Is this the most interesting election year in recent history?

Submitted by MDB on Mon, 2008/11/03 - 10:30am.

The Washington Post's David Broder thinks so, and he's been covering elections since before a lot of us were even alive, much less following politics.

My thoughts -- this election include

  1. Real fights for both parties' nominations, especially the Democrats
  2. The defeat of the "certain" candidate for the Democratic nomination, and a transition from front-runner to practically out of it to nominee for the Republicans
  3. Fun candidates like Dennis Kucinich and Tom Tancredo
  4. The weakened influence of the Christian right (they've still got a voice -- witness the Palin selection -- but they did not want McCain)

About the only thing missing is that general election doesn't look to be close. Other than that, its been a great year+ for political junkies.


  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
11
vote
Paralleling Tancredo with
Submitted by metulj on Mon, 2008/11/03 - 10:48am.

Paralleling Tancredo with Kucinich is why Broder is an irrelevancy.

True happiness is knowing you are a hypocrite. -- Ivor Cutler

MDB's picture
Not Broder
Submitted by MDB on Mon, 2008/11/03 - 10:55am.

That was me, not Broder -- he doesn't mention either Kucinich or Tancredo.

OK. Just watch that with
Submitted by metulj on Mon, 2008/11/03 - 11:23am.

OK. Just watch that with Kucinich. It's buying (or looks like) into a real horseshit GOP talking point.

True happiness is knowing you are a hypocrite. -- Ivor Cutler

MDB's picture
Hey, I like Kucinich -- I
Submitted by MDB on Mon, 2008/11/03 - 11:28am.

Hey, I like Kucinich -- I voted for him in 2004, though Kerry had clinched the nomination by then.

I was just inspired by NPR's 'Wait Wait Don't Tell Me' naming Kucinich and Tancredo as their "Hopeless Candidates of the Year" for 2008.

It's been something
Submitted by bill young on Mon, 2008/11/03 - 1:01pm.

I never thought I'd see a campaign more enthralling than 1968.

The Democrats in '68:

McCarthy's shocking 42% of the vote in the New Hampshire primary.LBJ getting out of the race.RFK's frantic primary campaign.The violence outside the hall the emotion inside the hall @ the convention.

The Republicans in '68:

Romney's front running campaign implodes.
Rocky's on again,off again,on again campaign.Reagan goes for it @ the convention.Agnew.

The '68 Fall campaign:

Wallace's openly segrationist campaign peaking @ 21% in the polls mid Sept.HHH comes on strong late but it's not enough.
Nixon rises from the ashes to win.

However as folks have already posted 2008 has had it all.

The fall campaign has been hard fought & like HHH in '68 McCain is closing.

Will we see the McCain pull the biggest upset since Truman-Dewey in '48 or the first black candidate elected president?

Either way this election has been something else & surpasses 1968 as the most interesting election I have ever seen.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.
Home » Blogs » MDB's blog