Obama's Bubble | KnoxViews

Tue

Feb 19 2008

09:57 am

By: bizgrrl

Are you ready? Is he ready?

Michelle Obama says, "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country, because it feels like hope is making a comeback."

Florida campaigning, or not.

Via Instapundit

Topics:

bizgrrl's blog
Login or register to post comments

I refuse

Submitted by gonzone on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 10:23am.

I absolutely refuse to click on any link to the Instacracker. I will not give him ANY traffic to his web pages. Now Randy will have to scrub down Knoxviews because of the offensive links just to get the smell out.
Yuck!
Next thing you know there'll be links to Drudge.

Why would I ever want advice from such an idiot?

Is backlash starting? Not if Glenn the Lesser thinks so would be a good stance.

"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
Hunter S. Thompson

I believe the point (I don't

Submitted by R. Neal on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 10:26am.

I believe the point (I don't know, the Mrs. is out walking the dog and I will have to ask when she gets back) is the coordinated, high profile attack that is already starting...

OK

Submitted by gonzone on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 10:37am.

OK, I see now.
That was not clear to me but oppo research is legitimate linking.
I'm getting so used to the senseless Obama vs. Hillary fighting that I missed that possibility.

"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
Hunter S. Thompson

That's what I assumed the

Submitted by Rachel on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 1:01pm.

That's what I assumed the point was, altho I gotta say that Michelle Obama statement was a mistake. Really? The FIRST time she's been proud of her country?

However, in the superheated, superfast pace of this campaign, it'll be forgotten by next week.

Gotcha politics brought on

Submitted by Bbeanster on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 1:51pm.

Gotcha politics brought on by her husband's unexpected success.

People trip over their tongues all the time. Even experienced people.

It's like when I hear Pat Summitt (habitually) say "The one thing I like about (XX) is that she..."(rebounds consistently. looks for her shot. never lets down on her intensity. etc)

If I took her literally, I would assume that she's saying that, say, Shannon Bobbitt has no other redeeming qualities beyond her 3-point shooting ability and is pretty much a waste except for that, since this is only thing Pat likes about her.

Of course that's not the case.

Same with Ms. Obama, IMO.

And besides, whose chest swells with pride at our current foreign policy? The treatment of immigrants? The fact that lobbyists still run our government? The state of healthcare?

Michelle Obama is OK by me -- so far. If I find out that she's on the BOD of WalMart I could change my mind.

I didn't say I had a problem

Submitted by Rachel on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 4:12pm.

I didn't say I had a problem with Michelle Obama. I said that what she said was a mistake, if one with pretty low consequences. But I bet she'd rephrase it if she had the chance to do it over.

What she said is "For the

Submitted by Sarge on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 2:17pm.

What she said is "For the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country", at her age, maybe forty something, I can understand what she means because her adult years consisted of 8 years of Reagan, 4 years of daddy Bush, 8 years of Clinton and 8 years of the current Bush, thats 28 so so years.

Instapundit = all linky, no

Submitted by Justin on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 10:32am.

Instapundit = all linky, no thinky. His "blog" is a mixture of Google news alerts with one sentence diatribes.

Don't Think Hillary's Ready Either

Submitted by Ragsdale2010 (not verified) on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 11:23am.

She'd be jaded by the same old rhetoric that captured the first Clinton term starting in January, 1993, they never really understood the campaign was over and governing is very, very different that campaigning.

She's great at throwing bombs at opponents however, how do you respond when people start bombing the county? Blame it on somebody? That's not governing or leading, that's more campaiging, constantly trying to shape pubic opinion through dialogue rather than forging public opinion by taking action.

Well, heck, that's the way

Submitted by bizgrrl on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 11:32am.

Well, heck, that's the way to stand up to the Conservative rhetoric.

Yes I am

Submitted by bill young on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 11:32am.

In every heated campaign there are stumbles.
Obama's no exception.

Indeed,the Obama bubble could bust.

It could bust in Wisconsin..or with losses in both Texas & Ohio.

A loss in Wis would turn this race upside down.

It would allow Clinton to survive with a split in Tx,Ohio
& become the frontrunner with a sweep.

Plus,if she gets hot could win Haw,RI & Ver.

But if Obama wins Wis & in either Tx or Ohio.
The bubble gets bigger..the wave larger..

If you want to win turn out matters.
Nominate Obama & Democrats will vote in record numbers.
We will win seates in the House & Senate.

Nobody ever knows for sure but I believe Obama could be a truely great president.

This is not a rational choice because we do not make political choices rationally.We making them in our gut.Thats why the debate is so heated & personal.

My gut is Obama all the way!!

Am I ready for whats comming?

Yes I am

Blame it on somebody? That's

Submitted by Factchecker on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 2:03pm.

Blame it on somebody? That's not governing or leading, that's more campaiging, constantly trying to shape pubic opinion through dialogue rather than forging public opinion by taking action.

Sounds like push piece against Hillary, and not fair to history.

My gut is Obama all the way!!

Am I ready for whats comming?

I'm about ready to agree with that. Still think Hillary could be the better president, but the general election will be a political blood bath against her that she might not survive.

OTOH, Obama's got nearly the same platform but wrapped in a package that's more electable. He's the GOP's worst nightmare--just ask Rush. And he could be as good or better in office as Hillary. He might not live up to the hype, but I'm not sure we should risk a Clinton campaign (as apart from a Hillary presidency).

An NPR piece this morning discussed how it's always a crap shoot as to how a president actually performs once they're elected. There's little to go on and many presidents throughout history have not led as expected, for good and bad.

Bill Maher said it right. The Dems need to realize what they have in Obama.

Really

Submitted by Stick Thrower on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 3:04pm.

Actually, she said, "...really proud..."

The wingnuts left off a word to help generate extra phony outrage for the "Love It or Leave It" crowd.

If nit picking and misquoting Michelle Obama's impromptu speaking is all the Instapundits and Drudges can come up with, I like Barack's chances.

Actually, she said,

Submitted by R. Neal on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 4:09pm.

Actually, she said, "...really proud..."

Actually, she didn't. I just saw a replay on MSNBC and she said it exactly as quoted above.

(Unless MSNBC did a masterful, undetectable edit job.)

Not that it's any big deal. I get what she was trying to say in the context of her remarks, although it can easily be spun in other ways.

But this is what it's going to be like in the fall. Every phrase, every word, every tone, every cadence, every pause, every gesture, every facial expression, every twitch, parsed inside out.

Hell, we may even finally find out what the meaning of "is" is.

Really.

Submitted by Stick Thrower on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 7:38pm.

Watch it for yourself on cspan. 11:14 into the speech. She CLEARLY says "really proud..."

It's not a big deal, except the breitbart video making the rounds on the web and getting everyone all in a tizzy is obviously clipped.

Must be two different

Submitted by R. Neal on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 9:26pm.

Must be two different speeches, or she said the same thing twice in the same speech two different ways. Or MSNBC is putting one over on us.

If

Submitted by bill young on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 5:23pm.

For the Obama & Clinton campaigns its just one huge IF.

If this happens in Wis..or that happens in Tx & Ohio.

If this & that happens where will we be?

Headed to Pa..if this happens...or that.

On to West Va..NC..Oregon..& on & on

Then if that & this & the other thing happens

The Convention turns to home boy.

It's AL!!!

Context is everything...

Submitted by Yellow Dog on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 7:45pm.

I haven't seen anyone cite the full quote yet...

“For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country,” she told a Milwaukee crowd today, “and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change.”

I'm sure that will be clarified on cable news

Submitted by Factchecker on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 7:45pm.

Leave it to the right slanting MSM.

Here's a more manageable

Submitted by Bbeanster on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 7:54pm.

Here's a more manageable clip:

(link...)

And here's an LA Times story that says there was a "blip" in the tape over the word "really", materially changing the meaning of what she said:

(link...)

So, she really said "really." The Clintonistas seem almost as ecstatic as McCain's drugged-out wife over this sideshow.

The Clintonistas seem almost

Submitted by Rachel on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 8:35pm.

The Clintonistas seem almost as ecstatic as McCain's drugged-out wife over this sideshow.

Look, I don't like McCain, and I don't like his wife jumping into this. And yes, she had a drug problem. But I think that was quite a few years ago.

If it's unfair to criticize Michelle Obama over what she said, it's also pretty unattractive to characterize Cindy McCain as a "drugged out wife."

Unless you have evidence that she's still using.

Look, I don't like McCain,

Submitted by Bbeanster on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 10:07pm.

Look, I don't like McCain, and I don't like his wife jumping into this. And yes, she had a drug problem. But I think that was quite a few years ago.
If it's unfair to criticize Michelle Obama over what she said, it's also pretty unattractive to characterize Cindy McCain as a "drugged out wife."
Unless you have evidence that she's still using.

Of course I don't have evidence re Cindy McCain's drug use, and I do not know whether she's still using, or whether she's still stealing from non-profits, either. But she got a helluva free ride on the whole incident, which involved a whole lot more than just simple drug use, and occurred while her husband was a US senator planning to run for president. I was astonished that she had the gall to jump into this kerfluffle, given her past and the fact that her husband is a hawk in the drug "war."

(link...)

If this is the case: Of

Submitted by Pam Strickland on Wed, 2008/02/20 - 1:45am.

If this is the case:

Of course I don't have evidence re Cindy McCain's drug use, and I do not know whether she's still using, or whether she's still stealing from non-profits, either.

Then saying this:

The Clintonistas seem almost as ecstatic as McCain's drugged-out wife over this sideshow.

was reckless disregard for the truth. It seems that you might want to go back and read what you wrote about the bloggers needing to learn about libel and not printing rumors. What's good for the goose....

Pam Strickland

"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." ~Kurt Vonnegut

Public Figures

Submitted by SteveMule on Wed, 2008/02/20 - 2:04am.

Ms. Strickland,
I believe Sullivan vs NYT would apply here.

Take Care, Be Good and don't play in the street!

SteveMule

Here's a more manageable

Submitted by Bbeanster on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 7:54pm.

Here's a more manageable clip:

(link...)

And here's an LA Times story that says there was a "blip" in the tape over the word "really", materially changing the meaning of what she said:

(link...)

So, she really said "really." The Clintonistas seem almost as ecstatic as McCain's drugged-out wife over this sideshow.

What's the subtext?

Submitted by Yellow Dog on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 8:06pm.

So is the subtext of this thread that only Obama will face the nitpicking and parsing of every word, phrase, and past action, and that the vast right-wing conspiracy will leave HRC alone if she's the candidate? I've heard the argument that HRC has already been publicly "vetted" and there's not much left to dig up on her; however, the flip side of that is that the wingnutty, illogical, irrational hatred of HRC is already so deeply-ingrained that the right-wing pundits won't _have_ to say anything. Minds are already made up. That's why, in terms of the"electability" argument, I think BO has the better chance against McCain (and recent polls, for the most part, have supported this). Still, if HRC is the Dem candidate, I will support her, and I certainly won't be jumping on the right-wing parsing bandwagon.
MJR

So is the subtext of this

Submitted by R. Neal on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 9:57pm.

That's not what I'm saying. They will viciously attack whoever the candidate is.

There's no blip on the CSPAN

Submitted by Stick Thrower on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 8:06pm.

There's no blip on the CSPAN video.

Who doctored the video?

Yeah, I'm confused about the

Submitted by Rachel on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 8:34pm.

Yeah, I'm confused about the blip too. The clip I saw seemed pretty clear.

Although I really don't care. I think she made a boo-boo, but I think that's all it is.

There's no blip on the

Submitted by Bbeanster on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 9:45pm.

There's no blip on the CSPAN
Submitted by Stick Thrower on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 7:06pm.

There's no blip on the CSPAN video.
Who doctored the video?

OK, I watched the CSPAN video, and sure enough at 11:12, she says "...I'm really proud of my country..."

Brietbart, Drudge's "news service" is the source of the doctored quote.

Well, yeah...

Submitted by Stick Thrower on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 10:10pm.

Thanks for checking the original source (CSPAN), Bbeanster.

Why are Democrats wetting

Submitted by rikki on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 8:55pm.

Why are Democrats wetting themselves over every little attack? Wouldn't their time be better spent sharpening their claws. They chose not to impeach the Dick because they liked their election prospects better with him hanging around, so use the bastard! Force the Republican nominee and any Republican who wanders into view to answer for Dick's sins. Republicans already hate McCain for not getting all googly-eyed over torture along with their sick, conformist asses, so keep making McCain distance himself from the Dick.

Republicans can't defend themselves. They are cultists who make sense only to each other, and the more they get hammered on the dishonesty they've made themselves party to, the more true believers will slough off the wound. Plus, we need to get as many of them as possible on record in support of signing statements, contempt of Congress and rejection of the authority of the judicial branch, so when a Democrat is President and their comprehension of executive power shifts to the polar opposite of what they believe now, we can quote them directly and ask whether they got a free bowl of soup with their lobotomy.

Why are Democrats wetting

Submitted by Andy Axel on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 10:09pm.

Why are Democrats wetting themselves over every little attack?

Indeed. Who needs the Republicans to do the ratfucking?

We're doing quite well calling each other cultists and sellouts and phonies and sexists and yelling race/race/race and HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!! HEY, RUBE!!!

This is just like putting beta fish in a tank. I just wonder who's setting up the scenario so we can all (predictably) jump on this minutiae and call it substance.

You know what they say - if you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything.

And we gotta whole lotta nuttin' goin' on.

____________________________

With the possible exception of things like box scores, race results, and stock market tabulations, there is no such thing as Objective Journalism. The phrase itself is a pompous contradiction in terms.

I saw a couple of minutes of

Submitted by Johnny Ringo on Tue, 2008/02/19 - 11:41pm.

I saw a couple of minutes of O'Reilly (sp?) tonight (that's about all I can stand) and he was saying that Michelle Obama made that speech twice today or recently. So it's possible that in one speech she said "really" and in the other she didn't. Not that it matters a whole lot, but that's what I heard.

good lord......

Submitted by JustJohnny on Wed, 2008/02/20 - 12:54am.

....linking to insti?

Obama (D) wins nine in a row over Clinton (D)

Clinton is off message and getting messy with attacks. Doesn't look good for the coming two weeks....

If this is the case:

Submitted by Bbeanster on Wed, 2008/02/20 - 2:36am.

If this is the case:
Of course I don't have evidence re Cindy McCain's drug use, and I do not know whether she's still using, or whether she's still stealing from non-profits, either.
Then saying this:
The Clintonistas seem almost as ecstatic as McCain's drugged-out wife over this sideshow.
was reckless disregard for the truth. It seems that you might want to go back and read what you wrote about the bloggers needing to learn about libel and not printing rumors. What's good for the goose....
Pam Strickland

Cindy McCain's drug issues are reported in the link I posted, and others that I didn't post, but which are easily found. The McCains orchestrated a coverup of C. McCain's drug scandal, co-opted their local media, falsely claimed that she was going to rehab, and then "got" the whistleblower who told on her. What I said was harsh, and greatly truncated the whole affair, but it's not a rumor and it's not libel, and it's actually a lot worse than I indicated.
My observation of Clinton supporters' reactions to Michelle Obama's gaffe was based on reading comments on multiple sites last night.
(link...)

Discussing:

Are Chat bots a waste of time? (1 reply)
Smith & Wesson noise problem (1 reply)
Musicians dropping out of President's Freedom Concert Series (1 reply)
It's time for new blood in Congress, Barnett in - Burchett out (1 reply)
Burning Down The House... (2 replies)
Behind Lege Lies (1 reply)
Peace (1 reply)
Speak your truth, fight and believe. (1 reply)
Large banks have too much AI data center debt? (1 reply)
GOP misleading on federal health care funding (1 reply)
Feds indict civil rights group (3 replies)
Georgia issues burn ban, first time in state history (2 replies)

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

State News

Wire Reports

Local Media

Lost Medicaid Funding

To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

Comment viewing options

Discussing:

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

State News

Wire Reports

Local Media

Lost Medicaid Funding

Search and Archives

TN Progressive

Nearby:

Beyond:

At large:

Government

About