pretentious, classist bullshit is anything you should be putting your daughters through.

The outrage that everybody seems to overlooking is how the KNS seemed to bury the story almost as soon as it appeared online yesterday - no comments, even. It was kiboshed.

Rachel's picture

KNS

There's a comment on it now. I don't think they buried it - society stuff rarely makes it on the homepage (I suspect, because it doesn't generate many page views). And the comments have dwindled to almost nothing on every story since the KNS instituted the paywall and then starting linking comments to FB ids.

Hell, I'm just happy the didn't edit that part out.

And yeah, on some level everybody knew (or should have known) this. Still, it's heartening to hear so many people calling it out.

Hildegard's picture

Well, now that it's out, and

Well, now that it's out, and it's getting picked up online, they might want to do a little follow-up piece on the strong community reaction to the story.

I've already had one friend whose daughter participated tell me that a woman with the ETPS says that Ms. Trent was wrong, and there is no such criterion in whatever their playbook is. But if the ETPS comes out and says that, they're going to have to explain why never, in their history, have they ever invited a single black (or any person "of color").

They should just go back to inviting only rich WASPs, exclude all the Catholics, Jews, and foreign sounding names like they used to. There's probably been more than one recriminating remark about how if they'd never let new money and other lesser whites in, they wouldn't be having to deal with this tempest in a Royal Albert teapot.

Somebody's picture

The real problem

The problem is that it still takes a "did she actually just say that out loud?" moment to send all the people who just hadn't thought about it scrambling for the exits. Some of those people probably really had noticed, but figured it was better not to rock the boat. Others undoubtedly really hadn't noticed, but that's a problem, too, because that means those people are still thoughtlessly taking segregation as a given.

Either way, it's this kind of quiet acceptance that generates the sort of shock, surprise, and denial when non-whites challenge the every day racism that they experience in this country. By remaining blissfully unaware of all this, people like the lady quoted in the article are left to make the rules, and evidently they don't see any problem with being racist. Next, even when there's not a racist actively making the rules, those defaults are still left in place, un-challenged, and even mindlessly carried out.

At some point, it becomes incumbent on those who hadn't been giving it much thought to go ahead and challenge their own organizations and communities, instead of waiting for an embarrassing situation that can't be ignored to come up.

Tess's picture

Thank you!

You are such a good soul and good writer. My niece was a DD too, as well as some young cousins as they came along in age. None of these folks are racist. Quite the opposite. I reckon they never saw the policy in print until this past Sunday.

Rachel's picture

About that "old lady" - seems

About that "old lady" - seems a bit wrong for Ms. Trent to shoulder all the blame. According to a KNS story from January, here are (some of) the other members of the Board of the East Tennessee Presentation Society:

Anne Trent is chairperson of the Board and Sherry Wallace Barry is the Ball chairperson. Additional board members serving as chairpersons are Judy Pat Overby, Beverly Hogin, Carol Sheridan, Cecil Easterly, Sylvia Lacey, Lynn Leach, Katherine Reed, Ray Sherrill, Anne Taylor, and Velva Trent.

Hildegard's picture

Velva?

Velva?

Rachel's picture

That's what the article said.

That's what the article said.

Bbeanster's picture

This whole debutante deal is

This whole debutante deal is a laughably antiquated rite of passage practiced by those who unquestioningly accept tradition (I'm cueing up Zero Mostel in my head here). I guess there are worse things – like ritual female genital mutilation, or foot binding.

But racism's right up there.

Stick's picture

Spot on...

*

Tamara Shepherd's picture

"Laughably antiquated"

The topic of racism aside for the moment, I do think tweens and teens both male and female need some level of instruction in etiquette, somewhere along the way, and fewer seem to get any these days.

My daughter and I had Big Fun schooling her kid brother, my son, in all manner of these "laughably antiquated" rules, once he hit about middle school age.

On a family night out to eat, she and I would remain seated in the car until each of our gentlemen came 'round to unload us. Then we'd advance to the door of the restaurant and stand there, arms dangling by our sides, until one of our gentlemen opened that door, too. If the boy dared to march off behind the hostess, his older sister would give him a shove and hiss "gentlemen bring up the rear." Next we'd feign puzzlement at how to possibly sit at the dinner table, what with its chairs tucked under the table like that, until each of our gentlemen pulled out a chair to seat us. You get the picture, ha ha.

Today, the boy is as lewd and crude much of the time as any teenage boy you know, but when the spotlight's on him, he can perform--all the way through placing his fork tines down on his dinnerplate when he's through eating.

In fact, the last time he took his girlfriend out to eat, an older couple seated at the table next to them handed my son and his girl a note when they left. The older couple found them to be a handsome couple and commended my son for being such a gentleman. Please forgive me for wanting to repeat that story every chance I get :-)

typical elitist's picture

Getting all worked up over a dance

Getting all worked up over a dance while ignoring all of the people around the world that are currently being mutilated, burned and killed in various brutal ways because they are not Islam is very elitist.

Would you consider Jihadists racists or are they just bad dancers?

Hildegard's picture

Congratulations! You win the

Congratulations! You win the Dumbest Reply in this Here Whole Entire Thread Award. Pick up your half eaten moonpie and warm can of RC cola in the trash can.

typical elitist's picture

Really! ritual female genital mutilation

Really! You did not think comparing ritual female genital mutilation to a Debutante Ball takes the prize?

Your Moonpie and RC comment gives you the appearance of a typical race baitin' fool.

Elwood Aspermonte's picture

Say Goodbye to the Dogwood Debutante Ball

I'm sure the other nice ball for young ladies will continue onward without additional comment, criticism, or other concern.

Maybe when there's nothing else left in Knoxville but the memories of what a really neat place it was to live, work, and raise your family before all of the rock throwers found their way into places they really had no business being, maybe just then the rock throwing will stop, but I doubt it.

Somebody's picture

What a load

I sincerely hope that one day soon there will be "nothing else left in Knoxville but the memories of what a really neat place it was to live, work, and raise your family," if by "neat" you mean racist and segregated, which clearly you do.

I also hope that the other organization does continue onward, because if the Dogwood Debutante Ball goes away, those who still want to go to a ball can apply for the AKA ball, which doesn't have an exclusionary policy. It sounds like a much better program, anyway.

Mike Knapp's picture

A few thoughts on being white anti-racist allies

I felt compelled to offer some thoughts from my experiences in anti-racist work and training as an organizer. Its effects are pernicious and vile. Ms. Trent and others who feel as she does could perhaps at least ponder not only its obvious effects on people of color now, in the past and future but also on how it affects Ms. Trent and her ilk.

  • Actively oppose racism and white racial supremacy.
  • Challenge our own biases such as internalized racial superiority.
  • Fight against individual and structural expressions of racism.
  • Understand that race is a social construct, not a biological concept.
  • Think clearly about the meaning of the term "white privilege" from individual and structural viewpoints.
  • Engage as supporters of people of color, not leaders on behalf of their struggle.

I would invite anyone connected to the CCC or the Dogwood Ball group to check out the Peoples Institute for Survival and Beyond and have them conduct a training with their leadership.

bizgrrl's picture

Excellent.

Excellent.

Lisa Starbuck's picture

Disbelief

I'm finding it hard to believe that Ms. Trent and the committee could be so blatantly racist and willing to say it in print and not expect any repercussions. One of my friends said that maybe she was misquoted and the requirement is that they WEAR white, but if you read the original, you know it wasn't a misquote. Ms. Trent went on to say that she was glad that AKA had an event for "their" girls too.

Some traditions aren't worth keeping. This is one of them.

Tess's picture

*

I thought she said they had to wear white too when I read it on Sunday.

Rachel's picture

She did say that - pure

She did say that - pure white, not the dreaded champagne. :)

On Cynthia Moxley's post, somebody commented that maybe Ms. Trent made a mistake and didn't understand the policy. She's been chair of the ETPS for 25 years, so yeah, she understands it fine.

