Tue
Mar 3 2009
09:47 am

Speaking of conservative freak shows, Rush Limbaugh was apparently a big hit at the CPAC meeting this past weekend. He explained why he wants President Obama to fail, and says that he speaks for all Republicans in that regard. He noted that Democrats wanted Bush to fail, so what's the difference?

Actually, Democrats and anyone else paying attention wanted Bush to succeed. We all wanted his economic policies to succeed. Look where that got us. We wanted him to "win" in Iraq. Six years later we're still waiting for the occupation to end and our troops to come home, even though the WMDs were "neutralized" and Saddam was deposed in short order.

He also said that Democrats have destroyed families by replacing fathers with with welfare checks for mothers who keep having babies. What he's really saying is Republicans don't want to pay taxes to support freeloaders.

What he fails to mention that welfare (TANF) was about 0.5% of federal spending in 2008, and food stamps (SNAP) were about 1%. So a total of 1.5% of federal spending went for "welfare" to help millions of needy Americans.

Compare that to just the Wall Street bailout, which was about 19.4% of federal spending. And that's not counting all the other corporate welfare.

Topics:
bizgrrl's picture

1% vs 19.4%, hmmmmm.

1% vs 19.4%, hmmmmm. Corporate welfare is okay, helping the needy is not. What a country....

[/sarcasm tag] Please, I love my country.

MDB's picture

Wait just a gol-durn minute

He explained why he wants President Obama to fail, and says that he speaks for all Republicans in that regard.

He actually said he speaks for all Republicans?

What. An. Unmitigated. Jackass.

I'd like for one prominent Republican to stand up to that blowhard, and say, "No, we don't hope he fails. We may think he will fail, we may have grave doubts about his plans, but we must hope we are wrong and that he succeeds, because if he fails, America fails, and if he succeeds, America succeeds."

Oh, wait, the Republicans who have stood up to him have ended having to grovel before him seeking penance for daring to speak ill of el Rushbo. And they accuse us of treating Obama as if he were a messiah.

Congratulations, Republicans, your intellectual leader is a college dropout talk show host. Aren't you proud?

Voting is like driving. If you want to go backwards, select R. If you want to go forward, select D.

gonzone's picture

Actually

It appears to me that he DOES speak for all Republicans. And Michael Steele now agrees that Rush be de man.

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."

gonzone's picture

pretty pictures

Maybe pretty pictures are easier to grok. Now, is failure red or blue? Think carefully children. The Crazy People Are Congregating circle jerk might be able to read this, you think? More blue coming, just takes a little longer than 2 weeks.


"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."

sugarfatpie's picture

This is Frankenstein

Dr. Frankenstein (Newt Gingrich, Karl Rove, and the big time GOP donors they direct) are now being slowly suffocated by the monster (Rush and the vast right wing media echo-chamber) that they created.

-Sugarfatpie (AKA Alex Pulsipher)

"X-Rays are a hoax."-Lord Kelvin

Nobody's Shadow's picture

the best...

The best part of Rush's appearance at CPAC, for me anyway, was mistaking the Declaration of Independence for the Constitution, and misquoting it as well. This while receiving CPAC's "Defender of the Constitution Award."

Steele's no the only elected GOP official who has made the penitential pilgrimage to the EIB microphone to say, I'm sorry Rush. There was always an unpleasantness about the relationship between the GOP and Rusho- but at least from a political ground game perspective it seemed apparent that the GOP was using the Limbaughs of the world as part of the grand Southern Strategy that made people as, "What's the matter with Kansas?" It's kinda fun to see yet another element of that dirty business collapsing in on itself.

Brian A.'s picture

The more the Republican

The more the Republican party listens to Rush's "advice," the better. Comedian Limbaugh doesn't seem to get that the world is changing; this isn't 1998 anymore.

It's funny watching (almost) all the GOP elected officials and party leaders kiss up to him. Actually, funny and pathetic.

Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.

MDB's picture

New Hat for Rush?

At this point, I would only be slightly surprised to see the Republican Party present Rush with one of these:

Pope Hat

Mind you, the only thing that would surprise me about it would be to learn that they were willing to offend conservative Catholics....

Voting is like driving. If you want to go backwards, select R. If you want to go forward, select D.

Factchecker's picture

No, don't answer

...with one of these...

Where would that go, exactly?

KC's picture

Oh, wait, the Republicans

Oh, wait, the Republicans who have stood up to him have ended having to grovel before him seeking penance for daring to speak ill of el Rushbo.

The bigger point is why it's happening. The Republican party is like a human body suffering from hypothermia. The skin, the extremites, everything else is abandoned, because the body focuses its remaining energy on keeping the "core" organs alive. If the core organs fail, it's over.

The Republicans are rushing to Rush, because they are afraid of losing the core. If the core of the Republicans dies, the party as they know it dies.

/blockquote>

Yep. And there goes the GOP's symbol of change and outreach. If Steele had any credibility as a vehicle of change, he's lost it now.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives