Should they not have lobbyists?

Should they not have lobbyists?

Should they not have lobbyists?

Did I say they shouldn't? Shouldn't? Shouldn't?

Why does StudentsFirst think TN teachers should be evaluated 4X annually--and newer teachers 6X annually--when our First to the Top law calls only for a teacher's single annual evaluation?

My son attends a local high school employing 85 teachers, such that the school's principal now has to conduct AT LEAST 340 teacher evaluations annually over the 173-ish day school year.

That's two teacher evaluations per day, every day, if not more.

Why, Zach? Zach? Zach?

And after you've attempted a plausible explanation for why any teacher should be evaluated up to 6X annually--or for why any principal should conduct two teacher evaluations daily, on each and every day of the school year--I have a second question:

TCA 49-1-302 enacting the new teacher evaluation law does not specifically advise that charter schools may not request waivers from the law of the Education Commissioner. Neither does TCA 49-13-105, which lists regs the EC cannot waive for charters, make any mention of his inability to waive the new teacher evaluation law for charters. A couple of education associations I've spoken with about this oddity share my perception that the EC CAN therefore entertain a charter school's request for a waiver from the new law.

Why would we want to allow that of charter schools?

Shouldn't teachers in both traditional AND charter schools be evaluated 4 to 6X annually, Zach? Zach? Zach?

As far as I know, TEA has only two full-time lobbyists on staff, Jerry Winters, who is retiring this year, and Antoinette Lee.

A mutant tapeworm was discovered in Conn and Missouri that, once ingested by it's hosts in the state legislature and departments of education, it feeds on public education expenditures. It grows in size relative to its diet. Scientists are calling it MichelleRheeTapeworm. The MR worm is nearly indistinguishable from the common tapeworm Cestoda. Unlike it's cousin Cestoda that needs 2 hosts to survive, the MR worm does not need an intermediate host. Once it infects the anus of it's first host, it spreads to other hosts through a handshake. Some scientists suspect MR mutates into new forms as soon as it is transmitted, making it difficult track and eradicate. Scientists suspect the source of the outbreak was in FL; Jeb Bush patient zero. There is some dispute as some have evidence that patient zero is Joel Klein, Rupert Murdoch's lawyer. (link...)
It has spread through the south and is now infecting up to 23 states and Washington, DC.

(link...)

(link...)

It's appetite is insatiable.

(link...)

The latest report on Michelle Rhee shows her collecting millions of dollars from Wall Street financiers, assorted billionaires, and mega-foundations, all to redesign American education as she sees fit. (link...)

Memphis is the next city to be hollowed out by corporate edu-reformers:
(link...)

The TEA has been a effective lobby over the years. The landscape in Nashville has changed dramatically over the last few years and the TEA need to adapt. Sadly it appears as if they have doubled down on there old ways. Thus, they should not be surprised if they continue to get the same results for their efforts.

Horrible grammar.Should read "needs" and "their". Typing to fast..

Zach,
The AMA employs doctors to lobby.
The ABA employs lawyers to lobby.
TEA employs teachers to lobby. Until now.
The "new" education reformers employ private profiteers to lobby.

In April, 1999, the Wall Street financiers at Merrill Lynch published a 193 page “In-depth Report” titled “The Book of Knowledge, Investing in the Growing Education and Training Industry.” Early in the report they noted: “The K-12 market is the largest segment of the education industry with approximately $360 billion spent annually or over $6,500 per year per child. Despite the size, the K-12 market is the most problematic to invest in today. Entrenched bureaucracies and personal and political interests contribute to the challenges facing this sector.”

Reading comprehension question. Select the correct answer:
Why would the "new" edu-reformers lobby for invalid, unscientific, expensive, exclusionary education mandates that are doomed to fail children in public schools?
a. Hubris
b. Ignorance
c. Greed
d. Political aspirations
e. All of the above

Zach, under the pretext of edu-reforms, may you and your friends prosper off the backs of our poorest children by funneling UNACCOUNTABLE tax dollars to third parties (e.g. felon Michael Milken's TEAM/TAP fraud.) Sleep well.

Jonathan Kozol, Harpers (2007)

(link...)

Some years ago, a friend who works on Wall Street handed me a stock-market prospectus in which a group of analysts at an investment-banking firm known as Montgomery Securities~described the financial benefits to be derived from privatizing our public schools. "The education industry", according to these analysts, "represents, in our opinion, the final frontier of a number of sectors once under public control" that "have either voluntarily opened" or, they note in pointed terms, have "been forced" to open up to private enterprise. Indeed, they write, "the education industry represents the largest market opportunity" since health-care services were privatized during the 1970s. Referring to private education companies as "EMOs" ("Education Management Organizations"), they note that college education also offers some "attractive investment returns" for corporations, but then come back to what they see as the much greater profits to be gained by moving into public elementary and secondary schools. "The larger developing opportunity is in the K-12 EMO market, led by private elementary school providers", which, they emphasize, "are well positioned to exploit potential political reforms such as school vouchers". From the point of view of private profit, one of these analysts enthusiastically observes, "the K-12 market is the Big Enchilada".