Racism Sucks's picture

Racism sucks

I still can't believe that the woman in charge said that but I do want to point out that if you go look at who the Dogwood Ball debutantes were this year, at least one of the girls was not white.

(link...)

I also think that it would be fair to ask the AKA organizers how many white debutantes they've had apply for their program and of those, how many were accepted. How many white AKA debutantes have there ever been in Knoxville? I am guessing not many if any.

Racism sucks. If families want to throw these kinds of activities for their daughters, the whole process should be totally integrated.

Bbeanster's picture

Semi-close, but no cigar

Given the nature of racism in Knoxville and elsewhere, I'd be pretty damned shocked if a Caucasian had ever applied for the AKA event. I suspect you would be, too.

Also, I don't know the ethnicity of the only potential non-white I saw in the lineup, but judging mostly by her last name, she is not an African American. Also, having a daddy whose name is prefixed by "Dr" is bonus points.

Average Guy's picture

Channeling Carnac

A: Fox News

Q: What happens to former debutantes? (link...)

Put me in the camp of not shocked. At all.

You don't need video of racist frat songs or quotes from an "old lady" to understand what these clubs are about.

TM Illingworth. 's picture

‘Débutante Balls Strive To Preserve Traditional Civility’

Them’s Some Débutante Balls All Right. East Tennessee Style

cg's picture

fwiw

Chattanooga's deb event, the Cotton Ball, desegregated in 1999. And it was in the paper at the time that they had their first black deb, because I remember reading it - and knew the girl in question - and was shocked that it had taken until 1999 for there to be a non-white deb. And I'm still embarrassed it took them so long. (I was not a deb, but many close friends were.) I mean, even Augusta National has a black female member now - wtf is wrong with Knoxville?

R. Neal's picture

WVLT: Trent denies racist

WVLT: Trent denies racist remarks

Trent is the one who gave the paper the interview and says she was just as shocked as anyone when she read the article.

"I wouldn't want people to think I felt that way," says Trent.

It may be her name next to the words, but Trent says they're not hers.

"I did not say that because that is not in our bylaws. There is nothing in our bylaws to say that," says Trent.

Average Guy's picture

Whew!

Glad those bylaws are ass covering.

I'm sure she'd hate it if she had to rely on decades worth of pictures to prove herself.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

Okay, so the WVLT reporter asked Trent to comment on whether the Dogwood Ball guest list is confined to white girls and Trent answered that there's no direction of that sort in the organization's bylaws.

I wish the reporter had then asked Trent whether any non-white girls had ever been invited to the ball.

I also wish the reporter had then asked Trent about the rest of her quote to KNS, namely Trent's suggestion that it was "beautiful" for AKA to have also conducted a ball for "their" girls.

As it stands, the WVLT "follow-up" is kinda weak tea...

Bbeanster's picture

Nailed it, T!

Nailed it, T!

KC's picture

I doubt Trent is actively

I doubt Trent is actively racist/segregationist but just rather traditionalist/not-rocking-the-boat.

And yes Knoxville leadership is often in their own boat cut-off from the rest. Look around you. Leadership meetings, churches, etc. Heck, look at Neyland Stadium next time, and then on the field.

Stuff like this affects the common person very little.

cafkia's picture

No. Stuff like this affects

No. Stuff like this affects the power structure very little. Us common folk who are routinely denied access to the halls of power are exactly who is affected. When the next generation of power players, corporate leaders, city, state and federal politicians and bureaucrats, etc, when they are hiring their assistants or picking their department heads or filling cabinet positions, who will they go with? The people they know! If through the machinations of their parents and social structure, they have had no interaction with minorities and economic lower class, there is a significantly reduced chance (read: zero) that they will organically pick someone from those groups.

At the debutante ball is the perfect place to fight racism if that was what you wanted to do. Perfect because you can attack its foundations and you could do it with your nose in the air and not a single quote from Malcolm X. Or, you can say your ball is just about having fun and thereby make sure that the social inertia that maintains racism is not interrupted.

KC's picture

It's not so much as what's

It's not so much as what's being passed down as it is a reflection of the current power structure. Any move toward diversity will be token anyway.

Cement Boat's picture

Amen, cafkia!

It starts in high school (or maybe middle school) with the "popular kids". Something serious is behind this; cafkia is exactly right. These kids will go on to be fraternity and sorority members at UT, then go into daddy's business or get a management position in government or a friend's business, and will hire their friends and fraternity brothers.

This is how it's done. Parents teach it by putting all the emphasis on fitting in rather than on being inclusive.

Knoxgal's picture

What if they're outstanding but...

"I did not say that because that is not in our bylaws. There is nothing in our bylaws to say that," says Trent. "They are chosen for just being outstanding girls in their school, their church, athletics."

What if a girl is outstanding but she goes to a synagogue or a mosque or doesn't participate in any organized religion? These are still exclusionary criteria meant to preserve outdated Southern cultural norms. My guess is few - if any - that aren't WASPS have ever been invited. And I would guess that excellence in athletics has been interpreted loosely.

By the way, there's a high school version of this, although I don't know who runs it and forgot what it's called.

Tess's picture

*

Teen Board

Knoxgal's picture

Not Teen Board

Definitely not teen board. I had 2 kids who participated in Teen Board and I don't remember any exclusionary criteria other than being a high school student and volunteering to join. By then Teen Board had become strictly a service organization and was no longer a social club. But when my daughter was in high school several of her female friends were invited to participate in a formal dance. She was not invited I suspect because we didn't meet the criteria specified above.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

International Order of the Rainbow (Rainbow Girls)?

They're associated with the Freemasons and *used* to host dances, back when I was in my teens. No, I wasn't a member.

Rachel's picture

Girl's Cotillion?

Knoxgal's picture

I'm thinking it must be Junior Cotillion

I"m thinking it must be Junior Cotillion. The website says boys and girls but I'm pretty sure it was only girls back then. It also says something about etiquette classes but I was only aware of the formal dance. The girls all went shopping for long gowns and had to invite a boy to be their escort. I couldn't find any criteria for how a young person is included.

(link...)

Bbeanster's picture

Rainbow gathering? (link...)

Rainbow gathering?

(link...)

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

Different "rainbow" group, looks like (giggle).

I'll bet Knoxgal is recalling the group Rachel linked, Girls' Cotillion.

Some of those Rainbow Girls I knew back in the day couldn't gain admittance to Girls' Cotillion, I wouldn't think. After all, their mom's made their formals on a sewing machine in a back bedroom. GC girls' moms, probably not.

KC's picture

When were the bylaws written

When were the bylaws written and last approved?

Honestly, how many have read the bylaws from organizations they have belonged to?

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

Me.

Bad Paper Original 's picture

Did the stringer get it wrong?

Who is Lesli Bales-Sherrod? The reporter that wrote this KNS story? Did the KNS fact check this piece? Or did they, as they sometimes do, run with it because it was juicy? Why didn't KNS respond to WVLT's request for a comment on Anne Trent's denial?

(link...)

"Lesli Bales-Sherrod, who previously worked for The Daily Times as a reporter in 2005-2006, has returned to the newspaper as a full-time reporter to cover municipal government.

She is replacing government reporter Iva Butler, who retired."

I don't recall seeing a byline from Lesli Bales-Sherrod in the KNS before this. If there is not a voice recording, then the KNS needs to explain how this got printed. This is reminiscent of the salacious 15 year old birthday party in the KNS several years ago in 2006. The Leslie Gibbs debacle. All the KNS links are dead. But this KnoxViews link recaptures the event: (link...)

Bbeanster's picture

Anne Trent's denial doesn't

Anne Trent's denial doesn't comport with the entirety of her quote (as others have pointed out).

But it should be a simple matter for her to pull out the scrap book and display all the diversity. Heck, they've probably got everything from AOPi to ZTA.

Somebody's picture

Hopefully the reporter

Hopefully the reporter recorded the interview. If so, it should be easy enough to confirm or correct the quote.

