Mon
May 3 2010
11:06 am

Party With a Party - The Daily Pulse:

The Democrats don't have any candidates running in commission primaries.

I'm tempted to make a joke here about the Dems' lack of "party cohesion," but it seems too obvious and corny, even for me. Sigh.

Are Sam McKenzie, Amy Broyles, Finbarr Saunders, and Eddie Evans in on the joke?

Anonymously Nine's picture

.

Carlson ain't no Charles Maldonado, that is for certain. His local knowledge is unbelievably weak. The Metro Pulse has changed a lot since being purchased by the dark side of the force.

And yesterday in the talking heads segment on "Tennessee This Week" Metro Pulse editor Jesse Mayshark said the Metro Pulse is better now than it used to be before the dark side purchase. Really? And then Mayshark said that presumed next County Mayor Tim Burchett was being lobbied to keep some of Mike Ragsdale's staff because, wait for it, "They are doing a pretty job good".

Someone should check the water supply to the coffee maker.

(link...)

Anonymously Nine's picture

.

I can't imagine that Tim Burchett appreciated Mayshark's comment much. But I think Mayshark's comment about the lobbying is spot on. The pretty good job part, not so much.

j.f.m.'s picture

Oh hi there 9

My point was that a lot of this campaigning on trust/transparency/accountability is reacting to stuff that happened two-three years ago, not stuff that's happening now. John Troyer gets generally pretty good marks from lots of people I've talked to, none of them particularly Ragsdale apologists. You can debate the wisdom of drawing on the rainy-day fund in this year's budget, but it's a pretty defensible choice given the options -- which would be more layoffs and cuts in public services. I agree with Korda (I know, shocking) that there's not much likelihood the next mayor will keep any senior Ragsdale staff. But it's interesting to me that some people feel good enough about the current state of things that they're advocating for it.

I also said, if you were paying attention, that just campaigning on trust/transparency/accountability is setting the bar pretty low. Those things are the minimum we should expect from public officials.

On the actual thread subject, as Frank said, the point was that there are no contested Democratic races in the commission primaries.

Anonymously Nine's picture

.

"I also said, if you were paying attention, that just campaigning on trust/transparency/accountability is setting the bar pretty low. Those things are the minimum we should expect from public officials."

Agree. Spot on.

"John Troyer gets generally pretty good marks from lots of people I've talked to, none of them particularly Ragsdale apologists."

Don't agree. Maybe the worst Finance Director we have had. The man evades direct questions from Commissioners. That is a dangerous game. You were gone in New York but Larry Van Guilder had a real row with Troyer and pointed out that Troyer could be fired via a clause in the County Charter that prohibits evading direct questions from Commission. And if I remember correctly Troyer called Larry a liar or something to that effect. This was last year at budget time. It is somewhere in the Archives of Larry's columns at the Shopper. You night want to look it up.

Today's Van Guilder column doesn't have much love for Troyer either but puts the weight on Ragsdale:

(link...)

Is it too much to ask that they get the number right when they raid the rainy day fund. That is pretty basic stuff.

Also, Lewis Cosby called Ragsdale out this morning over the budget in a Press Release:

(link...)

j.f.m.'s picture

Yeah

I know all that. I am just reporting what some sitting commissioners and others have said. I don't expect it will have much bearing on the makeup of the next administration, because I don't get the sense there's much enthusiasm from any of the candidates for keeping on board anyone who's associated with the Ragsdale brand.

(And by the way 9, I don't intend to get in endless back-and-forths with you here any more than on the Blab. I know how that ends up. Have a nice day.)

Anonymously Nine's picture

"And by the way 9, I don't

"And by the way 9, I don't intend to get in endless back-and-forths with you here any more than on the Blab. I know how that ends up. Have a nice day."

You are like Jack McElroy in that regard. "Listen to people who agree with you avoid the rest". Yeah, that makes for good journalism. You could learn a thing or three from Bill Lyons. Listening would make your paper a better product.

Oh, and Johnny Ringo says Hi. Apparently I am not alone in the club.

Frank Carlson's picture

re: Dem primaries

Those named by R. Neal are Dems running for election in the general, but there are no contested Democratic primaries in commission. Probably could have worded that better.

Pam Strickland's picture

Definitely could have worded

Definitely could have worded that better.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

Reserve-tapping/budget-cutting/tax-hiking

You can debate the wisdom of drawing on the rainy-day fund in this year's budget, but it's a pretty defensible choice given the options -- which would be more layoffs and cuts in public services.

Thanks for that, Jesse. Not sure I support Larry's call for new taxes in this environment of 10% (-ish) unemployment, nor Lewis' proposal to cut services while the county sits on tax revenues already collected and placed in a "rainy day" savings account. Sure feels like the "rainy days" are upon us right now...

WRT to this reserve-tapping option, though, does anyone know whether the county has to maintain some set level of "rainy day" funds, relative to the size of their budget? I know the school system has to maintain 3% of their budget in reserves, for instance.

I ask because the county's reserve balances appear to be running way more than 3% of their budget in recent years. Maybe 8% or so?

Anyway, provided taking from these two county reserve funds doesn't cause us to drop below statuatory minimums, the $$$ to maintain services is there already.

(Yeah, I realize the problem will be passed on to the next mayor to deal with. The next governor is in for the same rude surprise, I expect.)

GDrinnen2's picture

$9, one thing I can't seem to

$9, one thing I can't seem to wrap my brain around is the fascination with not spending any of the "rainy day fund".

Philosophically, should we NEVER spend money from the fund balance? If not, what's it for? If so, what would be an appropriate circumstance?

I have no doubt thee is lots of fat to be cut in numerous departments, from the mayor's office to the fiefdoms. Cosby is specifc in referencing the new position in the mayor's office and the positions of C.A.O. and C.O.S.

Very generously, that may save $500,000k

He also references take home cars and car allowances. He's not very specific here. Does this include property assesor vehicles? Administrative staff in the sheriff's office? Is it any and all throughout county government?

I have no idea how many cars that includes, and I'm assuming there is a big difference between stopping take home priveleges and selling vehicles. Want to stop the Law Director, Chief of Staff, CAO, etc. from having a take home car? I can go for that.

What about mileage? Since they will be driving their own cars, would the county reimburse mileage? They're getting paid a lot, so most would probably go along with that. Definitely some savings there.

What about codes enforcers? Not going to let them drive home? Ok. Surely, we'll not sell these vehicles though. How much will that really save?

Let's say this whole take unspecific take-home car issue Cosby proposes specifically to take place Sept 1 saves $1 million (this seems ridiculously high here, but benefit of the doubt).

That, generously, gives us $1.5 million in savings he's proposing. Good job. Way to go.

What about the other $16 million? How many more staff positions can we cut or cars do we need to sell? I'm guessing there aren't enough cars in the fleet.

I have absolutely no problem if Commission wants to buck up and demand some of these cuts be made BEFORE tapping the reserves. However, I don't see a way to make up the funding gap without a tax icrease or tapping fund balances. And as Tamara points out, isn't that what they are for?

I'd love someone to take a hard look at expenses AT ALL of county government (from engineering and parks to the mayor's office and fiefdoms), but so far Cosby's playing in the margins.

Anonymously Nine's picture

.

I love it. The Primary isn't even over and the Cosby Defense League has shown themselves. Looks like the KCP is solidly behind Burchett. No big surprise there.

What you refer to the "rainy day" fund has another descriptor, it is called operating capital. If you don't have enough operating capital you have to borrow to make payroll. We used to have a two month cushion. Now we have a one month cushion. You two rocket scientists want to reduce that? Real smart. Hopefully Tim Burchett won't be taking advice from either of you.

Anonymously Over You's picture

You are a Hutchison crony.

You are a Hutchison crony. Nuff said.

Anonymously Nine's picture

.

There are no Burchett crony's are there? Because Burchett is pure and just.

You would be surprised who I will write in for the office of County Mayor. His name won't be Tim.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives