Wed
Jun 27 2007
07:02 am

ORNL was selected as the site of a $125 million federal biofuels research and development project. The project will study cellulosic ethanol production and involves UT and several other parters at the state-funded Joint Institute for Biological Sciences. Andrew Eder has the story.

Personally, I've been opposed to the idea of ethanol. It sounds great to rural voters, though, so the politicians love to talk about it, especially Republicans in the Red States. But if you think about it, it's a step backwards to a more primitive technology. Instead of feeding hay to our horses we'll be feeding corn and switchgrass to our cars, and it still leaves us on the internal combustion dead end.

And, is topsoil really a renewable resource? How many millions of years did it take to make the rich, fertile topsoil of the Great Smoky Mountains and the Tennessee Valley? And what about the crop failures this year? Imagine what ethanol would cost at the pumps with shortages like that.

What we should be researching is efficient, distributed solar power (we've had plenty of that this year!), alternative propulsion, hydrogen fuel cells and hydrogen generation and distribution, safe nuclear fission, cold fusion, antigravity, impulse power and warp drives and all that kind of stuff.

But I am resigned to the fact that ethanol is inevitable. (Every car in the Indy 500 ran on 100% ethanol this year, so it must work OK.) And I suppose paying a farmer in Kansas or Tennessee for fuel instead of funding terrorists and fighting wars in the Middle East is an improvement. And I suppose it's a viable "bridge" technology until something better comes along. So I suppose it's a good thing that ORNL and East Tennesee can cash in on some R&D action.

In case you were wondering what I think and what not.

Mykhailo's picture

And, is topsoil really a

And, is topsoil really a renewable resource? How many millions of years did it take to make the rich, fertile topsoil of the Great Smoky Mountains and the Tennessee Valley?

This particular point, at least, isn't an issue. Switchgrass is a perennial, with very deep roots (like, up to 6 feet+ deep), so growing it not only stabilizes soil, but actually promotes soil development.

R. Neal's picture

Did not know that. Thanks!

Did not know that. Thanks!

Mykhailo's picture

There's a nice picture on

There's a nice picture on the second page of this .pdf from The Land Institute showing the roots of annual wheat over the year compared to intermediate wheatgrass, a perennial species. It's pretty striking.

(link...)

The Land Institute, btw, is an interesting outfit. The founder, Wes Jackson, is on a holy crusade, fueled by his deep Methodist faith, to overturn what he sees as the worst mistake the human race has made -- relying on annual species for the bulk of our food -- and replacing it largely with a mixed cropping system of perennial grains, legumes, and other species (like sunflowers) that more closely resembles real ecological systems.

It's an idea that I imagine has huge visceral appeal to most every plant ecologist, and I actually seriously considered applying for a job there way back when. But...looking briefly at their website, it appears that after 25-30 years of research, they haven't really made any significant headway towards beginning to breed away the huge stumbling blocks of perennial polycultures. Still, definitely worth a look and some cogitation when you have time.

R. Neal's picture

Mykhailo, that's some

Mykhailo, that's some fascinating stuff that I had never heard about. Very interesting and thanks for the link.

I wonder if the lack of significant progress has anything to do with ADM and Monsanto et. al. not yet figuring out a way to make money on it, or what it might to do their existing business?

Maybe they will have to rethink their business model, and go on a licensing/royalty basis or something.

Factchecker's picture

I'd guess that NASCAR uses

I'd guess that NASCAR uses ethanol mostly because of its higher octane. If there are more pit stops due to ethanol's lower specific energy, it's equal between competitors and the extra pit drama is probably a big plus.

To keep beating my same drum, I hate the folly of corn ethanol. Mostly because it's such a red herring promoted and lobbied by big, profit drunk agri-business which doesn't really care about the environment or whether we use ultimately less or more fossil fuels than we already do.

Corn is about the worst ethanol feedstock, from what I've gathered; the move toward it has nothing to do with energy independence or the environment.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives