Thu
May 1 2014
09:37 pm

The front page above the fold headlines in today's Knoxville News Sentinel seem to suggest that they support and defend police brutality...

In one front page article (subscription) required), they assert that "There was no indication [arrestee] Dotson lost consciousness." Seriously?

Presumably they are basing their conclusion on a questionable arrest report filed by a now suspended officer involved in the incident. Looks like we will have to wait for the arrestee's lawsuit, if there is one, for the truth to come out.

In another front page article (subscription required), they say cops were outnumbered by drunk college students. So the use of excessive force is clearly justified in response?

And also in today's paper, the editorial (subscription required) says "Sheriff Jones' swift action affirms a culture of accountability." So it's all good.

(To the KCSO's credit, the News Sentinel reports in the first article that the "restraint maneuver" is not taught or authorized by KCSO. But it apparently is by KPD. In which case it appears KPD needs a policy overhaul.)

And finally, tonight they run a hit piece (which will presumably be in tomorrow's paper) targeting Sheriff J.J. Jones' primary opponent. (The election will be decided in the primary next week.) They cite a 24 year old out of state racial discrimination complaint against Waggoner, which, if true, is troubling. But so is the timing of this hit piece. (Waggoner denies the allegations.)

Anyway, it seems pretty clear which way the political winds are blowing at the KNS. What's not clear is why any respectable journalist would work for them and allow this kind of stuff to be published under their byline.

Topics:
legalbeagle's picture

KNS is far less worried about police brutality...

than they are about the possibility that JJ could lose the election. Waggoner has mentioned a police report from Granger County with details on Frank Phillips holding a hispanic couple at gunpoint sometime in the last couple of years. Along with Phillips previous demotion from Sgt. back to Patrolman, it looks like JJ's "swift action" was a couple years too late.

If people turn out on Election Day, Waggoner could win this thing. It's not as earth-shattering as electing a qualified Democratic Sheriff in Knox County, but for the KNS, Chamber and others, it's close.

Hildegard's picture

KNS motives in publishing

KNS motives in publishing this story notwithstanding, as a voter I would want to know about a race-based lawsuit in a candidate's past. I voted for Waggoner, but tbh I would like to have known about the prior allegations of racism that resulted in several appeals and a settlement before I voted. Even if it was 24 years ago. I might have just not voted at all in that primary had I known (definitely never going to vote for Jones on anything).

Somebody's picture

WBIR broke the story on the

WBIR broke the story on the 42-year old Waggoner case a week or two ago, but ran it once with no follow-up. The KNS article doesn't seem to shed any new light on it, either. It is indeed troubling, especially because it is not at all clear whether it was evidence of racism on Waggoner's part, or a disgruntled employee, or something somewhere between. The timing of the revelations is also troubling, leaving the voter to wonder if there is a viable alternative to Jones in the primary or not. We do know there's no challenger in the general election, so that's really great, isn't it?

OldPol's picture

Anyone who knows Bobby Waggoner

knows he doesn't have a drop of racist blood in his body. In response to that KNS story about the 25-year-old lawsuit, Bobby explained that he had fired the woman in question for leaking information that botched a drug investigation his department had underway. An upper court dismissed the charges against him, but the railroad settled with the woman on the charges against the railroad. Her tendency to file lawsuits was apparently well known at the time, and the railroad did what, unfortunately, many businesses choose to do: pay to get rid of the hassle of dealing with the courts.
To me, the story is not troubling, because I know the facts, but is instead a reminder that KNS will stoop to any level to support a weak candidate the paper has endorsed. They're more worried about egg on their face than the truth.

OldPol's picture

Anyone who knows Bobby Waggoner

knows he doesn't have a drop of racist blood in his body. In response to that KNS story about the 25-year-old lawsuit, Bobby explained that he had fired the woman in question for leaking information that botched a drug investigation his department had underway. An upper court dismissed the charges against him, but the railroad settled with the woman on the charges against the railroad. Her tendency to file lawsuits was apparently well known at the time, and the railroad did what, unfortunately, many businesses choose to do: pay to get rid of the hassle of dealing with the courts.
To me, the story is not troubling, because I know the facts, but is instead a reminder that KNS will stoop to any level to support a weak candidate the paper has endorsed. They're more worried about egg on their face than the truth.

mdonila's picture

*

Your statements need clarification.

I don't know if Bobby is racist or not. I'm not going to weigh in on that.

That said, the investigation was not botched. It was actually a very successful investigation that resulted in a number of employees - all black - getting arrested for buying, selling using drugs.

Bobby got his information about the woman supposed leaking stuff from one of the people who was arrested. When he was called out on that, he then said that another person - third hand - also verified this. That other person under oath denied saying anything to Bobby.

The woman did not "have a tendency to file lawsuits." I'm not going to dig out the records, but she was involved in one class action lawsuit (or union lawsuit) filed against the company 20 years or so prior to the 1990 one.

An upper court didn't "dismiss the charges" against him. I'm not even sure what that means. There were no charges. It was a civil case. An upper court disagreed with the magistrate in that it said the woman's dismissal wasn't due to her race. That court by the way noted that Waggoner "did not hold black people in equal respect." Hardly dismissing charges.

The 11th Circuit then disagreed with that court.

As far as the settlement to "get rid of the hassle of dealing with the court," goes. Well, Southern Rail probably wasn't going to win once the 11th Circuit sent it back. They kept appealing until finally they exhausted everything.

At that point, they settled for seven figures.

legalbeagle's picture

This needs clarification too.

Average Guy's picture

In another front page article

In another front page article (subscription required), they say cops were outnumbered by drunk college students. So the use of excessive force is clearly justified in response?

I read that headline the same way. Its obviously a headline trying to make a point, but the attempt makes them look transparent and ridiculous.

Will they write the same article every game day Saturday?

Elwood Aspermonte's picture

Officer Phillips will probably get his job back after election

He may have to go through some additional training and be reassigned outside of the campus area, but from all indications, the only thing he did wrong was get a little aggressive with a loud mouth punk during the early voting period.

Average Guy's picture

Really?

Breaking a KCSO policy that states he's not allowed to perform the move he did is not wrong?

Huge leap from getting "a little aggressive" with an arm bar to fooling around with a handcuffed person's airway.

These things never appear to be a real problem, unless it's your kid.

Manster's picture

Nothing better

What's depressing is the only choices are once again to old white guys. Let's face it, neither Waggoner or jones are really good choices. Just a couple of guys riding the gravy train, with no interest in what are the challenges facing the county or how to deal with them.

MurrayK's picture

A point of clarification.

The maneuver employed by the erstwhile deputy was a cartoid artery compression and did not interfer with the suspect's airway but could have cause brain damage nonetheless.

Pam Strickland's picture

For the record, my Friday

For the record, my Friday column came out questioning what JJ would have done had there not been photographic evidence of the abuse, supportive of Waggoner's questions, and called for better training over body cameras.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives