Mon
Jul 28 2014
02:17 pm

NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 28, 2014
Contact: John Crooks
(Office) 865-637-3227 ext. 119 (Cell) 865-223-4513 jcrooks@emeraldcharterschools.org
DR. JON RYSEWYK HIRED AS FOUNDING PRINCIPAL OF EMERALD ACADEMY
Longtime educator to lead Knox County’s first public charter school
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. – Emerald Charter Schools (ECS) has hired Dr. Jon Rysewyk as the founding principal of Emerald Academy, a college-prep public school of choice for urban youth. Rysewyk, following a thorough process, was the unanimous choice of Emerald Charter Schools’ nine-member board of directors.

Rysewyk holds a bachelor’s degree in psychology and a master’s degree in education from the University of Tennessee, an education specialist degree in instructional leadership from Tennessee Technological University and a doctorate in educational leadership and policy analysis from East Tennessee State University.

“The hiring of Dr. Rysewyk as Emerald Academy’s founding principal is a huge step for Emerald Charter Schools,” said Steve Diggs, ECS board president. “Jon’s proven leadership experience in a turnaround school – in an urban setting – and his ability to ensure a strong and collaborative working relationship with Knox County Schools clearly made him the right choice to lead Emerald Academy.”

Dr. Rysewyk’s experience includes:
- Executive Director of Innovation and School Improvement, Knox County Schools, 2013-Present
- Supervisor of Secondary Education, Knox County Schools, 2012-2013
- Executive Principal, Fulton High School, 2008-2012
- Assistant Principal – Curriculum, Fulton High School, 2004-2008
- Teacher and Department Head, Karns High School, 2002-2004
- Teacher and Coach, Oliver Springs High School, 1999-2001

The selection of Emerald Academy’s founding principal was among the most important decisions the ECS board needed to make. The principal will be responsible for building relationships with families, recruiting students, hiring teachers and staff, serving as the instructional leader of the school and establishing productive relationships with Knox County Schools and other people and organizations throughout the community.

The first leader of the inaugural public charter school in Knox County also must have an entrepreneurial mindset, a willingness to take risks, a firm belief that Emerald Academy can close the achievement gap and alter the academic trajectory of its scholars and the commitment to ensure all students achieve at the highest level.

Based on Rysewyk’s impressive track record, credentials, and responses throughout the search process, the ECS board is confident it has found the right leader to serve Emerald Academy.

ECS’ principal search was conducted by a search committee composed of a subset of ECS board members: Guille Cruze, Ed Hedgepeth (committee chair), Sherra Robinson and Danielle South. Additional members of the ECS board include: Renda Burkhart, Steve Diggs, Randy Gibson, Tim McLemore and Alvin Nance.

About Emerald Charter Schools: Emerald Charter Schools is a new nonprofit organization formed to manage Emerald Academy. Emerald Charter Schools is a separate, non-sectarian organization started by Emerald Youth Foundation, which has a longstanding track record working with Knoxville’s inner-city children, teens and young adults. Accountable to state and federal academic standards, public charter schools are independently operated public schools that are tuition-free and open to every student who wishes to enroll.
###

Bbeanster's picture

This is a big, big hire.

This is a big, big hire.

michael kaplan's picture

salary?

salary?

interesting that it's Emerald Charter Schools plural.

cwg's picture

It's always been Emerald

It's always been Emerald Charter Schools plural, as I (and others) reported back in January. Emerald Academy is just the first of many planned schools under the ECS umbrella, some of which may use different models and/or be in other parts of the county.

gonzone's picture

First the camel gets its nose

First the camel gets its nose in the tent, next thing you know the camel is in the tent and you are not.

KC's picture

Kool Aid drinker par

Kool Aid drinker par excellence.

Bbeanster's picture

The reason this is big is

The reason this is big is because Rysewyk is so well-known and (I think) liked in the community where this school is to be established. He was a principal and assistant principal at Fulton and was the person most involved with the school's redesign (or whatever they call it) before being bumped up into admin. He is one of JMac's prized cogs.
First time I really covered him was when he won a $50K MIlken Award.

What I'd be curious about is his experience at the K-8 level.

bizgrrl's picture

Too bad Knox County Schools

Too bad Knox County Schools could not keep him.

Treehouse's picture

Peter Principle

"too bad Knox County Schools could not keep him"...out of administration. The best principals are really needed in the schools. I know some ineffective principals who have been "promoted" to the AJ Building where they don't seem to do much which is just as well.

Concerned's picture

Something Stinks

This is a big hire and one I'm sure was planned from day one. Note the author of this memo:
(link...)

Mike Cohen's picture

Emerald

Or it could be that it's some really good people who want nothing more than to help kids and believe they can do so with schools.

Someone can actually be good and good intentioned and just not agree with you on how things should be done.

Y'all are smart people...why do you insist on acting like anyone looking at a different approach is inherently evil.

Steve Diggs and his folks have walked the walk for a lot of years. There is nothing in their historic behavior to lead anyone to believe he has some big financial motive.

Trash the approach and the concept of charter schools all you want. That's a policy decision and fair game. But if you want to imply there is some hidden or financial agenda driving the Emerald folks maybe you should fine a single shred of evidence.

And I agree that it is too bad Jon R. is leaving Knox County because he is a total rock star. He was the guy who went to the Board and said he needed the school day to be longer at Fulton, he needed the kids for more time every day. Totally kid and results focused. I don't see him joining this organization for any reason other than he, too, believes he can more successfully help kids that need it.

KC's picture

Puh-leeze. Nobody's buying

Puh-leeze. Nobody's buying that anymore, except all the other sellers of that nonsense, and the willing tools who think they can somehow benefit.

Bbeanster's picture

You think the public schools

You think the public schools whose zones Emerald is targeting wouldn't have better results if they could afford to reduce class size, double the number of teachers and cream off the best, most involved parents?

It'll help the kids directly involved at the expense of a whole lot of others.

And, btw, have you noticed that McIntyre isn't nearly as in love with the standardized tests he's been cudgeling his teachers with now that KCS's numbers are sinking?

Average Guy's picture

TCAP vs CC

Heard McIntyre say on the radio yesterday he wasn't sure TCAP's would stay relevant as Common Core becomes the standard.

This in the face of Gates calling for a moratorium on CC.

What am I missing?

jcgrim's picture

Positioning to get PARCC back on the table

My guess is that Mc's is playing nice with Gates & working to influence support for getting the PAARC assessment back on the table following its 1 yr moratorium.

He justified the dismal TCAP scores in Knox CO & across the state by pointing out that the assessment is misaligned to TNCore (e.g. Common Core). Who wouldn't want an assessment that aligns with the curriculum? It's a clever argument for public consumption but avoids the immoral misuse of standardized test scores for high-stakes decisions.

Of course, he could never suggest that test scores dropped for a multitude of reasons: disruptions from constant staff transfers, school turn-arounds based on garbage data, teacher moral-busting conference-of-concerns, a cannibalistic TEAM eval system where the RUBRIC is ALWAYS accurate, test-and-punish, time-wasting meetings, overall school climate, and/or regression to the mean (this is not an exhaustive list)

These legitimate reasons don't fit his PR dept. soundbite word count.

Mike Cohen's picture

Emerald

Betty:

Your arguments about the issue of Charter schools, which is a legitimate discussion point.

I don't personally think Emerald is out to skim off the best students or those with the most involved parents. I think Steve will want to serve those who need help the most.

At any rate, my point was that I have yet to see any valid reason to believe that Steve Diggs and his organization have any real financial motive in this.

Not arguing about the issue...just defending someone I think has shown himself for years to be a good guy doing good work for the right reasons.

And they are not a client. I don't even see Steve but once in a blue moon.

michael kaplan's picture

At any rate, my point was

At any rate, my point was that I have yet to see any valid reason to believe that Steve Diggs and his organization have any real financial motive in this.

salaries?

Stick's picture

Considering that they are

Considering that they are following the "no excuses" charter school model of KIPP, LEAD, Aspire, Achievement First, etc., I would suspect that a 19th century pedagogy of mnemonic chants, songs, and memorization that is, shall we say, teacher-centric will play a big role in how the school runs.* This will most likely be coupled with a big focus on "character" brought to you by the new dressed up behaviorism called positive psychology or "grit". When you add in the cream skimming and likely high attrition rates, you'll see good test scores, but I'd be hard pressed to call it a quality education.

* Once local press and dignitaries start to visit the school this will no doubt be given that most empty of labels "innovative".

KC's picture

KCS's numbers are

KCS's numbers are sinking?

His answer on the radio was basically "sure TCAP scores suck, so the answer is Common Core. Trust me."

Hardly anyone trusts him in Knox County.

And the problem with Charter schools is the implied attack message: "Public schools aren't working ( and not because we run them as cheaply as possible), so we need Charter schools. We'll even get some new stakeholders in the disadvantaged communities to make rich, white guys seem caring and liberals feel all warm and fuzzy. Everybody will want our snake oil. Trust me."

michael kaplan's picture

We'll even get some new

We'll even get some new stakeholders in the disadvantaged communities to make rich

that's important

michael kaplan's picture

ALEC meets

ALEC holds its 41st annual meeting in Dallas, Texas starting on Wednesday, July 30, 2014. At this largest of its three annual national conferences, state legislators from across the country will meet with corporate and special interest lobbyists behind closed doors to vote on "model" legislation to change state laws.

(link...)

The "Public Charter Schools Act" would expand on ALEC's pre-existing "Next Generation Charter Schools Act" and enrich ALEC members like K12, Inc., the nation's largest provider of online charter schools or cyber schools. It would allow privately-operated charter schools to continue taking public funds, but without public accountability. The bill would give charter schools carte blanche to operate without being "subject to the state's education statutes or any state or local rule, regulation, policy, or procedure relating to non-charter public schools within an applicable local school district

The related "Public Charter Schools Funding Act" restates charters' autonomy from the rule of law and democratically-elected school boards while still giving each charter school "one hundred percent" of the state and federal education funding "calculated pursuant to the state's funding formula for school districts.”

Stick's picture

The wild west they hope to

The wild west they hope to create...

michael kaplan's picture

excellent piece. new orleans?

excellent piece. new orleans? detroit? memphis?

Bbeanster's picture

I'm not accusing Steve Diggs

I'm not accusing Steve Diggs of any chicanery. I do not believe he's doing anything he considers wrong.

My point is a philosophical one, with charter schools generally, especially in a revenue-poor district like KCS. This is a zero-sum game, Mike. Instead of 'follow the money,' the money will follow the student. Your fairy godmother's not going to wave her magic wand and refill the trough. Emerald will take $5 mil when its fully operational, and I expect that will adjust upward for inflation, like everything else.

When you say "I don't personally think Emerald is out to skim off the best students or those with the most involved parents. I think Steve will want to serve those who need help the most," you are missing the point. I do not believe that Steve Diggs has any intention of harming the public schools.

But who do you think attends informational meetings and fills out forms and signs onto the parent involvement requirement at a charter school? At Vine Middle, for example, they can hardly get parents to show up for PTA meetings and parent conferences. You seem pretty disconnected from reality in this regard.

Stick's picture

A focus on individual

A focus on individual personalities obscures the structural issues at hand.

Mike Knapp's picture

Roger that

Roger that

Mike Cohen's picture

Charter

Those are valid points. I tend to think Emerald has relationships with kids whose parents do not fit that profile, but it is worth asking.

I have no argument with what you raise or the entire Charter issue. I only took issue with those who pictured those involved as having evil or strictly financial motives, because I don't believe that is the case at all.

But the issue overall, and even specifics within this case, are worth discussing/debating.

Average Guy's picture

It's picking winners and losers with public dollars

When using public dollars, the goal should be the best use of the dollars in the most equitable way, right?

Does a system that sets up better schools for these kids while leaving those kids out do that?

Suppose Emerald shows remarkable gains, but those gains for whatever reasons can't be replicated in all schools.

Then what?

It'd be great if all public schools could have the resources and construct as a private school like Webb, but does it even make sense to believe they can? Especially in a region that has a fear of any raised taxes for the common good, much less education.

Mike Cohen's picture

Average guy

If kids at the Charter are helped but it can't be replicated at all schools....then at least some children have been helped.

fischbobber's picture

What???????

So we should all be grateful that those poor suffering Webb students are at least getting an opportunity? Is that what you're saying?

Look, anyone can cherry pick. It's why some on this board oppose magnet schools. And it's a legitimate point, but, there is a huge difference between allowing those students that want opportunity the freedom and slots to transfer within a tax-funded system, and the wholesale movement of cash to entities outside that system for private gain, no matter how sincere or altruistic the perpetrators of the scam appear to be.

