Wed
May 27 2009
06:26 pm

Here's a News Sentinel story on the matter.

(link...)

--Mark Harmon

InterModal's picture

In my opinion, he's in the same boat as Ragsdale

He can't really resign, he really doesn't have anywhere to go. In my opinion, he's got some credibility concerns, questionable characteristics and a potentially compromised capability to carry out these duties, such that he's not going to resign, he'll hunker down and slug it out just like Ragsdale did, waiting for the storm to pass and for the public to move on to something else, watch another scandal unfold, make it to football season and the Vols and Lane Kiffen will be the headlines.

In my opinion, when our public officials take no action and implicitly or tacitly approve such improper conduct as demonstrated by Ragsdale, Lockett, those behind the Chad Faulkner fiasco, the situation in the Trustees office, the P-card, community grant dealings and on and on, they create an environment of unaccountability, such that time and time again people attempt rank shennanigans without fear of reprisal or punishment, only fessing up and asking for forgiveness and grace only when caught.

The problems and very layered and in my opinion a compromised daily newspaper, a disinterested district attorney, and an entrenched beaurocracy in local government allow this culture of ongoing attempts to circumvent officials necessary duties to the public continue, all to the detriment of the government's essential functions, creating additional costs to the local taxpayers and continually eroding the community's standards for honesty, integrity, and fair dealing.

We used to laugh at the communities out in the sticks up in Newport, Sneedville, Bulls Gap, and Del Rio, our local government and our local media should really sit in judgment on our disfunctional local government and look hard at why our elected officials have such a hard time explaining what is right and what is wrong.

Sandra Clark's picture

Revenge of the Turtle

Saw Tommy Schumpert at Litton's tonight. Tommy served four years as Trustee and eight as County Executive w/o a hint of scandal. Now he's volunteering his time to fund-raise for parks.

Dammit. Politicians should demonstrate ethical behavior and be leaders. I'm pretty sorry that I called Tommy a "turtle" all those years ... even though he IS slow. - s.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

KNS editorializing, too

KNS has already taken the editorial position that Lockett should resign, too.

(link...)

Rachel's picture

KNS now reporting Lockett's

KNS now reporting Lockett's embezzlement covered a "period of years" through 2008. That means when he was running for office.

Geez.

EconGal's picture

wondering why most of CC won't call for Lockett to resign

Does anyone else wonder why Pinkston, Strickland, Leuthold, Brown and Broyles, et al haven't called for Lockett to resign?

(1) Either they conclude there is nothing wrong with stealing from your employer, or that even if it IS wrong, it's OK to be law director after getting caught at such a "minor offense."

(2) Or they are afraid of what skeletons reside in their own closets that might be awakened if they begin calling for people to resign based on ethical concerns.

I am afraid that number 1 is the explanation for most, if not all of them.

B Harmon's picture

Easy answer to this

Easy answer to this question:

Does anyone else wonder why Pinkston, Strickland, Leuthold, Brown and Broyles, et al haven't called for Lockett to resign?

My guess is that the reporter was unable to reach them for comment. They went the story and with the response from the commissioners they were able to reach before deadline. Or the reporter could have added this cumbersome sentence, " Pinkston, Strickland, Leuthold, Brown and Broyles were not available for comment". But since they are not germane to the story, it was irrelevant.

I am sure as this story unfolds there will be comments from all commissioner and I really doubt any of them will side with Lockett on this.

Tess's picture

Let's hope you are right

Because the Mayor has already stated that he has full confidence in Lockett. I am with Finbarr. This is cut and dried and there is little room for conflict about what Lockett "should" do--which is resign.

EconGal's picture

I wrote: "Does anyone else

I wrote:
"Does anyone else wonder why Pinkston, Strickland, Leuthold, Brown and Broyles, et al haven't called for Lockett to resign?"

Mrs. Commissioner "Twit" (intended in good humor and respect) Harmon replied:
"My guess is that the reporter was unable to reach them for comment."

Au contraire, Mrs. Harmon. I mentioned only those names (Pinkston, Strickland, Leuthold, Brown and Broyles) because they specifically DID make a comment on Tuesday - and each of them said something to the effect that there was no reason for Lockett to resign.

"Commissioners say Lockett's actions between him, former law firm"
(link...)

"Measured response on Lockett"

(link...)

I agree with you; eventually none of the Commissioners will support Lockett - but only after removing their fingers from testing the direction of the political wind.

It will not be because of a sense of right and wrong.

downtownbella's picture

County Commission's reaction (or lack thereof)

Well, I at least applaud the commissioners who have the chutzpah to go on record stating that he should resign. Although I hope I read the KNS article incorrectly-I though it quoted Mark Harmon as stating if it happened more than once he should resign. However, I am sure it is only a matter of time before the rest of them start chiming in if it behooves them to do so.

rikki's picture

Don't forget (3) The

Don't forget (3) The information about this is brand new and incomplete, the offense was unrelated to his county job, and they may simply find it more tactful, as did the ethics panel, to wait for the full story and for Lockett's response before passing judgment.

We don't know how much money was involved nor whether the sick child excuse has any validity. The comment upon which the inference that he was taking money all the way through 2008 is based could simply be referencing his period of employment with his former firm, not the duration of the theft. On the other hand, if the client from which he was taking direct payments was the pension board, things could get more nefarious.

Let's assume for the sake of argument that this was a brief lapse in judgment caused by real financial stresses. To me that is less offensive than Chad Faulkner using his elected office to help his employer keep his department's budget immune from oversight, stomping all over Knox County's home-rule status in the process. And what's the tally of current county office holders who have abused public monies? With abuses of public trust so common, this private matter just doesn't boil my blood like it does for some of you.

EconGal's picture

(No subject)

<<...this private matter just doesn't boil my blood like it does for some of you...>>

I am as bothered by people stealing/misusing public money as anyone. It infuriates me.

But a man who will steal from his partners will steal from ANYONE. This is a predictor of future behavior. It is a window into his soul.

R. Neal's picture

KNS: Knox County Law

KNS: Knox County Law Director Lockett used funds transfer to get car

Holt said Lockett could have requested the Impala directly through the purchasing department but instead, "Mr. Lockett did an internal transfer of funds from (the Law Department's) budget to the Sheriff Office's budget."

rikki's picture

So much for "brief lapse in

So much for "brief lapse in judgment caused by real financial stresses."

KC's picture

"A brief lapse" is a line

"A brief lapse" is a line I've never believed in. It usually refers to what turns out to be a pattern of deceit.

"The sick child" line, when used as the first excuse, always seems repugnant. I know a lot of sick people and parents with sick children who make a lot less than a lawyer, and they're not breaking laws to pay for things.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

His family?

"The sick child" line, when used as the first excuse, always seems repugnant. I know a lot of sick people and parents with sick children who make a lot less than a lawyer, and they're not breaking laws to pay for things."

And on this subject of children, I couldn't help noticing that when KNS did get a quote or two from Lockett, he failed to apologize publicly to his wife and child for the embarrassment he has caused them.

Maybe it's because I'm a woman, but my first thought, if I were in Lockett's shoes, would be for the hurt and shame I had caused the people I love most...

I think Lockett's first remarks, though, were something along the lines that he'd be continuing to do what he does.

He just seems completely without contrition.

knoxvegas99's picture

Pure speculation here, but

Pure speculation here, but I'd lay odds that his financial problems are such that resigning now means bankruptcy. So, he hunkers down until the Board of Professional Responsibility strips his license, hoping to have enough time to dig his way out. I sense another NYT piece coming on about us good old boys in Knoxvegas.

Larry Van Guilder

Rachel's picture

I heard that very

I heard that very speculation today from another person who shares good political instincts with Larry.

talidapali's picture

I understand that his child was sick...

But, there had to have been a better way to raise money to cover his debts than stealing from his employer. He should have gone to his employer and told them what troubles he was having, they maybe could have arranged a short-term loan for him, especially if he was a valued member of their firm. Or he could have explored getting a medical need loan from a bank. There are ways to finance medical needs. The idea that he HAD to steal is ridiculous, but if his former employer doesn't wish to file charges against him that is their right I guess. But that does NOT mean that the citizens of Knox County should overlook this behavior, it is symptomatic of a larger issue with ethics and accountability.

The man should resign now. I know that seems harsh, but there are consequences that must be paid; if you or I had done this we would have to face those consequences...the fact that he is well-known, or -liked, or is a public figure does not excuse his behavior one whit. The law must apply equally to us all or it applies to NONE of us. Do we really want to live in that kind of anarchy?

_________________________________________________
"You can't fix stupid..." ~ Ron White"
"I never said I wasn't a brat..." ~ Talidapali

Rachel's picture

New developments.

New developments:

(link...)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives