UPDATE: The photo in question appears to have been removed.
A.C. Kleinheider or someone at Nashville's WKRN-TV News2 has improperly made a copy of a copyrighted photo from this website and hosted it on WKRN's servers from where it is republished without permission in violation of U.S. copyright law under USC 17.
Read more...
Unfortunately the photo copyright isn't registered, so the owner isn't eligible for statutory damages of $150,000 per infringement. The owner is, however, due actual and compensatory damages. I hereby demand one double Glenlivet on the rocks as compensatory damages. (And this shall not be construed as establishing the value of any other copyrighted works by the author. Heh.)
But seriously, let's all be respectful of one another's intellectual property. I wouldn't copy a WKRN-TV News2 report or video without permission. Bloggers should expect the same courtesy from WKRN-TV News2.
I don't generally agree with A.C. Kleinheider very much, but he does run a good and entertaining and sometimes informative blog. This is not one of those times. I'm a little puzzled by the nature and/or the point of his post and the photo he selected from among the many photos available to him from this site. If he had just asked, I would have said fine, as I usually do when people go to the trouble to, you know, ask.
His response is, "I consider what I did to be proper Internet etiquette. If you believe you have a legitimate legal grievance you are more than welcome to contact the station."
Typical big-media v. little guy response. We've got deep pockets and lawyers. You don't. Bring it on. When it's all over, we'll still be here. You won't.
(Footnote: I also find his response interesting in light of the fact that his 'about' page says A.C. Kleinheider is responsible for everything on his blog and WKRN has nothing to do with it. Yet when a question of propriety comes up, he refers you to the station. So which is it? A.C. Kleinheider or WKRN?)
|
Topics:
|
|
Discussing:
- Are Chat bots a waste of time? (1 reply)
- Smith & Wesson noise problem (1 reply)
- Musicians dropping out of President's Freedom Concert Series (1 reply)
- It's time for new blood in Congress, Barnett in - Burchett out (1 reply)
- Burning Down The House... (2 replies)
- Behind Lege Lies (1 reply)
- Peace (1 reply)
- Speak your truth, fight and believe. (1 reply)
- Large banks have too much AI data center debt? (1 reply)
- GOP misleading on federal health care funding (1 reply)
- Feds indict civil rights group (3 replies)
- Georgia issues burn ban, first time in state history (2 replies)
TN Progressive
- Smith & Wesson not a good fit for Blount County (BlountViews)
- Pellissippi Parkway extension delayed again (BlountViews)
- Blount County early voting record turnout (BlountViews)
- Louisville, TN, town center coming soon? (BlountViews)
- WATCH THIS SPACE. (Left Wing Cracker)
- America As It Is Right Now (RoaneViews)
- A friend sent this: From Captain McElwee's Tall Tales of Roane County (RoaneViews)
- The Meidas Touch (RoaneViews)
- Massive Security Breach Analysis (RoaneViews)
- (Whitescreek Journal)
- My choices in the August election (Left Wing Cracker)
- July 4, 2024 - aka The Twilight Zone (Joe Powell)
TN Politics
- Providers scramble as Tennessee tells sick, disabled immigrant kids they will be reported (TN Lookout)
- Bloody UFC cage match on White House lawn marks Trump’s 80th birthday (TN Lookout)
- Local Tennessee officials are putting data center plans on ice to consider regulations (TN Lookout)
- Judge blocks Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund until government agrees it’s been dissolved (TN Lookout)
- Five laws passed by Tennessee lawmakers in 2026 face legal challenges, so far (TN Lookout)
- Tennessee’s “Nuclear Family Month” is a slap in the face of dads fighting for their children (TN Lookout)
Knox TN Today
- Abby Ham reflects on 23-year journalism career and new entrepreneurial journey (Knox TN Today)
- Wallace Real Estate expands regional reach with Bristol-based historic property specialist (Knox TN Today)
- Smoke alarms: What every household should know (Knox TN Today)
- Above & Beyond: Libraries let readers “Check Out” a person instead of a book (Knox TN Today)
- 6/16 HEADLINES: News and events from Knox, World, USA, Tennessee & Historic Notes (Knox TN Today)
- MC Computer Programming Team earns success in competition (Knox TN Today)
- How an automatic savings plan can help you reach financial goals (Knox TN Today)
- The necktie started with French nobility (Knox TN Today)
- Famous DGG is out there, DeSean Bishop is here (Knox TN Today)
- Thomas Cole: New KFD Asst. Chief, 134th Wing’s Chief Master Sergeant (Knox TN Today)
- Chris Bryant + Winston Fellows + D-Day for Derek Dooley ++ (Knox TN Today)
- Meet Miley, Monday’s Parent-A-Child (Knox TN Today)
Local TV News
- Construction begins on new animal shelter in Anderson County (WATE)
- 17-year-old accused of killing Lenoir City teen indicted (WATE)
- Where does the Summer Wells case stand, five years later? (WATE)
- 'It's gotten complicated' Farragut residents divided over potential permanent closure of Boring Road (WATE)
- 'A lot of questions' Cleanup continues in Morgan County after train derailment (WATE)
- Federal rules complicate push for I-75 noise wall for Knoxville neighborhood (WATE)
News Sentinel
State News
- Lawyer Meredith Mochel launches campaign for Red Bank city judge - Chattanooga Times Free Press (Times Free Press)
- Teen charged in connection with disappearance of Collegedale man - Chattanooga Times Free Press (Times Free Press)
- Vols’ new strength coach may play key role in Baylor star DGG’s decision - Chattanooga Times Free Press (Times Free Press)
- Chattanooga’s July 4 drone show needed federal approval due to Spanish national team - Chattanooga Times Free Press (Times Free Press)
Wire Reports
- 8 Dead in B-52 Bomber Crash at Edwards Air Force Base in California - The New York Times (US News)
- Trump’s name is off the Kennedy Center, but a tarp is hiding the proof - The Washington Post (US News)
- Bank of Japan hikes rates to highest since 1995 as yen languishes at historic lows - CNBC (Business)
- Inside the fight over Claude Mythos 5 - The Verge (Business)
- Alaska boots second Dan Sullivan from Senate race - The Washington Post (US News)
- Live Updates: U.S.-Iran deal signed by Trump and Iranian negotiator, U.S. officials say - CBS News (US News)
- Oil falls as markets weigh return of supply, US-Iran peace deal - Reuters (Business)
- Online portal used to send US deliveries to Cuba stops taking orders - AP News (Business)
- Exclusive | GM in Talks to Supply Weapons Parts to Lockheed Martin - WSJ (Business)
- Anna Kepner's Stepbrother in Custody After Judge Revokes Pretrial Release - TMZ (US News)
- Commentary: Trump goes after Newsom's wife? Unsurprising, but also a new level of authoritarianism - Los Angeles Times (US News)
- Algae Is Turning the Reflecting Pool Green. Again. - The New York Times (US News)
- Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Has State AGs Seeing More Than Just Antitrust Issues - Deadline (Business)
- Nvidia Stock Retakes Key Level As Chipmaker Plans Bond Offering - Investor's Business Daily (Business)
- Israelis angry over U.S.-Iran peace deal lash out at Netanyahu - PBS (US News)
Local Media
Lost Medicaid Funding
Search and Archives
TN Progressive
Nearby:
- Blount Dems
- Herston TN Family Law
- Inside of Knoxville
- Instapundit
- Jack Lail
- Jim Stovall
- Knox Dems
- MoxCarm Blue Streak
- Outdoor Knoxville
- Pittman Properties
- Reality Me
- Stop Alcoa Parkway
Beyond:
- Nashville Scene
- Nashville Post
- Smart City Memphis
- TN Dems
- TN Journal
- TN Lookout
- Bob Stepno
- Facing South
Emily Python
Bleedin' etiquette don't enter into it.
Liberty and justice for all.
He's wrong about it, too
Read the Internet rules of the road embodied in the Internet Engineering Task Force's RFC 1855:
(link...)
"Respect the copyright on material that you reproduce."
I say he ran afoul of this one on etiquette bounds, ethical bounds, and by the ToS explicitly stated here. If that photo was registered, you can bet there'd be legal bounds as well.
____________________________
Wasabi peas are people! They're people!
If that photo was
If that photo was registered, you can bet there'd be legal bounds as well.
There are legal bounds. Civil and criminal. The photo (or writing or whatever) is copyrighted the instant the shutter releases (or pen is put to paper, etc.). The trouble is, registration is necessary to collect statutory/punitive damages, as I understand it. Otherwise you are still eligible for actual damages, which are hard to prove.
Read & Understood.
You and I both make considerable effort and expend significant capital to cultivate an audience for our visual artwork. I get it.
However, if he's going to hang his hat on "netiquette..."
(a) There's a legitimate difference of opinion on what constitutes proper "netiquette."
(b) You've called him on it
(c) He's said, in so many words, "Too bad."
Now, if this was a matter of manners?
He'd say, "Oh, I didn't realize you felt that way. May I please use your work, and how would you like to be attributed?"
And if you still said no, and still insisted he could do as he pleased, then he's not following proper etiquette of any kind (Internet or otherwise). At that point, he would be, as we say in etiquette circles, an "asshole."
____________________________
Wasabi peas are people! They're people!
Oh, I agree with you 100% on
Oh, I agree with you 100% on the etiquette issue. I was just being technical on the legal issue.
WKRN's ToS
Well, here's WKRN's ToS:
These are the terms he's bound to while using WKRN as a host.
(link...)
____________________________
Wasabi peas are people! They're people!
I can buy the etiquette
I can buy the etiquette angle but I'd say fair use may be applicable. But then, I'm no lawyer.
---
SayUncle
Can't we all just get a long gun?
What metulj said. In
What metulj said. In addition, fair use typically applies to quoting excerpted text, such as a portion of a newspaper article or book for editorial comment, and only then with attribution. It not a defense for copying entire photographs.
Ok, then. Good to
Ok, then. Good to know.
---
SayUncle
Can't we all just get a long gun?
The only exceptions might be
The only exceptions might be for educational purposes, as schools and universities, which I believe have wider latitude.
Then how does, say, the
Then how does, say, the press get away with publishing someone's copyrighted logo or pic with a story? I can't imagine they get permission every time.
---
SayUncle
Can't we all just get a long gun?
What kind of photo are you
What kind of photo are you talking about? As for logos, I don't see that very often. But I imagine they do indeed get permission. If it is included in a press release sent voluntarily to the publication, or available on a corporate website's press info section for download and it's used according to whatever persmissions are granted and whatever restrictions apply they are covered.
P.S. Logos fall more under trademark law. And if a blogger or newspaper or magazine wrote a negative article about a company and included their logo without permission, you can bet they would hear from the company's lawyers.
As a for instance, the
As a for instance, the typical press report about some scary product. They usually show the product or it's logo and I doubt they get permission since no one is going to give permission to have their product bashed. Or the 911 photo of the firefighters raising the flag. They say it's copyrighted but I've seen that photo a lot. And, based on something I saw on TV, I know permission wasn't granted.
---
SayUncle
Can't we all just get a long gun?
Those are good examples. I
Those are good examples. I think something like the product example would come under the exception for news reporting, but I'm no lawyer so I'm not sure. None of this is comparable, however, to copying my photo and using it without permission. In this case, the violator has taken my work on original news reporting without permission.
As for the firefighter photo, that's a good example of how owners are responsible for enforcing their copyrights. Nobody else is going to do it for them. And failure to do so doesn't make it public domain. I'm guessing it gets tracked down often enough, though.
Then how does, say, the
Then how does, say, the press get away with publishing someone's copyrighted logo or pic with a story?
A lot of news agencies pay for the use of photos through bulk fees or through an association (like the Associated Press has its own legion of photographers, e.g.). Anything that an AP photog does which s/he sends out on the wire is considered "work for hire" and is paid for by the news agency's subscription to the feed.
Also, there are a lot of pictures that are "free for commercial use" stock.
As far as Thomas E. Franklin's picture from the WTC, or anything else he's ever done, here's the information you need in order to reproduce his work.
____________________________
We'll even the score in WW IV
Oh, and add .htaccess
I may just do this on my new PHP site.
(link...)
____________________________
Wasabi peas are people! They're people!
copyright resources
Here are some helpful resources on copyright, for those who are interested:
14 Copyright Tips for Bloggers - (link...)
Bloggers Cautioned on Copyright Concerns - (link...)
EFF: Legal Guide for Bloggers - (link...)
Bloggers Beware: Debunking Eight Copyright Myths of the Online World - (link...)
Copyright and Fair Use - (link...)
Librarian's Index to the Internet: Copyright - (link...) - tons of links to good resources here
for SayUncle...
I think there are certain fair use exceptions for criticism, commentary, and news reporting. Not sure if the news reporting bit is an extension of the criticism and commentary bit, or has it's own place in copyright law. But it's very complex, and I'm not a lawyer. If I find a clear explanation, I'll send it along.
Send him an Invoice.
GAG?
Is there a local GAG chapter? I just submitted an application for the at-large group. Any local GAG members out there? Msg me if your one of them!
Actually, I have to agree
Actually, I have to agree with the guy. While he could've and maybe should've given you explicit credit for the photo, he did link back to your article. He also didn't externally link to your photo and use your bandwidth, but instead copied it over to his own servers.
watermarks?
Perhaps a nice watermark would help? I still don't agree with what he did, but a watermark would at least ensure proper credit.
doesn't matter if he gave credit
Paul,
It doesn't matter if he gave a linkback or credit. He didn't have permission to use it, a copyrighted work. Same thing with copy/pasting whole news articles, books, etc.
Contact the station.
I think they would be interested in knowing that the guy is posting pictures he does not have the right to. If you started images images of the station's, they would be pissed.
Missed it
Didn't everyone hear? In one of his signing statements, President Bush made a "proper Internet etiquette" (whatever that means) exception to the copyright law.
Copyright infringements are frequent on the Internet. But I'd like to think that most people, when notified, acknowledge what they did or seek permission. I'm not sure why this blogger thinks offering gibberish is a good response.
Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.