Mon
Jun 16 2008
10:21 am

The City of Knoxville and the MPC are holding a public meeting on July 8 re. Downtown North/I-275 Redevelopment. Topics to be discussed include mixed-use form-based zoning and a "road diet" for North Central. Details in the press release after the jump...


From the City of Knoxville:

The City of Knoxville along with the Metropolitan Planning Commission and Knoxville’s Community Development Corporation will host a public meeting Tuesday, July 8, on planned improvements for the Downtown North/I-275 Redevelopment area.

The meeting is set for 5:30 p.m. in the Knox County Health Department Auditorium at 140 Dameron Avenue.

Of particular interest will be plans for revitalizing the North Central Street which are scheduled to begin later this summer.

“What we want to do is present some ideas aimed at revitalizing and changing the North Central Street area to make it more attractive to residents and to businesses there,” said Bob Whetsel, the city’s director of redevelopment, “and we want to get some feedback from people who live and work there about our plans.”

The Central Avenue corridor is part of the city’s Downtown North/I-275 Redevelopment Area where the city is seeking to expand the successes it has seen in downtown Knoxville to the north.

“This is an area that a lot of people have expressed an interest in living or operating businesses in and the city, in terms of infrastructure and other areas, wants to help this area thrive,” Whetsel said.

Among the topics of the meeting will be an overview of the Downtown North area and various programs available to help with the redevelopment effort.

Those include the city’s Facade Improvement Programs; a description of the Downtown North /I-275 Redevelopment and Urban Renewal plan; zoning ordinances and enforcement; plans for the I-275 Business Park Road and a proposed Downtown North Streetscape Program.

The Downtown North area is roughly defined by Depot Street on the south, I-275 to the west, Woodland Avenue to the north and Hall of Fame Drive on the east.

North Central Street and Broadway are the main thoroughfares.

The first step is work along North Central.

The goal is to make North Central more of a mixed-use zone with offices and some residential and retail elements facing the street. The plan would also seek to make the street more pedestrian friendly.

To achieve that the city, MPC and KCDC are looking at rezoning to change the current commercial zoning along the corridor to a mixed use commercial and residential zoning using a form based code.

There is also a road diet plan that would reduce North Central Street to two through lanes with turn lanes at signalized intersections from Broadway to Woodland.

Narrowing the street would allow for increased public parking and also create a street with slower traffic that would be friendlier to pedestrians and bicycle riders.

Sidewalk improvements are also part of the proposed North Central package.

Bill Lyons's picture

Different approch to development

Thanks for posting this, Randy. This is very helpful in getting the word out. This project is critical to, and emblematic of, our approach to the core of the city. Basically we are talking about a paradigm shift in land use and development philosophy that makes to one that is less auto-centric to one that is much more pedestrian friendly. This is not an easy transition to make, but it is basically an extension of what is working downtown into commercial corridors in the neighborhoods around downtown. We will use the same sort of form based zoning approach that was used for the South Knoxville waterfront and will soon be underway for Cumberland Avenue where Anne Wallace (working with Bob) is the point person.

You will see the results soonest in Downtown North, where much is already happening. We have coordinated the work of Community Development with the facade improvement program with that of MPC (and KCDC)in these efforts, which basically lessen parking suburban on-site parking and set-back requirements that presently get in the way of revitalization in the core. With more on-street parking, fewer lanes, wider sidewalks, buildings and businesses that front on the street can work, and can become mixed-use work-live structures that people in nearby neighrborhoods can reach by walking.

This effort in the Downtown North area is led in our dept. by Bob Whetsel, who, along with his wife Melinda, was one of the early pioneers / leaders in the revitalization of 4th and Gill. Folks in 4th and Gill, Old North, Mechanicsville, and Park Ridge and other areas have already done a lot of the investing and heavy lifting to provide a set of strong neighborhoods that support a revitalized set of commercial corridors.

A lot is already happening in the area, but there area lot of real challenges in front of us. A lot of this was citizen-driven, beginning with the Broadway-5th Task Force. I hope folks in the area and beyond will take the time to participate and support this effort, which is the among the best and most efficient (and doable within constrained budgets!) policy responses I can imagine to the energy and environmental challenges we face.

bizgrrl's picture

paradigm shift :(

paradigm shift :(

sugarfatpie's picture

"Basically we are talking

"Basically we are talking about a paradigm shift in land use and development philosophy that makes to one that is less auto-centric to one that is much more pedestrian friendly."

This is great! So long in coming.
One suggestion: How about actual bike-lanes? Sometimes it can be a bit scary riding in on Central.
Thanks for all you're doing!
S

"X-Rays are a hoax."-Lord Kelvin

jbr's picture

North America's most bike-friendly cities

MSNBC has a current article on the most bike friendly cities and some characteristics of such....

(link...)

Looks like the bike industry is booming

edens's picture

Just curious, do you object

Just curious, do you object to the phrasing or the "paradigm shift" itself?

Bill Lyons's picture

"paradigm shift"

I'd coin a new phrase to describe what I think is going on with this, but I thought "paradigm shift" worked as a concept the first time I heard it, and still works. "Paradigm" has a meaning that is not obtuse and "shift" is, well, pretty widely used. The phrase was meant to communicate a non-incremental change representing a different underlying approach based on different values and assumptions.

But I am open to other uses of language if the phrasing offends. Instead of "Basically we are talking about a paradigm shift in land use and development philosophy.." we could substitute something better. Maybe..."This is a commpletely different way of doing things." Maybe its just me but I kinda like using a little different language now and then, when appropriate and when a concept fits the facts on the ground.

edens's picture

"Extreme Makeover: Homeless

"Extreme Makeover: Homeless Edition"

rocketsquirrel's picture

a paradigm shift usually

a paradigm shift usually refers to what we are shifting away from, and toward.

Are we shifting away from the Broadway/Fifth task force approach?

The Ashe administration?

where exactly are the two paradigms?

Bill Lyons's picture

A change by any other name still.....

Rocket Squirrel:

a paradigm shift usually refers to what we are shifting away from, and toward. Are we shifting away from the Broadway/Fifth task force approach? The Ashe administration? where exactly are the two paradigms?

I thought my original language explained the what the shift was about.

Basically we are talking about a paradigm shift in land use and development philosophy that makes to one that is less auto-centric to one that is much more pedestrian friendly...... which basically lessen parking suburban on-site parking and set-back requirements that presently get in the way of revitalization in the core. With more on-street parking, fewer lanes, wider sidewalks, buildings and businesses that front on the street can work, and can become mixed-use work-live structures that people in nearby neighrborhoods can reach by walking.

Apparently my communication skills have deteriorated rapidly upon hitting the big six-zero a couple of weeks ago. Forget paradigms and forget shifts. Let's start again here since my original comment is locked from editing. In response to the posting on Knoxviews of the City of Knoxville's press release in re: Central Avenue: "Thank you. This is an important meeting. Some stuff having to do with traffic, parking, walking, and development is happening."

bizgrrl's picture

What metulj said.

What metulj said.

S Carpenter's picture

DNA - Downtown North Association

Efforts to form an inclusive association of residents, merchants, and property owners in the Downtown North area are underway. Draft provisions of bylaws for organization of the association are to be considered at the next meeting on June 30.

Location of the meeting will be finalized soon. Please contact me for more info. All who have an interest are welcome and invited.

rsc@w3st.com

Up Goose Creek's picture

Changes

I like that the city is looking at ways to change the codes and building forms but I have a couple of questions.

You have the Central plan, the Magnolia plan, Waterfront plan and Cumberland Ave plan. Bearden plan?? That's an awful lot of new development for a little city. Are we suffering from irrational exuberence?

What's with the elimination of ANY required parking (see waterfront plan)? Seems a bit naive in our car centric society. I figured it was just an excuse for a publicly funded parking garage at the time. Does Bill Haslam have insider info from Pilot Oil about $10/gallon gas?

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

Bill Lyons's picture

Development capacity

Well, interesting questions. Thanks. Basically we do have a Waterfront Plan. By nature of the Waterfront area and the need for a lot of new infrastructure that would have to be separated from the others.

Cumberland Avenue is characterized as a project rather than a plan. It will involve some major work on an existing state right of way - Cumberland, other improvements and redesigns, and a major change in the rules governing property development. As of now the City has not designated it as a redevelopment area with the powers and incentives that can provide. Cumberland, with proximity to UT, medical centers, and, of course downtown, is a natural for much more dense, quality, mixed use, development. This has been validated by our initial study.

Downtown North is also a project. It has a much more modest and less expensive redesign contemplated for Central, and some other infrastructure improvements. Because of the extensive blight in the area and the necessity of incentives for mixed- use projects like that at 912 N. Central, it has been designated as a redevelopment area.
Here, as in Cumberland (and previously in South Waterfront) the land-use regulations are key. In all of these the goal is pedestrian friendly/ mixed use. Downtown North redevelopment area also contains industrial corridors toward the western end that could benefit from improved accessibility and possibly re-use. There is no "plan" for the overall development of the area. It will develop according to trends and market forces and the economy. Properties will change hands and develop in the context of the new rules. A lot of the progress there will be done one structure at a time, as in Happy Hollow and at the Ironwood studio and with area around St. John's Lutheran. The city is using facade money and sidewalk money through Comm. Dvlp, some improvements through the street paving program and sidewalk repair programs, and working with individuals, businesses, neighborhoods, and churches to encourage walkable areas. There are obvious issues regarding homeless-related issues that are being addressed in the same context.

Keep in mind that all of this has been made possible by investments that individuals in the neighborhoods have made, including 4th and Gill, Old North, Mechanicsville, Park Ridge, and, a bit further out, Oakwood-Lincoln Park, etc. Now the corridors can help provide missing pieces to connect the neighborhoods to downtown.

Likewise there is no "plan" for Magnolia at present, but the beginnings of the same processes that are at work in Downtown North. A lot of city resources are going toward improved housing in the area, especially around Five Points. As things move forward the next step is to envision and set the stage for Magnolia to change its character. We are not sure exactly what that will be. That process is at a very early stage.

None of this is like "Sim City," if that is even around any more. As you point out, we have limited budgets, personnel, and time, to take all of this on at one. The City's legal toolbox is likewise pretty constrained. The approach we are using involves not using a heavy hand, but changing the underlying set of incentives and disincentives and letting folks locate, improve, leave, invest in line with the area's evolving nature. A lot depends on the decisions of individual property owners, many of whom have very little basis in their properties, and have their own agendas for use, future development or lack thereof, etc.

I think we have the capacity to make these changes. It is essential that we be clear about what we are doing and have extensive involvement and discussion as we move along. Recent experience has shown the sound process with public involvement is not an impediment to accomplishment, but a help, as long as people can see that there is a result connected with the process. I think it would be short-sighted and irresponsible not to address the future of the core of the city.

South Waterfront has be far the greatest direct public investment because so much new infrastructure has to be built. Cumberland is a distant second. The others are much more organic. All involve city resources, attention, and investment, but the total is manageable.

Bpittman's picture

Bill Lyons, I, for one,

Bill Lyons,
I, for one, greatly appreciate the city's focus on this area as I believe it is key to sustainable city center. While it is just outside the scope of the various initiatives geographically, the scuttlebutt about St. Mary's is very concerning. Even more concentration of services for the homeless, mentally-ill and addicted between Woodland and Broadway is unbelievable to me and I hope that they City will take an active role to ensure that this does not occur.

I would further suggest that the city become actively involved in the future TDOT project involving the connection of Hall of Fame Drive to Broadway. Leaving its interstate-esque design as opposed to a simple, urban T-intersection would be yet another lost opportunity. Unlike the ill-conceived rebuilding of 40 through downtown, it is not too late to redo this intersection which could possibly reconnect Luttrell St. (at least with a pedestrian bridge) and reconnect 1 or 2 other streets to Broadway making the community more pedestrian and bicyclist friendly.
Thanks,
Bill

Up Goose Creek's picture

Plan for Magnolia

I don't want to quibble about semantics, but as landscape architect I think of a plan first as a drawing. I was thinking of the drawing MPC presented at a LWV meeting that I would define as a "conceptual master plan". It showed road changes and blocks of potential new developments. Similar to what I've seen for the north central corridor, and the large scale waterfront plans for that matter.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

Bill Lyons's picture

Death by a thousand definitions

This use of "plan" represents a semantic paradigm shift from mine.

bill young's picture

bang up job

I think the Haslem gang is really
doing a bang up job on center city
projects or plans or whatever one
wants to call it.

The center city developed more or less
like this:

1.downtown..incorporated in 1794..

2.Magnolia annexed in 1868(ok I know the
eastern part of Magnolia was caught up
in the 10th ward flap of 1893)

3.North Central & Cumberland in 1897

4.Park City,Lonsdale & Oakwood in 1917.

When I read Bill's post it seamed to me
the Haslem folks are working on plans/
projects in the oldest sections of the city.

I know Bill Lyons talks about the vibrancy of
a central city adds to the culture.

However,I would make the arguement that
these areas of our city have a vine ripened
infra stucture.

When we develope the central city

We dont have to cut down any trees..
flood downstream..build new roads or
widen 2 lane country roads.

The traffic lights are in place..same with
sewer/water/power & cable.

There are schools & parks & sidewalks.

Oh yea..the bus serves the central city well.

Just keep plugging along,folks.

Finally,I want to say this.

Am I a supporter of Mayor Haslem

Hell yes.

Do I think everything he's trying to do
will work out.

Hell no.

But by god this guy tries every day
to see if he can make Knoxville better.

I am one voter that wants to say

Right On..Brother Haslem..Right On

Bill Lyons's picture

Thanks for putting it so well

I would make the argument that these areas of our city have a vine ripened infrastructure. When we develop the central city...We don't have to cut down any trees..flood downstream..build new roads or widen 2 lane country roads. The traffic lights are in place.. same with sewer /water/ power & cable. There are schools & parks & sidewalks. Oh yeah..the bus serves the central city well.

Thanks Bill, for capturing and effectively expressing the logic and intent underlying this effort. As you, say, all of this will not necessarily work out as anticipated, especially on the timetable all of us would like. Too many unknowns, unmeasured variables, other players, and unforeseen events. Also there is a limited (financial and legal) toolbox to deal with some pressing issues. That just means it is not easy.

We have a jewel in the core of the city. It has been roughed up a bit over the years. It is not for everyone and never will be. It is, however, making a lot more sense for a lot more people and will make sense for even more folks as time goes by. Government's job is to remove impediments, encourage, be very strategic with investments and incentives, and, I know this sounds strange, but some will know what I am referring to, just to pay attention!

rocketsquirrel's picture

Yes, I think Bill Young

Yes, I think Bill Young makes a good case for capitalizing on the existing infrastructure of our urban core, especially in the Magnolia/Park City area, with its strong street grid pattern, housing stock, and strong businesses along Magnolia. A shame that once again the emphasis seems to be on a minor capillary (Five Points) instead of the major artery (Magnolia.) That just doesn't make sense.

I don't think the Mayor, again, included anything in this year's budget for the Magnolia Corridor.

A shame, and quite a missed opportunity that into the second Haslam term, there still is not a plan for Magnolia, as Bill (Lyons) seemed to indicate below. Unlike the south waterfront, Park City doesn't need heavy public infrastructure improvements.

Carole Borges's picture

I've seen these Magnolia Corridor plans

There are some plans for the Magnolia Avenue corridor. You can see them here:
(link...)

It's too bad if there weren't any city funds designated for this area. Hope was raised when the community saw these pictures and plans.

Bill Lyons's picture

Clarification

Just to clarify, the link is to a presentation made to a public meeting conducted by MPC and the AIA to present some of their preliminary thoughts and receive public opinion in regard to the Magnolia corridor. This is first step in a long process. I think the PPT makes that pretty clear. Certainly no expectations of impending construction funding have created. There is nothing designed. We are not yet near that stage.

You will note in the ppt. that one of the sections mentioned is the "downtown section" that is included in the Downtown North development strategies. There is some funding this year to devlop a streetscape program and to bridge Downtown to Emory Place across Magnolia. All of these core city projects radiate from the Downtown out, to build on the success of downtown.

rocketsquirrel's picture

like I said, the City has

like I said, the City has still not developed a plan for the Magnolia Corridor.

That PPT was done for AIA's anniversary project. It was not initiated by the City, and doesn't commit the city to any facade improvements, business recruitment, business retention, or business expansion opportunities. The former Levis plant off of Cherry Street is now a parole office. Meanwhile, you've got 100 year old businesses out there, like Lays, M Licht and Sons...RT Clapp is at least 75. Pizza Palace is at least 45 years old.

This community needs thoughtful planning, urban design, and help making the business community and the neighborhoods stronger.

Carole Borges's picture

Oops! I thought that was a plan.

Thanks for clarifying the actual difference between these two processes, Bill.

Bill Lyons's picture

MPC does work under city contract

Thanks for clarifying the actual difference between these two processes, Bill

You are welcome Carole, although, as so many things, things are not quite as clearcut as they might seem to someone not close to the sausage factory. MPC did their work to kick off the Magnolia Corridor study on behalf of the City as part of their contract with the City. The City pays MPC each year to perform tasks under their work plan. City officials, including me, were at the meeting and are working closely with MPC, just as we are on Cumberland and Downtown North and as we did with the South Waterfront. But, as Rocket Squirrel pointed out, the AIA participated as well. All of these project have in common a vision of changing the playing field for development. But each is unique. The conditions have to be right for investment or people will not invest. The city has to be strategic in applying its limited capital dollars; timing, and fitting the strategy to the environment at the right time is the challenge. Because of the strength of, and proximity to, downtown and the stability and strength of the surrounding neighborhoods, and, most especially, the fact that people are starting to take risks and improve some properties, we are beginning to change some of the streetscapes and move ahead on the form based code to make it easier for folks to invest in the projects that work for a walkable, mixed use community.

I hope everybody who has in interest will come to the July 8th meeting where all the entities will be there to discuss this in more detail. Thanks for your patience.

rocketsquirrel's picture

couple of quick points: 1.

couple of quick points:

1. Phil is completely inaccurate in his assessment of this thread. Yes, some thread drift. But this is not about Bill Lyons and criticism. Phil, get a grip. This is about wise (or unwise) city investments, and putting the cart before the horse. Fr'instance, the city blew some money on Five Points Village without realizing the real investment first needed to be on the major artery, Magnolia, rather than a peripheral area, Five Points. Pizza Palace doesn't need anyone's help. The point, Phil, is that we cannot afford to lose any other good businesses such as these, and we need the City to step in to make sure that a) existing businesses get support for basic services that are taken for granted in other parts of the city, including police protection, b) new businesses are recruited (see Haslam's efforts to get Mast General to Gay Street), and c) support is there from the Chamber and the City to expand existing businesses.

2. Go read the Park City book, which I co-authored in 2005 with Becky French Brewer. Pay special attention to the introduction and the epilogue. It is a call to arms, and the AIA cited it heavily in its little Powerpoint that is now sitting on yet another shelf.

3. Go talk to the folks at Barnes Barber Shop in Burlington. They have seen more of these dog and pony shows which have turned out to be no more than broken promises since Leonard Rogers was mayor. We now have yet another mayor who is now in his second term who has yet to make any investment in Park City.

The only investment that has been made is Five Points Village, which has now been bought by a church and is being run by Rene Kesler. We've now invested millions of dollars for yet another nonprofit, which should have been a revenue producing commercial center. Imagine the difference if those same dollars had been spent wisely on fixing the aesthetic problems associated with the main Magnolia corridor. Light up the streets, fix the sidewalks, identify and secure historic assets, which still have not been inventoried in this sector of the city. Park City Presbyterian Church on Olive is a prime example. So are a number of other historic buildings, including 4 pre-civil war houses in this area, many historic cemeteries, including 1850s Jewish cemetery on Linden, as well as historic factories and warehouses, historic Chilhowee Park, site of THREE national expositions 70-plus years before Knoxville hosted its World's Fair.

Buy the book if you want to understand why Park City is deserving of more focus and attention than it has received from this or any previous mayor. You can get it on Amazon or at Barnes and Noble.

Carole Borges's picture

I can attest to it being a beautiful book

One thing's for sure. It's impossible to read it without realizing "Park City" is more than just a name. Its importance extends beyond its geography. Those who once lived there, those who do live there, and those who will live there in the future, all have an enviable and special sense of place. Even without the city's help a few people are slowly reclaiming Park City on their own. As someone who has seen neighborhoods change all my life, I feel that someday that neighborhood will be one of the most desirable in the area. Just read the book and you'll see why. Unfortunately gentrification often brings its own set of problems. That's why careful planning is so important.

Up Goose Creek's picture

Poetic

Very poetic, Bill Y, as usual.

I like your imagery: vine ripened vs. hothouse grown.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

Center City Phil's picture

This is funny and no wonder

This is funny and no wonder government people stay off of the blogs. Lyons tries to explain what they are doing. He takes time to go into a lot of detail. So he gets criticized for his word choice. Then someone brings up the question of how the city can do all of the stuff in the center city at once. Lyons explains that they are not doing it all at once and that some are further along than others. He explains the difference in the plans, and that only the waterfront has a lot of new stuff that you would plan for. Another quarrel with a word choice. Then it gets funny. He is criticised for not doing anything on Magnolia and then explains that it is early for Magnolia and the city is putting its money into housing. He doesnt say it but everyone knows what happened with Five points when the stores came in too early without the neighborhoods being ready. Then somemone links to a powerpoint and says there is a plan there but when you go to the powerpoint it was to get ideas from a meeting. Then the city is criticized for not having a Magnolia plan but somehow they are supposed to place businesses or get busiesses to build there. The best is that Pizza Palace is 45 years old. So the City obviously is supposed to got rehab Pizza Palace.

The great thing is that the City of Knoxville is doing what looks like great things on Central and nobody except Bill Youg could say a thing about it but they are doing too much and not enough and have a plan and don't have a plan and the director of development uses words they dont like. Kudos to Bill Young for figuring it out and being able to be say something nice. Like I said that is pretty funny.

Up Goose Creek's picture

My Burlington rant

Plans or no plans I think what will help Magnolia the most are 2 things. One will take a lot of money and effort and city county cooperation. The other will take a staff meeting and may already be done.

First Austin East needs to be turned around. Whatever it takes. Make it a first rate high school. They've made the teachers all reapply, why not make the students reapply as well. Get some funding from the city. Ask MPC to do a study on how much property tax the city would collect if all those vacant lots in Burlington had homes on them.

Second: I hope I NEVER again call police dispatch about a suspicious character on Fifth avenue and get this snarky response: "well what do you want me to do about it?". Yes Ma'am, I know the guy has rights and I'm glad we live in a country where he has rights. I don't expect you to snatch him up and ship him to Guantanamo but can't you at least send a cruiser by to give him the evil eye? Maybe a plainclothes cop if you have one available. I know he's selling drugs, you know he's selling drugs, and I wish you would be grateful I'm giving you a tip rather than treat me as an annoyance.

Yes Phil, I know this has nothing to do with Central. It's called thread drift and it happens. Unlil last night I did not realize that the Magnolia drawings had nothing to do with the city.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

Stan G's picture

There is also a road diet

There is also a road diet plan that would reduce North Central Street to two through lanes with turn lanes at signalized intersections from Broadway to Woodland.

Is the city planning to cameraize the intersections when they signalize them?

Bill Lyons's picture

Caramelized intersections

Is the city planning to cameraize the intersections when they signalize them?

Caramelized intersections are not on the road diet and don't work well in hot weather. Maybe near Mag-pies.

Up Goose Creek's picture

Caramel

Better watch it, Dr. Lyons, Phil will zing you for making a joke.

I hope he starts a blog for city cheerleaders only. It's so annoying when people disagree in public!

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

jbr's picture

How to Build a Better Intersection

From an article on pedestrian friendly road designs in Wired magazine.....

(link...)

However no red light camera revenue.

Up Goose Creek's picture

intersections

Oh yeah, I encountered a few of those stopsign free intersections in Seattle and coulda had a wreck at one. They'll need to figure out a way to ban tourists from these areas. If I hadn't read about this (sorry bizz) paradigm shift somewhere I would have assumed a downed sign and barreled through the other intersections as well.

To me a stop sign at least means slow down and see if someone's coming because they have the right of way.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

Nelle's picture

Knoxville driving explained

So you object to street design that makes people slow down and pay attention to what's going on around them because you don't want to slow down and pay attention to what's going on around you?

Well, I guess you get points for honesty, at least.

Stan G's picture

Knowing Up Goose Creek, I'm

Knowing Up Goose Creek, I'm of the opinion that she is just about the last person I know who would NOT slow up to respect the rights of others, stop sign or no stop sign.

Since ninety-nine plus percent of the current intersections are not designed to slow traffic down to a reasonable speed, the stop sign, as Up Goose Creek points out, is an indicator that one had better slow down because traffic approaching on the cross road is not about to slow down.

For years drivers exceeded the speed limit on Wesley Road in West Hills. The city final made several of the intersections four-way stops -- the additional stops being the price through drivers had to pay for ignoring the posted speed limit. And what did many of the locals do, they took advantage of the stopped traffic to turn onto Wesley Road without coming to a complete stop.

In this town, few drivers, state law or not, respect pedestrians in or about to step in a marked crosswalk. Those that do often have out-of-state license plates.

It's not likely that we're ever see many traffic slowing intersections in Knoxville.

Up Goose Creek's picture

Pedestrians

Believe it or not, I do stop for pedestrians as a general rule. I am trying to do this more consistently. Partly from traveling in europe and partly out of respect that they are polluting the environment less than I.

The rolling stop comes from not wanting to waste energy accelerating from a dead stop.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

Michael's picture

I'll bet it's been difficult

I'll bet it's been difficult to adjust to rising energy prices by learning to roll through stop signs. If only more people were as conscientious maybe we wouldn't be in this mess.
~m.

Up Goose Creek's picture

Sacrifices

Yeah, it's a tough life, Michael.

Do I get extra points for rolling through a stop sign on my electric bicycle?

To get back on subject, I would like to see a good bike route from South Knox to Happy Hollow. I thought I read/heard about an "alternate route" under consideration to north central via Mechanicsville. Now that I think of it, I may be able to scout one myself via 2nd creek and Blackstock and crossing over the RR tracks.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

scottfrith's picture

I don't live in this

I don't live in this neighborhood, but do business there. I'm going to attend this meeting.

Anonymous's picture

Downtown Development

In looking at downtown revitalization in other cities, the primary object for downtown revitalization seems pretty simple- entice people to want to be downtown and to bring their wallets with them. One jumpstarter to that is to entice the employers, so that if people work downtown, they will eat there, buy there, and maybe want to be entertained there. And, a downtown actually has something of an advantage as convenient central location for museums, stadiums, theatres, and other cultural attractions to the surrounding area.

So, you focus on commercial recruitment, and the relevant governmental and cultural entities locate the primary public and cultural draws downtown. What follows is a greater demand that provides an opportunity for further supply, i.e., more businesses can succeed downtown or nearby because more people have been drawn there, and more people will live there.

Most U.S. cities followed that pattern for 150 years, then with the advent of faster transportation and an accomodating highway system, came the burbs. Businesses realized that going to where the people are meant locating near the subdivision. Downtowns were emptied. Some cities have reversed this trend, some haven't. Knoxville hasn't, and based upon where we are currently, it won't in the near term.

While we all talk about downtown revitalization, the larger corporations located here have built new headquarters in the burbs (Goody's, Pilot Oil)- or moved to contiguous counties (Clayton, Hackney). One of our critical cultural components, our professional baseball team, was moved to another county. Our governmental entities attempted to find a main attraction, Universe Knoxville, etc., but failed to reach a concensus. No similar effort has even been intitiated or promoted in the private sector.

Ironically, during this period, 2 of our mayors had considerable influence in this regard. The Testerman family was instrumental in residential development in West Knoxville. The Haslam family of course controls Pilot Oil and the once-named Knoxville Smokies. This isn't a political commentary, both Mayors have remarkable achievements to speak of, but only a commentary on the movement away from downtown.

Imagine the boost to downtown if Clayton Homes, Pilot Oil, Goody's, and other local companies had located there. Imagine the boost if a landmark cultural venue were built, and other cultural venues remained. Municipal plans for downtown would not just be well-intentioned wishes for increasing use and demand, but instead would be infrastructural necessities to accomodate increasing use and demand.

Knoxville's business and political leadership, which understandably overlap, have not "voted with their feet" by locating and/or recruiting downtown. For the private sector, that's their prerogative. Although it would have been nice to see a concentrated effort to revitalize downtown, obviously the will to do it in the local private sector is not there. Instead, I think that what we are seeing is an effort to appease those who want a revitalization by creating plans that will make things look a little nicer, but don't really address true revitalization, and won't bring many more people to the area.

If past behavior is an indication of the future, successful and substantive downtown revitalization in Knoxville will not occur until a new generation of business and political leadership, with a commitment to investing their own interests downtown, takes the reins.

This isn't a political message or even a criticism, but only one person's view as to where we're going based on where we've been.

Don't believe me? Take a look at the downtown landscape, and remove just 3 buildings- the Whittle Building, Riverview Tower, and First Tennessee Plaza, and imagine what our downtown would like like without them. Those buildings are there because just 3 business leaders, Whittle, Jake Butcher, and C.H. Butcher, like them or not, committed to downtown. Similar commitment is not now seen, nor is recruitment, and any plans without that commitment and recruitment are really somewhat insignificant.

Stan G's picture

Excellent comments, as we

Excellent comments, as we have read, major professional firms are moving west in part for the reasons you cite.

Carole Borges's picture

What kind of downtown is best?

It seems to me some communities decide they want to be the place where people work, while others decide to be the place where the people who own or manage the places where other people work live. Is this true?

I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to city designs, but do downtowns have to have large corporations there? It seems to me that easy, accessible, and affordable transportation is huge when it comes to economic success of all kinds. Especially now that gas has gone through the roof. A return to localized neighborhoods where you can walk to work or find anything you want to buy would be a blessing. Chicago and Boston have a lot of these. Can large corporate businesses maybe dis-assemble themselves and put smaller stores everywhere, ala Starbucks and others? Corporations could be located in commercial office parks outside the downtown area. People would still come into the city if the businesses there were attractive enough, unique enough, and easy to get to by public transportation. Vacant strip malls are usually chosen as sites for office parks after they have gone fallow. It seems inevitable that residential units downtown are always followed by retail shops and restaurants.

The other day I was in Market Square commenting about how great it was that so many people were filling the restaurants, sitting outside at tables, and bringing their dogs and kids down to feel part of something urban. Her comment was, "I liked it better before all these stores and people came."

My question is do the people (not the planners or artists who render designs)really know what they want the downtown to be like?

I'm fond of Knoxville's downtown really. I love the architecture and the slow growth pleases me. Free parking after 6 makes me use downtown the most though. I love the free parking idea.

Stan G's picture

My question is do the

My question is do the people (not the planners or artists who render designs)really know what they want the downtown to be like?

Good questions. I definitely have my opinions, but no time to discuss them now.

I suggest you start here: (link...) and (link...) to get an idea of what others have said they want downtown to be like.

bill young's picture

That was then..this is now & maybe, then again

1.My Dad grew up on Highland..
around '50/'51 his parents bought a
house in Holston Hills.

When my Grandfather passed in '56
my Aunt Dot & Uncle Joe's family
moved into the Holston Hills home
with my Grandmother.

2.My mother's family bought a house
in West Hills around '58/'59.

3.Jim Coffin(who also grew up on Highland
& is a dear friend of my Dad's)in the
late '50's moved Coffin Shoe Store
from Downtown to Bearden Center &
bought a house in West Hills.

So when I was a kid I spent time
in Holston Hills & West Hills.

The first thing that changed in the migration
from the central city to Holston Hills & West Hills
was grocery shopping.

Other than a delivery from the corner
market every day.

Moms,on Saturday,drove to the
White Stores in the nearest strip mall
& bought groceries for the week.

Then,as with Coffin Shoes,the
smaller local retail shops began to
migrate from down town to these
strip malls.

Before you knew it..movie theaters &
all kinds of stuff began popping up
on Magnolia & Kingston Pk.

Never forget when the first McDonalds
opened on Magnolia.

We were evolving into a car society.

No longer did you walk or take streetcar
downtown..to see a movie or shop.

Nor did the high school kid bring todays
groceries to the back door.

We got in our car & drove to the strip mall.
Bought food,shoes,clothes ect.

We also stopped going to the Tn Theater
& started going to the new theaters
on Kingston Pk & Magnolia.

The department stores had not made the move
out of Downtown & they began to feel the
economic pinch of less traffic.

Department stores do not buy space they
rent space.

They do this because when
traffic patterns change they pull
up stakes & follow the traffic.

Downtown started devoloping in 1794.

In 1970 it was still the only place that
provided the infrastructure for a department
store.

Then BANG..in two short years..WEST TOWNE MALL
was built & the department stores left downtown.

Today a vast majority of Knox Countians
must get in a car & drive to do anything.

My goodness,West Towne is right next
to West Hills but I double dog dare
you to walk from West Hills to West Towne.

It just aint safe.

Plus,you cant walk from Holston
Hills to the Krogers.

It's just too far away.

My question is?

Are the aging boomers,their kids &
grandkids thinking about spending
more time in the neighborhood & less
in a car?

I'm not talking about yearning for
a past that is gone.

But a 21st century neighborhood with
light rail..combined with the internet
& right now covenience..in the central city.

Then again

In with the new paradigm

Same as old paradigm

Stan G's picture

My goodness,West Towne is

My goodness,West Towne is right next
to West Hills but I double dog dare
you to walk from West Hills to West Towne.

It just aint safe.

Noticed when I had to make one of my infrequent trips to Westown the other day that after 30 years the intersection of Kingston Pike and Morrell Road now has marked crosswalks and walk signals. Still no sidewalks, but other than tourists staying at the motel there isn't much reason for pedestrians to cross at that intersection.

Bill Lyons's picture

Reminder - meeting is tonight

The meeting on the Downtown North Redevelopment plan is this evening at 5:30 at the Knox County Health Department auditorium, 140 Dameron Ave. Thanks to Hayes and the NS for a good summary of many of the key issues. (link...)

From NS article..[Gotta love that first comment!]

The success of Knoxville officials' new focus on revitalizing the Broadway and North Central Avenue corridors could hinge simply on a comfortable pair of shoes.

Whether it's the new redevelopment plan that calls for a pedestrian-friendly streetscape or efforts to draft a form-based zoning code that would allow for a wide mix of commercial and residential uses without traditional, suburban parking requirements, walkability is being designed as a key component to the area's renewal.

I hope as many people as possible can attend. This whole effort began with concerns expressed by many over the situation at Fifth and Broadway and in the core of the city between Downtown and neighborhoods to the west, north, and east. For those who want some background and context, all of the history of this, including meeting notes, and recommendations of the task force assembled, can be found at (link...)

To reiterate, this is about a "whole new approach" to development and the rules governing such, with the goal being walkability and mixed uses. Thanks for the opportunity to discuss, and I hope to see some of you there this evening.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives