Sat
Aug 4 2007
06:22 pm

I used to get some letters published in the Metro Pulse, but with their new owners, I suspect I'll be blackballed there just as I have been at the News Slantinel.

So, here's the original letter in the current Metro Pulse--to be found under the mysterious title "Gu-wrong": (link...)

And here's my reply, which will meet its fate as my first blog entry:

Mac McAdams wrote an interesting letter about the movie “Sicko” and health insurance in the current (8/2/07) issue of the Metro Pulse. And while I disagree with Mr. McAdams on two of his points, I strongly concur on two others.

Health care is in fact free in Canada, Britain, France, and all other democratic countries—just like public libraries, fire and police departments, and most highways in the US. When you need a cop, a firemen, a library book, or a doctor you should never be asked for money. All of these public services are of course funded by taxes, but it might interest Mr. McAdams to know that the taxes used to fund universal health care in these countries add up to far less than the private insurance premiums, co-pays, and deductibles that most Americans pay—if they’re lucky enough even to have health insurance, as about 45 million Americans do not.

The answer to why wealthy celebrities and world leaders come to the US for medical treatment is simple: We have very good specialized doctors and hospitals, if you can afford them. Unlike a growing number of Americans, these rich foreigners can easily afford high-level American care. (Still, keep in mind the experience of Canadian comedian Dana Carvey, who had a heart operation in San Francisco during which the surgeon replaced the wrong artery.)

Mr. McAdams is correct, though, in observing that the US does not have to worry about “running an almost three billion dollar debt this year like France”; instead, we can look forward to paying over a trillion dollars, that’s trillion with a “t,” to pay for George W. Bush’s insane war in Iraq. The government of France wisely refused to get involved with that disaster, leaving them with funds to provide health care for their citizens instead of the death and destruction that our tax dollars are reaping.

I would also agree with Mr. McAdams that we do not “want the government that is running months behind issuing passports to provide our healthcare, . . . the government that took a week to get water to the Superdome.” In order to provide quality, universal health care and other necessary programs, we Americans will have to start electing competent governments, ones who don’t put “Heckuva Job Brownies” in charge of essential services. You know, like the French have figured out how to do.

Carole Borges's picture

Nice work Virgil...

Getting banned isn't the worse thing--

Canpflier's picture

Well, I don't think this is the answer...

So, you want a national health plan, eh? Well, let's take a look at what it's like to have a car wreck in the UK:

(link...)

Tamara Shepherd's picture

Familiar spending pattern

Sounds like the UK is now spending too much on "defense" and too little on healthcare, too. Wonder who prompted them to change course?

SammySkull's picture

Wow, great link, Canpflier,

Wow, great link, Canpflier, pointing out that our system, mired as it is in profit over concern, is somehow something because you have a link that proves that Americans aren't the only people willing to put profit ahead of basic concern. And your point is?

WhitesCreek's picture

Wingers seldom read the links they refer us to:

"We recognise that a very small number of patients may wait to receive appropriate care.

"This is because they need very specialised treatment, and critically ill patients waiting for treatment is the exception rather than the rule."

This is true in America as well, with the addition that a shameful percentage of our citizens will not receive adequate treatment at all.

Winger comprehension often appears to be rather low, don't you think?

Carole Borges's picture

That one story can hardly be seen as a system evaluation

Sure there are problems in healthcare no matter where you are, but this one story doesn't prove everyone in Britain is waiting weeks or months to have a broken bone fixed.

Here's a similar artcle on the long waits in our system.http://ezraklein.typepad.com/blog/health_of_nations/index.html

It says, "The LA Times reports that uninsured adults in Los Angeles are waiting more than a year for gallbladder and hernia surgeries. Indeed, the Harbor-UCLA medical center just told the county's clinics to simply stop referring non-emergency gallstone, hernia, orthopedic, or neurosurgery patients till the hospital worked through its year-long backlog."

I for one would like to see a national governmental health system. As someone who has been and knows of many people getting screwed by the private health insurance systems here now, I'm willing to take my chances.

A national health plan is not a "communist", oh dread of all dreads,idea as the rightwing media would like you to think. It could stop greedy corporations from making skyrocketing profits off sick little old ladies and gents.

What we're doing now is simply not working.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

      Wire Reports

      Lost Medicaid Funding

      To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

      Search and Archives