Good question. It works for the third-world cesspools we apparently aspire to become. And it would certainly be more cost effective. A little messier perhaps, but "normal" citizens don't have to see it or clean it up. We just have to go along.
Over the past 15 years the death penalty has repeatedly been proven to be:
- not a deterrent
- wrongly applied to innocent people http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17075302/?GT1=9033
- systematically preying on the poor and mentally ill
- selectively applied by the prosecutions
- more costly than keeping someone in jail for life.
- consuming district attorney resources to a degree that other crimes are not prosecuted.
- not the "closure for victims" families which it claims to be.
I think in less than a generation we'll look back at this period of American history and ask yourselves, "How could we sit by and let this happen?"
Over the past 15 years the death penalty has repeatedly been proven to be:
- not a deterrent
- wrongly applied to innocent people
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17075302/?GT1=9033
- systematically preying on the poor and mentally ill
- selectively applied by the prosecutions
- more costly than keeping someone in jail for life.
- consuming district attorney resources to a degree that other crimes are not prosecuted.
- not the "closure for victims" families which it claims to be.
I think in less than a generation we'll look back at this period of American history and ask yourselves, "How could we sit by and let this happen?"
Post new comment