Bbeanster's picture

OTOH, The absence of a tape

OTOH, The absence of a tape recording wouldn't necessarily support Ms Trent's clam. I rarely ever use a tape recorder unless I'm planning to quote a speech in its entirety or am dealing with a source I do not trust.
I've never had anyone accuse me of making up a quote.

There's no indication the reporter approached this story with a secret agenda.

Average Guy's picture

Recordings

There is a record.

Decades worth of photos.

At this point, the burden of proving anything is on the organization.

B Harmon's picture

Press release?

At this point, the burden of proving anything is on the organization.

If the organization does not trust KNS or WATE to get their story correct, they should issue a press release stating their rules and position. Funny thing, they need a PR firm to help them manage this mess. We know which one will NOT be handling this account.

This no longer has anything to do with KNS.

(Also, I assume that the participating families likely pay some exorbitant amount to be in the ball plus all the gowns and tuxedos. Aren't both parents also at the ball to "present their daughter?" Clearly another way to make this for the socially and financially elite.)

fischbobber's picture

Elite

If you look at attendance figures and do the basic math as to the amount of likely legacies that turned down invitations, the Dogwood Ball no longer fits the "elite" status. If one takes out the racial quotes and looks at the rest of the article about the dance, it is not much more than a super-high priced Sadie Hawkins dance for the nouveau riche as opposed to a society ball. Hooting and hollering during presentation. Really? What fresh hell is this generation going to invent for us? Racist overtones aside, in a way it's sad to see social training in formal behavior disintegrate like this. It's ironic that the AKA Ball is the only truly formal avenue available to young ladies of this age.

It's kind of like being in the middle of the burning of Atlanta scene in Gone With the Wind.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

...it is not much more than a super-high priced Sadie Hawkins dance for the nouveau riche as opposed to a society ball. Hooting and hollering during presentation. Really? What fresh hell is this generation going to invent for us? Racist overtones aside, in a way it's sad to see social training in formal behavior disintegrate like this.

Yes, it was just this behavior I was referencing earlier, when I suggested that affairs of this sort *could* be beneficial to young people as a means of teaching them a little something about etiquette.

Obviously, this particular affair didn't.

Jamie Satterfield's picture

Food for thought

If you picked up your morning newspaper or received an alarmed call from a friend or saw all manner of indignation at a story in which you were quoted and, in fact, never said the offending comment, that it was completely fabricated or misinterpreted, what would be your reaction? Me? I'd be ringing the hook off the phone of the editor, the publisher, etc... demanding a correction. If instead you made the comment but are now catching heat for it, what would be your reaction? Claim you were misquoted. Shoot the messenger, etc. Just saying.

R. Neal's picture

That's exactly what I was

That's exactly what I was thinking.

Bad Paper Original 's picture

nice excuse

Did Leslie Gibbs demand a correction?

(link...)

Anne Trent might not trust the KNS today. That story had a Rolling Stone UVA Sabrina Rubin Erdely tone. History showed how that worked out.

Since Trent has denied it. Come forth with the recording. If all Lesli Bales-Sherrod has is reporters notes, then it was questionable to print it.

Bbeanster's picture

Umm, Bad P, is Leslie Gibbs

Umm, Bad P, is Leslie Gibbs out of the slammer yet?

(link...)

Bad Paper Original 's picture

I remembered her and her

I remembered her and her crimes. How does that diminish the hit piece that was done before she was arrested? Was it journalism karma? Maybe Sabrina Rubin Erdely knows something that is yet to be revealed at UVA?

I don't know what is real about that story. But there is a hint of agenda in it. Maybe Trent is a relic from a past time. I'm shocked at what she allegedly said. Now, I want to know if she said it. Correct me if I'm wrong. Do stringers generally do a piece like that? With that content? Like the Gibbs piece, there was a lot of collateral damage done. Salacious collateral damage to other people that had nothing to do with the quote. Are you saying they were wrong because they attended? They should feel some shame? Or remorse?

If Trent had said nothing and dropped it, it would be different. She denied it. KNS should cough up the recording and reporters notes.

Jamie Satterfield's picture

Lost cause

As the reporter who covered Leslie Gibbs aka Leslie Janous' crimes, I really am having trouble with your complaints about the sweet 15 party coverage in terms of your allegation it was a hit piece or somehow inaccurate causing "salacious collateral damage" whatever the heck that means. It was written by Kevin Cowan, who was invited by Gibbs/Janous to cover. Of course, given your history, I don't know why I am even posing questions to you but please do elaborate for those of us who are mere mortals working for the great satan.

Rachel's picture

+1And I agree with Tamara.

+1

And I agree with Tamara. It's pretty hard to be believe that Ms. Trent was misquoted on a) the girls have to be white, b) she's ok with that, and c) she thinks it's "beautiful" that AKA has an event for "their girls" (this one presented as a direct quote).

Also hard to believe that creating a flap was the reporter's primary intention, since this information was buried halfway through a lengthy story.

Good to know the white-only thing isn't actually in the by-laws. But ETPS has more work to do to make this go away.

KC's picture

I think Trent got taught in

I think Trent got taught in the legacy of shame, which a lot of people were responsible for.

KC's picture

taught caught

taught
caught

zoomfactor's picture

I think "taught" works.

I think "taught" works.

R. Neal's picture

At 6 pm- great interviews

At 6 pm- great interviews with @JackatNews @cmmoxley about Dogwood Ball & race in Knoxville. @knoxviews also gets a shout out.

(link...)

amybroyles's picture

Power Structures

From an earlier post by cafkia -

"Stuff like this affects the power structure very little. Us common folk who are routinely denied access to the halls of power are exactly who is affected. When the next generation of power players, corporate leaders, city, state and federal politicians and bureaucrats, etc, when they are hiring their assistants or picking their department heads or filling cabinet positions, who will they go with? The people they know! If through the machinations of their parents and social structure, they have had no interaction with minorities and economic lower class, there is a significantly reduced chance (read: zero) that they will organically pick someone from those groups."

He is absolutely correct. If you are used to being in groups that are all white, the lack of young women of color at this event wouldn't even register with you, until it is pointed out by someone else. It would seem absolutely normal. Hence all the parents who didn't notice the lack of diversity at this function, but are now outraged by it. The same goes for groups that are all male - the lack of women is not even noticed. And, as he correctly observes, when it comes time to fill a position, make an appointment, or give a promotion, it seems normal that a male, or a white person, is the one who is chosen. Only those who are left out - the women, and the people of other ethnicities or economic circumstances - are the ones who notice. And then are often criticised or dismissed for remarking upon it, or demanding better. We may get our token female, or person of color, or individual with a disability, but the underlying power structures remain the same, and unchanged.

Rachel's picture

It led the 6 p.m. WATE news

Just saw that. Interesting that a) Ms. Trent did not respond to WATE's repeated calls for comment, and b) the KNS editors had the reporter call Ms. Trent to verify her comments, at which point Ms. Trent stated that if the story was going to be discuss race, she didn't want it published. No mention that she denied making the comments.

The KNS is standing by the story and its reporter.

I'm really happy to see this discussion happening in our community. If it makes people think a bit about their inherent biases, that's a good thing.

wilful1's picture

The Debutante Ball Tradition

So no one is looking yet at the true tradition of the debutante ball. It started as a meat market. It was a chance for young "ladies" born to money and prestige to show their beauty and their graces to families of young men with money and prestige. The goal was marriage within the class. And it was certainly marriage within the race since miscegenation was illegal then.

One thing we can say for what Mrs. Trent told the reporter: We know exactly where she stands. The recanting that took place the next day is far less credible. Whether the bylaws say or don't say really isn't the point. The point is that white privilege, as always, puts its smarmy, indecent mark on most of what those of us with pale skin participate in.

We have begun to analyze and reject white privilege, but we have only begun. Will we have the maturity to continue?

amybroyles's picture

Agreed

Everything about this tradition is both racist and sexist - right down to the virginal white gowns that are required to be worn.

Bad Paper Original 's picture

there it is

"Everything about this tradition is both racist and sexist - right down to the virginal white gowns that are required to be worn."

There it is. The purpose of that KNS story. Social justice. Diversity forced, is not diversity. Diversity is organic and the result of choice.

It's their right to dress the way they want to. it's their right to keep their transitional dance. How does that make these young women either racists or sexists?

wilful1's picture

there it is

The young women are objects in these events, not subjects. Adults have decided where they will be presented and to whom. And adults have put the racial barriers in place.

But then young people learn them and hide behind them. And white young people often take advantage of all the privilege handed to them without even thinking about it. I am glad to see here some recognition of the ugly import of that naivete.

amybroyles's picture

there it is?

My comments were about the tradition, not the girls themselves (also, your assertion that it is "their choice" is also incorrect - if one of those girls had wanted to wear a lovely scarlet gown with a big black sash, she would have been told no). However, by participating in this tradition, these are the things they are being taught.

How many people, when they walk into a room full of while, able-bodied people (and especially white, able-bodied men), automatically think, "What is wrong with this picture?" Very few. And of those few, how many are willing to remark openly about it, or better yet, do something about it?

Sexism, racism, classism, and ableism are all too deeply embedded in our culture to change "organically." Whenever major strides have been made in civil rights, women's rights, or the rights of any other marginalized group, it was because of the courage and actions of those who knew it would never occur on it's own.

Rachel's picture

Sexism, racism, classism, and

Sexism, racism, classism, and ableism are all too deeply embedded in our culture to change "organically." Whenever major strides have been made in civil rights, women's rights, or the rights of any other marginalized group, it was because of the courage and actions of those who knew it would never occur on it's own.

This.

amybroyles's picture

Clarification

"How many people, when they walk into a room full of while, able-bodied people (and especially white, able-bodied men), automatically think, "What is wrong with this picture?" Very few."

I should have stated, "How many white people..." Women, people of color, and other marginalized groups notice right away.

Something else I've observed about "white privilege" and "male privilege" is that those who are part of it, benefit from it, and perpetuate it, are usually blissfully unaware of it. And if their attention is called to it, regardless of how gently, they are most likely to respond with disbelief, along with defensiveness, condescension, criticism, or outright hostility.

Bad Paper Original 's picture

WATE

Jack McElroy's comments on WATE show the KNS knew this would blow up. When contacted by WATE the Dogwood Ball group denied the quote. Trent did not respond to WATE. There was no recording. Only reporter's notes according to McElroy. McElroy says reporter contacted Trent again to verify what was said. Trent said if this story is about race, I don't want the story printed.

Cough up the notes KNS.

wilful1's picture

WATE

Here's what Jack Neely actually said: “We stand by our article and stand by our reporter who wrote it. Before publication, the editor involved and myself reviewed what was said in the interview. We went over her notes and what was said in the conversation. The reporter made another phone call to Anne Trent to make sure everything was clarified. And at that point, Anne’s response was, ‘If you’re going to deal with race, I don’t want the article to be published.’ We were not willing to take that step,” said Knoxville News Sentinel Editor Jack McElroy, explaining the back story.

Puts a slightly different slant on it, doesn't it?

Rachel's picture

Here's a link to the WATE

Here's a link to the WATE story.

Here's a question I have. If the ETPS is so upset about the alleged misquote, why haven't they asked the KNS for a retraction?

R. Neal's picture

Exactly.

Exactly.

Bbeanster's picture

Jack McElroy's comments on

Jack McElroy's comments on WATE show the KNS knew this would blow up. When contacted by WATE the Dogwood Ball group denied the quote. Trent did not respond to WATE. There was no recording. Only reporter's notes according to McElroy. McElroy says reporter contacted Trent again to verify what was said. Trent said if this story is about race, I don't want the story printed.

Your point is murky as Trent's defense. You're losing this one, bad.

(on edit) Maybe I should say, 'You're losing this one, Bad.'

Bad Paper Original 's picture

You misunderstand.

"Your point is murky as Trent's defense."

I don't know what is true here. Do you?

Four parties disagree. Trent and the Dogwood Ball people say the quote is misquoted. The writer and Jack McElroy say it is correct. Very much like the Rolling Stone story on the UVA rapes that never happened. The KNS has done this before. Leading stories are not an exceptionally rare occurrence.

Why not produce the reporter's notes? In the past the KNS has had to backup a story. How many times does Jack McElroy take the his blog to explain things? Often.

It is clear that Trent and the Dogwood Ball people will not take calls from the KNS. They don't trust them.

I want to know what really happened and I don't trust Jack McElroy. Scan the notes and put them up.

A_Falk's picture

Who is

Bad Paper anyway, just a person who derives some kind of personal fulfillment by grinding his wheels against whatever the prevailing opinion is on knoxviews via constant anonymous posting?

wilful1's picture

WATE

Sorry. Jack McElroy

Rachel's picture

Why any of you dignify BP

Why any of you dignify BP (alias 9) with a response is beyond me. Much better to ignore the hell out of him.

wilful1's picture

It Is Clear

"It is clear that Trent and the Dogwood Ball people will not take calls from the KNS. They don't trust them."

Not so very clear that distrust is the reason. They may not want to have to face the storm that has come upon them. People used to having their own way behave like this.

We all understand that if you are taking names from people in your select circle, nobody Black is likely to be included. And in fact, if anyone Black has ever been included, she has been rejected. Why do you want to distract from the reality by speculating about the notes? What is your vested interest here?

jbr's picture

Some non-local news coverage

Pam Strickland's picture

If McElroy didn't trust the

If McElroy didn't trust the reporter, that quote never would have seen the light of day. My guess is that the story was written and the reporter's supervising editor went over it and then took it to McElroy. It was all reviewed, and it was decided that because it was clearly going to cause an uproar, Trent should be given a chance to say something else about her remark. And at that point she realized that she'd said something on the record that she never meant to, that she believed all "good"people would clearly understand would be off the record. And she was likely in denial ever since that follow up conversation, telling herself that by either denying it was ever said or refusing to talk to other media that she'd get through it.

Jamie Satterfield's picture

+1 million

+1 million

Billyblanks's picture

Exclusionary

It is hilarious to read people ask for pictures to show that these balls are diverse. Neither ball is diverse. If you believe one should be integrated (which I do) you cannot believe the other should be allowed to keep out the oppressors or keep it a safe space or whatever new terms racists who have redefined racism use.

If you believe only white people can be racist, you are racist.
The highlander center and other racist orgs that work aggresively against the dream of MLk and a cokor lind society make me furious.

Billyblanks's picture

Exclusionary

It is hilarious to read people ask for pictures to show that these balls are diverse. Neither ball is diverse. If you believe one should be integrated (which I do) you cannot believe the other should be allowed to keep out the oppressors or keep it a safe space or whatever new terms racists who have redefined racism use.

If you believe only white people can be racist, you are racist.
The highlander center and other racist orgs that work aggresively against the dream of MLk and a cokor lind society make me furious.

Billyblanks's picture

Color blind... It is almost

Color blind...

It is almost as hypocritical as Jimmy Carter hating on the Southern Baptists for their views on women while loving the Muslims to read the deep seated antipathy of people towards white only groups who attend and celebrate groups that are for blacks only like the ones the KNS celebrates every year.

Billyblanks's picture

Cynthia Moxley

Writes about the horrific racism faced by her friends at a party for old rich white people because two of them thought her friend was a member of the band.

Her friend is married to the head of a group that in writing excludes whites from the work they do. Providing scholarships to one color or opportunities to one color is wrong.
(link...)

Anyone who voted against Obama because he is black is a racist and I have nothing but contempt for them. Anyone who voted for Obama because he is black is a racist as well.

Katie 's picture

Reporter Lesli Bales-Sherrod

FYI, the reporter on this story is a stellar journalist and human being. She's not "just a freelancer." She's an extremely experienced reporter who has also worked in media relations at the highest levels of the federal government. Lesli would never get a quote like that wrong. I'm very pleased that the KNS is backing her publicly on this issue.

Katie Allison
Knoxville, TN

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives