Mon
Nov 3 2008
12:22 pm

I was born in California, home of the ballot proposition, and one of my earliest political lessons happened when I went to the supermarket with my Mom. People often stood outside the store collecting signatures, and it felt good to live in a country so democratic that political participation went hand-in-hand with buying food.

On this particular day, however, there were two sets of people outside the store. Before we got to the ones with the petition, a pair approached us to warn that the petitioners were trying to fool us. Their group, with a pleasant name like "Citizens for our Coasts," was actually an industry group trying to erode coastal protections. They were being paid to gather signatures and were not actually part of a grassroots movement. I wasn't even half old enough to vote before I learned not to take political motivations at face value.

Not enough skepticism has been aimed at Knox Charter Petition, and the county is in danger of being fooled.

There has been a general sense of entitlement with these petitions, as if they deserve to be on the ballot merely because they were proposed. This has manifested itself in the flagrant lie that Commission "forced" KCP to bundle the amendments. I am embarrassed for my friends who have made this claim. KCP used deception in their signature gathering, not just by hiring workers with money from sources that are as far from grassroots as you can get, but by marketing the petitions as anti-nepotism measures. I believe that same sense of entitlement allows supporters to forgive this dishonesty.

KCP has also been opportunistic, seizing on a general sense of disgust. Ending the fiefdoms in the fee offices is a great goal, but it already happened. They just got busted by term limits after a long battle. Shrinking Commission will not exclude men like Scott Moore and Paul Pinkston; it will make opportunities for people like Amy Broyles and James McMillan vanish. Every commissioner gets to vote on what property tax rate they will pay, yet we are supposed to believe a school teacher voting on the global school budget is a threat to our fiscal integrity. The real conflict of interest -- developers and their cronies serving on commission -- is not addressed at all, but dangerous school teachers could be banished.

The end result of shrinking Commission will be eight fewer opportunities for ordinary citizens to serve, concentration of influence and a hardening of the power of parties. Many supporters have pointed to city government as a model for better practices, and adopting non-partisan elections would have been a wonderful, principled reform.

Speaking of principles, the fee offices really should be appointed, even Property Assessor. Since this was such a citizen-driven movement with so many people involved in the decisions made by KCP, I'm sure there are several KnoxViews readers who can explain why Property Assessor got dropped from that amendment in the eleventh hour. Or was that decision made by monied insiders behind the scenes?

sugarfatpie's picture

I heard it was Phil Ballard and his people who got it taken off

Didn't hear much of an argument from their side, though I'm sure there is one.

-Sugarfatpie (AKA Alex Pulsipher)

"X-Rays are a hoax."-Lord Kelvin

Lisa Starbuck's picture

Property Assessor

Yes, it was indeed Phil Ballard who got it taken off - the argument being that it was too much power for one person to control the main source of the county's revenue.

To me, the same argument applies to all. The gripe is that the fee offices were used as patronage machines in the past, which is true. Term limits will put a stop to that, at least every 8 years.

The problem is that with the mayor controlling the appointments, even MORE patronage power accrues to his/her office. It's just a political fact.

The amendment proponents say that the appointments have to pass through County Commission, so there is more control. The problem with that is that if one party/faction controls 6 commissioners, no problem with controlling the entire county, pretty much.

Also, while the mayor can hire/fire fee office employees at will, county commission can only fire FOR CAUSE.

Again, at a time when there are alleged abuses of power in the mayor's office, I can't believe we are talking about handing that office more power.

And it is true that the signatures were gathered mostly under false pretenses - the same way their ads don't talk about the controversial aspects of the amendments. Instead they focus on the no nepotism part and "more accountability," whatever that means.

Rikki is right - the real problem is CRONYISM in government - and the amendments do nothing to control that.

Rachel's picture

And it is true that the

And it is true that the signatures were gathered mostly under false pretenses

I can only speak from my own experience, but the nice young man who asked for my signature did NOT misrepresent what was in the petition. And he was a volunteer.

Anonymously Nine's picture

Nice young man...

I can only speak from my own experience, but the nice young man who asked for my signature did NOT misrepresent what was in the petition. And he was a volunteer.

Counterpoint:

(link...)

Well, the volunteer gentleman was honest, he said the Charter Amendments are about Metro Government. He seemed nice also. I don't think the issue is whether they were "nice". It was what they said.

Lisa Starbuck's picture

Petition Signature Gatherers

Absolutely there were some fine people who put in hard work to get signatures. But the KCP people knew from the beginning that they would not be able to get it done with volunteers - the majority of it was done by hired signature gatherers whose spiel was to "sign in order to get rid of nepotism."

Someone whose word I believe told me that she was told that one of the petitions was to "clean up the mayor's office."

Rachel's picture

I'm not arguing that other

I'm not arguing that other people may have had different experiences. I was just describing my own.

Ennui's picture

I voted no on 4. Sure it

I voted no on 4. Sure it would be nice to think that the people around here will always vote for a mayor of good character, but I'm not sold on that. Can anyone imagine the folks that will get appointed under say Hutch or the Ashe sequel?

Be careful what you wish for. Couple that with only six votes needed to get something passed on commission(provided 3 passes) and you will have a severely compromised government. Six votes isn't that many to strongarm, bribe, or otherwise cajole of commission. The current mayor, who should have zero capital and influence by this point has only sacrificed one real culprit in Werner. Otherwise, he has cast off two administrative positions and the Finch separation is still contested.

Let term limits work for a bit before giving the keys to any group, KCP included. We as voters didn't just fight battles with commission and the mayor's office to hand over influence to another group with an agenda.

Anonymously Nine's picture

Sage advice....

Let term limits work for a bit before giving the keys to any group, KCP included. We as voters didn't just fight battles with commission and the mayor's office to hand over influence to another group with an agenda.

Many people have said this. It is sage advice.

StaceyDiamond's picture

Thanks Rikki

I voted no on both, but I see arguments either way for appointed v. elected. Don't like seat reduction. The attitude I find among supporters is "smart people vote for the amendements and the rest are lumped in with Lumpy and Scoobie." I find Rikki saying no refreshing. As I've always said, let term limits work for a few years!! Should these things pass one bit of irony would be if Tim H. is the first mayor king. I don't think that's what these folks have in mind.

Anonymously Nine's picture

Yeah right, reform

Look like the who's who of the Anti-Vote group has gone public. The Sentinel calls them the 29 "Champions of Reform". Seems like an oxymoron since they want to take away your right to vote, but give them a hand anyway:

* Former state legislators Ben Atchley, Brown Ayres and Tom Jensen
* Former County Executive Tommy Schumpert
* Current County Commissioners Richard Briggs, Mark Harmon, Tony Norman and Finbarr Saunders
* Current City Council members Joe Bailey, Bob Becker, Joe Hultquist, Marilyn Roddy and Chris Woodhull
* Former County Commissioners Bee DeSelm, Pat Medley, Wanda Moody, Madeline Rogero, John Schmid and Larry Stephens
* Former school board members Phil French, Steve Hill, Paul Kelley, Margaret Maddox, Jim McClain, D.M. Miller and Tommy Prince
* Former county Finance Director Kathy Hamilton
* Former MPC Director Don Parnell
* Former city Law Director Jon Roach

That is a lot of people from the City and not many from the County. Looks like Metro. Again.

Anonymously Nine's picture

rikki was right...

I don't say that often.

Proof:

(link...)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives