So basically, the conversation took place but because reports of who called who were wrong it never happened?

OK, then.

Also, maybe Daily KOS can analyze and debunk this:

(link...)

"fasten your seat belts..its going to be a bumpy ride"

Drink the kool-aid.

Raph Nader for President 2008!

This is about not being played by right-wingers.

So Obama's campaign shouldn't be taking the word of Matt Drudge, perhaps?

____________________________

With the possible exception of things like box scores, race results, and stock market tabulations, there is no such thing as Objective Journalism. The phrase itself is a pompous contradiction in terms.

Now it turns out that the original leak (although it doesn't appear to have been a calculated one, so he may even have misspoken) was that Clinton's campaign had called the Canadians to tell them the "redo NAFTA" talk was all just campaign rhetoric. Good grief.

From the Carpetbagger Report:
"Some Canadian news outlets reported last week that Barack Obama’s campaign had reached out to Canadian officials, telling them to effectively ignore Obama’s concerns about NAFTA, claiming the rhetoric was just political posturing. Those reports turned out to be false. Canadian news also noted that Obama aides had contacted the Canadian ambassador with the same message. That turned out to be false, too. Both Hillary Clinton and John McCain read almost identical talking points, but much of the accusations proved to be unfounded. Nevertheless, given the attention and scrutiny, the largely controversy had a fairly significant impact in Tuesday’s primaries.
Now, a new report out of Toronto suggests the original story may have left out some important details"

More here: (link...)

I don't know about ya'll, but I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!
There's shenanigans going here!

Take Care, Be Good and don't play in the street!

SteveMule