Somebody's picture

Distractions

When Trump launched his Twitter attack against a TV personality this week, I suspected an effort to distract. But what did he want to distract from, I wondered? Mitch McConnell's healthcare fiasco was already being played out on center stage, so that wasn't it. A story that gets a little too close for comfort, though, that might be something that requires an avalanche of useless media frenzy to cover up. The Wall Street Journal isn't exactly a liberal rag that Trump can afford to label as "fake news" to defend himself. Even today, their opinion page is scattered with columns sympathetic to and supportive of Mr. Trump, so there's a golden baby there that Trump can hardly afford to flush with the news department's increasingly hazardous bath water.

Let's hope that once the long holiday weekend is over, it will be Trump's twitter storm that has lost the media's attention, and that the focus will be on this emerging story.

R. Neal's picture

I really thought this

I really thought this "Russian thing" would fizzle out and turn out to be much ado about nothing in terms of anybody being able to prove anything.

I am reassesing my opinion.

Also, I have to keep reminding myself that "it's not the crime, it's the cover up."

And, that investigations into two-bit real estate deals can uncover unrelated cans of worms. Who knows what investigations into international mega deals might uncover.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

"Much ado about nothing?" From the time Flynn asked for immunity in exchange for his testimony, it appeared he was hiding "something."

I've just fretted about how long it would take to conduct a full investigation, of Flynn in particular.

R. Neal's picture

You left out "in terms of

You left out "in terms of anybody being able to prove anything."

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

Oh, okay.

Well, provided Rosenstein doesn't get fired, I've just feared an unending succession of special counsel appointments, as Trump fired them one-by-one, and months or years of speculation on CNN.

So now we're both hopeful for a resolution. Good.

fischbobber's picture

In this case,

It's the crime. Using the presidency to manipulate and profit from the oil and energy sectors is illegal. If indeed that was the purpose of this.

20% of Russia's oil operation is a lot to be missing and rumored to be in Trumps control.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

All this is certainly a potential breakthrough in the investigation, but I have some concern that Peter Smith, the Republican "activist" who first approached cyber security guru Matt Tait for help, passed away earlier this year?

I do see in Tait's account that Smith was later accompanied in his meetings with Tait by someone named John Szobocsan? Hopefully, Sxobocsan can be interviewed/investigated in Smith's stead.

(Smith sure looks to have been the stranger one, though. According to LinkedIn, the two "activists" were involved together during 2015-2016 in a company called Corporate Venture Alliances (CVA) LLC, where Smith was Chairman and Szobocsan was Managing Director. Take a look, though, at the company website for CVA. Smith's bio there is notably heavy on his "experience" in public affairs and within the Republican party? How is this relevant to the company's purported venture capitalism???)

fischbobber's picture

Follow the money.

There are black holes in both Trumps personal and business finances as well as Russian banking and oil interests. The irony is that they seem to intertwine and create a massive conflict of interest and power-grab. They would also create a situation where Putin and Trump could manipulate markets for massive personal gain. As the pieces come together, more and more the "Isn't that odd?" pieces seem to point in that general direction.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

I really appreciate your posting this, Mike, as I sure wouldn't have known about it otherwise.

I had either CNN or MSNBC on most of the weekend, but caught no coverage whatsoever of these WSJ stories and the subsequent reports they generated.

CNN, in particular, is starting to gall me with their insipid coverage of just "today's Trump tweet"--while ignoring developments as big as this one?! Grr...

mjw's picture

MSNBC coverage

MSNBC covered the hell out of both of the WSJ stories on Thursday and Friday nights when they first broke, including having the reporter that wrote them on Rachel's show one night and Laurence O'Donnell's the other night. Also Brian Williams covered the stories on his shows both nights. Then Joy Reed covered them on her Saturday morning show (didn't see her show on Sunday, so I don't know if she covered it then).

MSNBC generally doesn't do in depth political coverage during the afternoons on the weekends, probably due to the difficulty of booking guests. They tend to skip around skimming stories lightly and leaning toward today's news rather than re-hashing the week. From what I've seen of CNN, they do the same. The experts are generally booked for evening weekday shows and morning shows on the weekend.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

On the subject of MSNBC's coverage, I stand twice corrected, mjw. A neighbor also told me this aft that Rachel covered it. I've been tuned to CNN primarily, but I did flip over to MSNBC several times over the weekend, specifically looking for this story, and apparently missed it. I now see that MSNBC still has two stories on this positioned prominently on their homepage.

I'm pretty sure CNN hasn't covered it, though. I had that station on for hours and hours, all weekend. Searched their website in vain, too, and did so again just now. It should have been their top story, but there's absolutely nothing there.

Mike Knapp's picture

As they say at Chik-filay

it's my pleasure. Glad to hear from MJW that MSNBC is also on this. With limited time and resources focusing on the Russian election ops issue which IMHO is the 21st century version of Flynn and all as Benedict Arnolds or as a later analog the Japanese Rikusentai landing and setting up a beach head in Tacoma aided and abetted by a propagandized GOP in tune with Russian flavored traditionalist ethnonationalism. Malcolm Nance's book The Plot to Hack America is a must-read btw. Suggest ordering it from a local store...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives