There are currently 3 users and 212 guests online.
Additional Lasik eye surgery warnings sought
Submitted by bizgrrl on Sat, 2008/04/26 - 7:00am.
In fury and despair, patients harmed by Lasik eye surgery told federal health advisers Friday of severe eye pain, blurred vision and even a son's suicide. The advisers recommended that the government warn more clearly about the risks of the hugely popular operations.
...
And while the vast majority benefit — most see 20-20 or even better — about one in four people who seeks Lasik is not a good candidate. A small fraction, perhaps 1 percent or fewer, suffer serious, life-changing side effects: worse vision, severe dry eye, glare, inability to drive at night.
Eye surgery so I don't have to wear glasses sends chills up my spine, but then I'm not one to have ever worn contact lenses either.
Be careful out there. Don't be sold. Do your homework.
Submitted by Dean Andrew Kantis (not verified) on Mon, 2008/04/28 - 12:16am.
FDA PANEL DISCUSSION POINTS- April 25th, 2008
By Dean Andrew Kantis, #2 Guest Speaker
Good morning FDA Panel, Honored Guests, and Fellow Victims of the Flawed & Unpredictable LASIK Eye Surgical Procedure. My name is Dean Andrew Kantis, founder of LifeAfterLasik.com. For the past 9 years, I have spent $30,000 seeking restoration of my ruined vision only to find out there is NO CURE. Through my website, hundreds of victims have contacted me expressing their suicidal thoughts. Some have already committed suicide. It’s always the same story. I WAS LIED TO…The name says it all…LA...SICK!
When I began to speak out against LASIK years ago, I encountered a severe backlash. My own doctor, Nick Caro of Saint George in Chicago, tried to sue me for $2 million dollars for exposing his 40+ LAWSUITS. He then caused my family to get a divorce last year by harassing my wife attempting to get her fired from her nursing profession. My family has been harassed, has had death threats, and was lied to by this doctor, yet no one has punished him for his actions… Where was the FDA?
How is it that a doctor in this country can have 40+ lawsuits with NO KNOWN DISCIPLINARY ACTION? I feel that my “second opinion” doctors also lied to me, and I know they are the problem. How is a patient ever able to find out they have a problem if all of the “follow up” doctors lie to protect the original doctor?
After submitting complaints on these same doctors to the Department of Regulation, backed by solid evidence, I soon found all were DENIED. They all went up to “Probable Cause,” and there at the top sits a Medical Doctor in order to “cover a fellow doctor.” I feel like I have been RAPED…Where is the FDA?
Because of the Lies, I was unable to sue my doctor before the Statute of Limitations ran out. I guess that is why they all kept telling me that it would take 3, 4 maybe 5 years to fully heal. Sound familiar? I had to go online to find out the truth. I am now out of pocket for all medical costs, lost wages and for daily suffering.
I don’t know of any other procedure where hundreds of patients have created websites, warning the public about the unpredictability and corruption of LASIK surgery. I have outlined (5) KEY Emergency Points which should be thoroughly answered by this Panel, to ensure that the LASIK industry does not continue to DUPE the misinformed public:
Number One: What is the truth about the FLAP and Pupil Size? I was told that the flap created heals like a cut on your hand. But the truth is the flap NEVER heals, is unpredictable, and leaves the patient with a permanently scarred cornea. My pupils were measured off the charts at 9mm, yet my doctor told me “I was the perfect patient candidate for LASIK.” Just remember: Today’s happy 20/20 LASIK patient may regress and be tomorrow’s LASIK casualty driving a school bus picking up YOUR children. Oh yes, it effects every single one of you here today…
Number Two: What is “True Informed Consent”? I have submitted a complete pamphlet to this panel that gives the patient “True Informed Consent” with full color pictures illustrating the known side effects. Please consider mandating this pamphlet for yours is antiquated. Then educate the consumer on the Statute of Limitations so they know the “timeframe to sue their doctor” starts from the date of the procedure NOT the date of discovery. The Lying LASIK Doctors all know this…
Number Three: What constitutes a LASIK “Success?” I see double vision, halos, starbursts, fluctuating vision, and dry eye syndrome…Yet, I was told that I was a “Success.” Can you believe that? In order to believe the LASIK Industry’s reported satisfaction rate of 95%, you must accept these complications to be “acceptable normal outcomes.” That's the question... Do you believe a patient who has these problems to be a “Success” because the LASIK industry does! Shouldn’t “Patient Success” be decided by each individual patient however THEY define “Success?” How does this Panel define Success?
Number Four: What is a “Breach of the Standard of Care” for LASIK Doctors? The FDA has stated over and over that it is NOT their job to discipline doctors. Then who’s job is it because nobody seems to be doing it? I am out of a life that I once enjoyed because MONEY came first and my Well Being came last! I ask this Panel to hold the FDA responsible for reviewing the Ambulatory Code: 21 CFR 803.17 requiring all LASIK facilities since 1997 to report ALL adverse patient outcomes. I feel every LASIK facility in this country is in violation of this mandatory requirement, which should prompt a Class Action Lawsuit. If the CDRH has not even bothered to check the LASIK Centers in their own neighborhood, why did they all of a sudden set up “Sight Net” as a new initiative for their own incompetence? I do hope the media here today will investigate this.
Lastly, Number Five: What are the unforeseen Emotional Consequences of LASIK that Effects Every LASIK Doctor, Their Family Members, and Patients? I come today, at my own expense, to inform this Panel that you have a serious problem on your hands of very desperate, suicidal and angered patients that know their LASIK doctors lied to them and blame their doctors for ruining their precious lives. I ask this panel to set up an Emergency Hurt LASIK Patient Fund, in order to help patients with suicidal preventative therapy, ongoing medical expenses, legal representation, and lost wages. Please take immediate action to protect the end consumer who is paying you to protect them.
Submitted by CathyMcCaughan on Mon, 2008/04/28 - 12:34am.
A long, long time ago, I had Lasik done. I was one of the initial test subjects in Atlanta. I had no complications and a few hours after the surgery, I was able to see without glasses for the first time since I was about 4-years-old. Because of the severity of my vision problems, I had to go in for a second procedure. This one was much quicker since my eyes already had "flaps." Yes, I know that's gross. I thought it was cool. I don't regret having Lasik.
Submitted by Andy Axel on Mon, 2008/04/28 - 9:28am.
I've been seeing a lot of places springing up that advertise inexpensive Lasik surgery.
I think the last place I'd want to go is some dropshot operation advertising the lowest prices for lacerating my corneas with a modified diamond-cutting tool.
(And while I'm not the most faithful guy in the world, stories like Mr. Kantis' certainly hearkens me to mulling over some passage about "an eye for an eye...")
____________________________
"It's gettin' so a businessman can't expect no return from a fixed fight. Now, if you can't trust a fix, what can you trust?"
Submitted by Pam Strickland on Mon, 2008/04/28 - 10:26am.
Two years ago, I did a feature on eye health for Health magazine that included information about the latest vision surgeries. There are several keys to this, one is using someone who has done the surgery many times. The other is careful preparation and screening. Don't go for the guys who give a cheap price. It's not for everyone -- I am not a candidate because I have some auto-immune issues -- but some people are good candidates. And I know at least two other people who, like Cathy, have been helped tremendously because they were able to go from very strong prescriptions to weaker prescriptions that corrected their vision closer to 20/20.
Pam Strickland
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." ~Kurt Vonnegut
FDA PANEL DISCUSSION POINTS- April 25th, 2008
By Dean Andrew Kantis, #2 Guest Speaker
Good morning FDA Panel, Honored Guests, and Fellow Victims of the Flawed & Unpredictable LASIK Eye Surgical Procedure. My name is Dean Andrew Kantis, founder of LifeAfterLasik.com. For the past 9 years, I have spent $30,000 seeking restoration of my ruined vision only to find out there is NO CURE. Through my website, hundreds of victims have contacted me expressing their suicidal thoughts. Some have already committed suicide. It’s always the same story. I WAS LIED TO…The name says it all…LA...SICK!
When I began to speak out against LASIK years ago, I encountered a severe backlash. My own doctor, Nick Caro of Saint George in Chicago, tried to sue me for $2 million dollars for exposing his 40+ LAWSUITS. He then caused my family to get a divorce last year by harassing my wife attempting to get her fired from her nursing profession. My family has been harassed, has had death threats, and was lied to by this doctor, yet no one has punished him for his actions… Where was the FDA?
How is it that a doctor in this country can have 40+ lawsuits with NO KNOWN DISCIPLINARY ACTION? I feel that my “second opinion” doctors also lied to me, and I know they are the problem. How is a patient ever able to find out they have a problem if all of the “follow up” doctors lie to protect the original doctor?
After submitting complaints on these same doctors to the Department of Regulation, backed by solid evidence, I soon found all were DENIED. They all went up to “Probable Cause,” and there at the top sits a Medical Doctor in order to “cover a fellow doctor.” I feel like I have been RAPED…Where is the FDA?
Because of the Lies, I was unable to sue my doctor before the Statute of Limitations ran out. I guess that is why they all kept telling me that it would take 3, 4 maybe 5 years to fully heal. Sound familiar? I had to go online to find out the truth. I am now out of pocket for all medical costs, lost wages and for daily suffering.
I don’t know of any other procedure where hundreds of patients have created websites, warning the public about the unpredictability and corruption of LASIK surgery. I have outlined (5) KEY Emergency Points which should be thoroughly answered by this Panel, to ensure that the LASIK industry does not continue to DUPE the misinformed public:
Number One: What is the truth about the FLAP and Pupil Size? I was told that the flap created heals like a cut on your hand. But the truth is the flap NEVER heals, is unpredictable, and leaves the patient with a permanently scarred cornea. My pupils were measured off the charts at 9mm, yet my doctor told me “I was the perfect patient candidate for LASIK.” Just remember: Today’s happy 20/20 LASIK patient may regress and be tomorrow’s LASIK casualty driving a school bus picking up YOUR children. Oh yes, it effects every single one of you here today…
Number Two: What is “True Informed Consent”? I have submitted a complete pamphlet to this panel that gives the patient “True Informed Consent” with full color pictures illustrating the known side effects. Please consider mandating this pamphlet for yours is antiquated. Then educate the consumer on the Statute of Limitations so they know the “timeframe to sue their doctor” starts from the date of the procedure NOT the date of discovery. The Lying LASIK Doctors all know this…
Number Three: What constitutes a LASIK “Success?” I see double vision, halos, starbursts, fluctuating vision, and dry eye syndrome…Yet, I was told that I was a “Success.” Can you believe that? In order to believe the LASIK Industry’s reported satisfaction rate of 95%, you must accept these complications to be “acceptable normal outcomes.” That's the question... Do you believe a patient who has these problems to be a “Success” because the LASIK industry does! Shouldn’t “Patient Success” be decided by each individual patient however THEY define “Success?” How does this Panel define Success?
Number Four: What is a “Breach of the Standard of Care” for LASIK Doctors? The FDA has stated over and over that it is NOT their job to discipline doctors. Then who’s job is it because nobody seems to be doing it? I am out of a life that I once enjoyed because MONEY came first and my Well Being came last! I ask this Panel to hold the FDA responsible for reviewing the Ambulatory Code: 21 CFR 803.17 requiring all LASIK facilities since 1997 to report ALL adverse patient outcomes. I feel every LASIK facility in this country is in violation of this mandatory requirement, which should prompt a Class Action Lawsuit. If the CDRH has not even bothered to check the LASIK Centers in their own neighborhood, why did they all of a sudden set up “Sight Net” as a new initiative for their own incompetence? I do hope the media here today will investigate this.
Lastly, Number Five: What are the unforeseen Emotional Consequences of LASIK that Effects Every LASIK Doctor, Their Family Members, and Patients? I come today, at my own expense, to inform this Panel that you have a serious problem on your hands of very desperate, suicidal and angered patients that know their LASIK doctors lied to them and blame their doctors for ruining their precious lives. I ask this panel to set up an Emergency Hurt LASIK Patient Fund, in order to help patients with suicidal preventative therapy, ongoing medical expenses, legal representation, and lost wages. Please take immediate action to protect the end consumer who is paying you to protect them.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Dean Andrew Kantis
Founder
Link...
A long, long time ago, I had Lasik done. I was one of the initial test subjects in Atlanta. I had no complications and a few hours after the surgery, I was able to see without glasses for the first time since I was about 4-years-old. Because of the severity of my vision problems, I had to go in for a second procedure. This one was much quicker since my eyes already had "flaps." Yes, I know that's gross. I thought it was cool. I don't regret having Lasik.
I've been seeing a lot of places springing up that advertise inexpensive Lasik surgery.
I think the last place I'd want to go is some dropshot operation advertising the lowest prices for lacerating my corneas with a modified diamond-cutting tool.
(And while I'm not the most faithful guy in the world, stories like Mr. Kantis' certainly hearkens me to mulling over some passage about "an eye for an eye...")
____________________________
"It's gettin' so a businessman can't expect no return from a fixed fight. Now, if you can't trust a fix, what can you trust?"
Two years ago, I did a feature on eye health for Health magazine that included information about the latest vision surgeries. There are several keys to this, one is using someone who has done the surgery many times. The other is careful preparation and screening. Don't go for the guys who give a cheap price. It's not for everyone -- I am not a candidate because I have some auto-immune issues -- but some people are good candidates. And I know at least two other people who, like Cathy, have been helped tremendously because they were able to go from very strong prescriptions to weaker prescriptions that corrected their vision closer to 20/20.
Pam Strickland
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." ~Kurt Vonnegut
Post new comment