If this is a good idea, it can succeed without taxpayer assistance, and the proponents of this idea know this. Charter Schools are nothing more than a way to steal public education from the taxpayer. Another public asset bites the dust.

Average Guy's picture

That's great,

only if no one else is hurt.

There are pros and cons to almost everything and I'm very comfortable in saying few to no cons were weighed in this little experiment that will become a much larger experiment.

jcgrim's picture

Don't forget developers in Emerald's empowerment zones

Emerald is smack dab in the middle of the federal empowerment zone, meaning banks make big bucks on construction & can double their money in 7 years with a 39% New Market Tax Credit.

Charters drain scarce funds that should go to the public schools into the 1%ers beach houses, tax lawyers, gated mansions, and inbreeding. Parthenon's flim-flam pitch to its investors should tell you all you need to know about who benefits from charters.

The reality for those kids & families in charters is disconnected from the hype sold by the financial masters of the universe. Poor children are NOT IN THIS BOY'S CLUB and will NEVER BE IN THE CLUB. The same liars who crashed the economy in 2008 are better at marketing hype & lies than academics. It's just sad that the media believes their think-tank press- releases rather than actual scholars on education.
Here's one example of charters in ALbany, NY:

They[hedge fund managers] have been contributing generously to lawmakers in hopes of creating a friendlier climate for charter schools. More immediately, they have raised a multimillion-dollar war chest to lobby this month for a bill to raise the maximum number of charter schools statewide to 460 from 200.
According to Gonzalez, “a nonprofit called the Brighter Choice Foundation had employed the New Markets Tax Credit to arrange private financing for five of the city’s nine charter schools.” By 2010, many of those charter schools were struggling to pay escalating rents, which were “going toward the debt service that Brighter Choice incurred during construction.”
examples of the escalating rents:
The Henry Johnson Charter School saw the rent for its 31,000-square-foot building skyrocket from $170,000 in 2008 to $560,000 in 2009.
The Albany Community School‘s went from from $195,000 to $350,000.
Green Tech High Charter School rent rose from $443,000 to $487,000.

(link...)

Education reform is a good cause, innovation is good. But the push coming from Wall St and financiers assures the poor & middle class will lose more while our taxes enrich the 1%ers. This form of financing corrupts short & long- term efforts for improving schools in all of our communities.

Rachel's picture

Emerald is smack dab in the

Emerald is smack dab in the middle of the federal empowerment zone, meaning banks make big bucks on construction & can double their money in 7 years with a 39% New Market Tax Credit.

Didn't that entire program sunset at the end of 2013?

michael kaplan's picture

that's an interesting

that's an interesting question. could this program have been a "done deal" before the end of 2013, with the school board's approval simply having been a rubber stamp on a process already in place?

KH's picture

Done Deal

You have stumbled on the way this system works with a Broad Academy superintendent. I suspect most things, including Parthenon recommendations, are probably a done deal before the public ever hears about them. Board members pull a pay check for showing up to 3 meetings a month and voting yes. McIntyre's contract extension was absolutely a done deal before they stacked a board room with good ole boys to speak on his behalf and push teachers out into the atrium. Discussions and forums are just a media play and a smoke screen for decisions that have already been made.

Mike Knapp's picture

NMTC expired

You may recall a few months ago some of us were having a discussion about the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) and its relation to charter school financing. According to our look-see in January we confirmed that the NMTC had sunset. Here is some recent info from Enterprise which specializes in affordable housing. There is a NMTC coalition attempting to revive it.

Emily Cadik
Senior Policy Analyst, Project Manager
Last Updated: June 18, 2014
Current Policy State
The NMTC has expired. Congress passed a two-year extension of the NMTC as part of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which authorized $3.5 billion in NMTC allocation authority for 2012 and 2013, but congressional action is needed to extend the program beyond 2013. Senators John Rockefeller (D-WV) and Roy Blunt (R-MO) introduced the New Markets Tax Credit Extension Act of 2013 (S. 1133) on June 11, 2013 to permanently extend and strengthen the NMTC. Companion legislation (H.R. 4365) was introduced in the House by Representatives Jim Gerlach (R-PA-6th) and Richard Neal (D-MA-1st) in May 2014.

The Senate Finance Committee approved a two-year extension of the NMTC in the Expiring Provisions Improvement Reform and Efficiency (EXPIRE) Act in May 2014, but the full Senate has yet to vote on it.

fischbobber's picture

Good Info

This is the same model Haslam was trying to use with the Ten Year Plan. Investors cash out on the front side and taxpayers are stuck with the long term debt of a piss-poor plan.

michael kaplan's picture

text book

textbook

fischbobber's picture

Actually, it's a dead-on analogy

In the case of Teaberry, you had federal funds coming in to buy a distressed piece of property and a developer that may or may not have used due diligence in order to get cash flowing for the project. In fact, had I not gone down to view the site before the neighborhood meeting, the fact that the lot was a sinkhole may well have been hidden until after cash had started flowing and the project was a financial disaster. Had those with anything more than a cursory interest in pretending to be more intelligent and progressive than anyone giving a hard look at the realities of the project actually gotten up off their dead ass and done the basic homework I did, they too would have seen the obvious.

Likewise with the Emerald project. There has been an exodus from A.E. to Fulton leaving underutilized real estate that is quickly becoming distressed due to poor management. The parties involved all keep coming back to being the same people whose past and present agendas just happen to all work toward the goal of public funds being channeled into private hands.

In both cases, noble goals have been used to drive an agenda that is anything but noble. Neither project is about helping a situation, both projects primary purpose was to channel public monies into private hands where there was no accountability.

And Toby, I asked you to come down and view the Teaberry site on more that one occasion. Just because you chose to keep your head in the sand doesn't mean the rest of us should be expected to keep ours up our ass just to make you look smart. You were wrong about Teaberry and too lazy to do your homework on the subject. Deal with it.

It's the same model, drawn up by the same team.

fischbobber's picture

Changing the subject

You continue to choose to ignore reality. The theory of the Ten Year Plan and the choice of the Teaberry site are two different things.

Likewise, the theory of charter schools and the implementation of the Emerald Schools project are two different things.

Frankly, I'm not being paid to report on this subject. And responding to people that are ignorant on the goings on is above and beyond, but, the reality is this; the reason this school district was chosen is because it has already been established by the public sector that this school zone is ripe for change. Austin East High School has been gutted by the exit of students for Fulton. People are acting surprised because parents want the best for their children. Why should poor people want any less for their children than rich people? Sure, if folks had money and connections they would put their children in private schools (I would, if that was a realistic option) but the reality is, most people rely on public education.

What is happening at Emerald is that a foundation of false hope is being built. Likewise with the Teaberry project.

Just because a noble cause is put on the table as motivation, does not mean that the noble cause cited is nothing more than a smokescreen. Furthermore, just because one can convince a carpetbagger with no real investment in the community that a noble cause is noble, does not make it so. That is where this debate lies.

While I appreciate your opinion and Mr. Cohen's, I would submit that both serve private agendas (be they personal or broader) rather than the good of the community at large.

The business model that is being used for the Emerald Schools Project and the business model for the Ten Year Plan are, in essence, the same. They are both designed to siphon public funds to the private sector at the start of the project, and leave the taxpayer to pay the bill when they inevitably fail. Neither plan was designed to work.

Defend your position without example all you want, you will be wrong. You are wrong and your ego is your problem.

jcgrim's picture

NMTC & Empowerment Zones are intact

Rachael, Both programs are still in operation.
The treasury just funded $3.5 billion in New Market Tax credits for 2014. The Empowerment Zones IRS employment tax credit ended last year. However it was re-purposed into public-private partnership grants funded thru HUD.

Mike Knapp's picture

Interesting

Can you provide a link for that? Trust you're right however it somewhat contradicts what was indicated by Enterprise, would like the source if you've got it. I we surprised to see that they allowed it to sunset. We need to build on this.

jcgrim's picture

Mike, the links here

Here's the NMTC:
(link...)

The Empowerment Zones technically expired in 2013. However, those same incentives are available through a public-private partnership called Promise Zone
(link...)
the link on HUD takes you to what appears to be a private contractor who is managing the grants. (Just what we need more outsourced, unaccountable contractors doing the people's work...)

(link...)

michael kaplan's picture

Salaries etc

Betty, do you have any information about Diggs' and Rysewyk's salaries and other financial perks they may receive?

Dahlia's picture

Let me get this straight...

We are being told over and over that the public schools are failing us, so Knoxville brings in a shiny, new charter school and who do they hire to run it? Someone who's been in public schools for most of his career. Do I have that right?

That's some real innovation for ya!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives