Super delegate Gov. Bill Richardson has chosen to not endorse the presidential candidate chosen by the majority of voters in his state of New Mexico.

Gov. Bill Richardson has chosen to endorse Sen. Barak Obama.

That is why, out of loyalty to my country, I endorse him for president.

The majority of voters in New Mexico chose Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Super delegates are not bound to vote how the people they represent vote. As with Sen. Edward Kennedy from Massachusetts who has also endorsed Obama when the voters from Massachusetts overwhelmingly selected Clinton. The super delegate math should get very interesting in that it appears the 2008 Democratic presidential candidate will not be determined by the state primaries and caucuses.

bill young's picture

Say What??

Trying to get a rise out of us Obama folks?

Clinton's got the Governor of Maryland
& a Senator from Hawaii.She lost both.

Since super tuesday,it's no suprise to anyone that
the uncommited super delegates would put one
or the other over the top.

Fact..there are super delegates for Obama in
states Clinton won..there are super delegates
for Clinton in states Obama won.

Some super delegates are going with who won their
congressional district.

One super delegate pointed out he may go the
way his hometown went.

Jimmy Carter of Plains,Georgia.

If Obama can somehow get an upset win in Pa.

We win.

If not..next stop..N.C & Indiana...May 6th.

SteveMule's picture

I agree

Bill,
I agree. This whole "who the superdelegates should vote for" is stupid. Hell, some supers commited before the first primary vote was ever counted. Each will have their own cretria and that's the way it should be.
One more thing ... does Obama have to actually 'win' PA? What if the spread is less than 5%? What does that mean?

Take Care, Be Good and don't play in the street!

SteveMule

bizgrrl's picture

No, not trying to get a rise

No, not trying to get a rise out of Obama supporters. Just stating a fact. Some people have been adamant that super delegates should vote the way of the citizens. However, it is not required to work that way, as shown by Richardson's endorsement. Keep in mind that the governor of Maryland and the senator from Hawaii both endorsed before the primaries for those states (not after the voters had spoken), possibly to encourage voters of their states, which, of course, did not work in those instances.

Knox Vol JJ's picture

Isn't Clinton herself

Isn't Clinton herself telling pledged delegates that they should vote for who they personally want instead of honoring the caucus or primary results? This is also in line with your timing statement, Clinton is wanting pledged delegates to crossover to her after their primary/caucus is over?

bill young's picture

bizgrrl

then why do you smash kennedy in your first post?

kennedy did the same thing gov o'malley of maryland & sen.inoway of hawaii did for clinton.

kennedy endorsed obama before the massachusetts primary.

your point is well taken on richardson.

but i'll takes his super delegate vote for obama.

its a tough race & it's all about the campaign's ground
game between now & the final primaries june 3rd.

clintons got to win pa..she's ahead in all but
one poll.

then if she can win ind,west va,ky,p.r.

that would stop the super delegate bleeding & give clinton leverage to seat mich/fla favorable to her.

i'm for obama & we are working like hell to upset
clinton in pa & end this thing.

but if we dont..the beat goes on

bill young's picture

we go to nc & indiana

we go to nc & indiana

SteveMule's picture

Just suppos'n

Bill,
Suppose Obama wins by 5% or less? Or by any margin?

Take Care, Be Good and don't play in the street!

SteveMule

Nancy from Illinois's picture

I am a Democrat and if Obama

I am a Democrat and if Obama wins most delegates from state primaries and caucauses and Hillary is chosen to run for President, I will be voting for McCain- never Hillary.And there are millions of voters just like me.
The reason?
She's about as dirty a politician as there is. She tears Obama down, and Obama has continued to be respectful. American voters can see this. OBAMA can beat McCain!! No problem!!!
As far as MI and FL are concerned, the people CHOSE to vote KNOWING their delegates would not be COUNTED. I hope Mr. Dean continues to go by the rules!!!

CathyMcCaughan's picture

I will vote the Democratic

I will vote the Democratic ticket no matter which candidate is on the eventual ballot. I have a preference, but I would rather it be the person that the majority of American democrats want than someone who buys their way onto the ballot with superdelegate wheeling and dealing. I HATE that two states of voters are being excluded. Their votes should count.

Nelle's picture

Fixed

I am a Democrat moron and if Obama wins most delegates from state primaries and caucauses and Hillary is chosen to run for President, I will be voting for McCain- never Hillary.

bizgrrl's picture

Super delegates are not

Super delegates are not bound to vote how the people they represent vote. As with Sen. Edward Kennedy from Massachusetts who has also endorsed Obama when the voters from Massachusetts overwhelmingly selected Clinton.

I don't think I smashed Kennedy, just making a statement, which is apparently invalid in relation to the purpose of the post. Did not do my homework on Kennedy and still haven't, trusting your knowledge. Thought he endorsed after the MA primary.

I am a Democrat and if Obama wins most delegates from state primaries and caucauses and Hillary is chosen to run for President, I will be voting for McCain- never Hillary.And there are millions of voters just like me.
The reason?
She's about as dirty a politician as there is. She tears Obama down, and Obama has continued to be respectful. American voters can see this. OBAMA can beat McCain!! No problem!!!

This type of attitude is one reason why I posted this information.

It is not that Richardson did anything wrong, it is that some people only want the super delegates to vote for/against the voters of their state if the super delegates vote for their candidate. The point is, as with Richardson, the super delegates can vote however they want and there is nothing wrong with that.

Isn't Clinton herself telling pledged delegates that they should vote for who they personally want instead of honoring the caucus or primary results?

I suspect she is and, as I said before, so what? Again, Richardson is a perfect example as to why it is okay. People should remember it was after Carter's run for re-election where Kennedy ran against him (for some ridiculous reason) that the super delegates came into play.

The 1980 convention was notable, as it was the last time in the 20th century that either major party that a candidate tried to get delegates released from their voting commitment. This was done by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., Carter's chief rival for the nomination in the Democratic primaries, who sought the votes of delegates held by Carter.

Some Democrats believed that these changes had unduly diminished the role of party leaders and elected officials, weakening the Democratic tickets of George McGovern and Jimmy Carter. In 1982, a commission chaired by former North Carolina Governor Jim Hunt created superdelegates.

bill young's picture

ok

bizgrrl thought you knew Ted Kennedy endorsed Obama before the Ma. primary because you posted comments about Caroline Kennedy's endorsement of Obama in the NYT...right after the SC primary.

Sen.Kennedy & Caroline Kennedy appeared the next day at a Obama rally.

So it was nonsensical to me that you would say what you did about Inoway & O'Malley for doing the same thing Kennedy did.

But you didnt know because you didn't do your homework.

So,no,you did not smash Kennedy.

With respect to 1980..I was for Kennedy.

The '80 convention fight was over the "robot rule"

The robot rule BOUND delegates to the candidate
that they were pledged to in the caucuses & primaries

never been done before or since.

Kennedy was making a last gasp bid to win the nomination & challenged the rule on the floor.

Kennedy lost the robot rule challenge & quit the race that night.

Joe Trippi,worked for Edwards this time,worked the floor for Kennedy.

Harold Ickes,whose running Clinton's super delegate operation,also worked for Ted Kennedy in '80.

fyi..there was a story in the N-S op ed page about the robot rule

this week or last week by Susan Eldridge.

Up Goose Creek's picture

Margin of error

If the superdelegates are required to vote as their constituents, why even have them. Why not just increase the number of state delegates?

I don't like the superdelegate rule but they're there and they are part of the rules all candidates were aware of going in.

To me it comes down to margin of error. If the candidates are close, It won't bother me if the SDs tip the balace in either direction. If one candidate comes with in a hundred or 2 of the nomination and the SDs tip it the other way, I'll be unhappy with the process.

Either way I'll vote for the D candidate.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

Anonymous's picture

Do the Math

Here is the reason that Hillary will win and Obama will loose.

Hillbilly Math

(link...)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives