I was pleased to see Hayes Hickman's article on Minvilla on the front page of the KNS this morning: (link...)
"Housing First" was to be the key strategy of the TYP but the astronomical price of Minvilla is more representative of "Housing Last". The unanswered question is:
"Why are the much more economical and readily available options which would help more people quicker not being pursued prior to Minvilla?"
Why in the world do we want to help fewer people and take longer to do so? This project has become financially irresponsible and morally reprehensible.
- Air bag recall expanded to millions more cars (2 replies)
- The 16 Best Places to Live in the U.S.: 2015 (9 replies)
- City launching neighborhood traffic safety program, seeks public input (1 reply)
- Trump, Sanders win Indiana (11 replies)
- Trump's celebrity endorsers (3 replies)
- New York Times on Zaevion Dobson murder (3 replies)
- Cruz drops out (3 replies)
- Notice something? (1 reply)
- 2016 Shootings in Knox County, TN (31 replies)
- Latest chapter of the Pilot saga (11 replies)
- Peak Republican indeed (4 replies)
- Haslam allows guns on college campuses (7 replies)