Mon
Oct 8 2007
09:16 pm

According to The Daily Times, some local citizens, The Smoky Mountain Convention and Visitors Bureau, and the Southeast regional office of the National Parks Conservation Association are developing a shuttle service for Cades Cove. Tourists appear to be their target riders.

It looks like it will be next summer before anything happens. Great idea, I hope they succeed.

Brian A.'s picture

Good

Link wasn't working for me.

But if they can reduce the number of vehicles in the cove, I presume I'm for it.

Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.

bizgrrl's picture

Oops. Linked fixed now.

Oops. Link fixed now.

trobinson's picture

This is an idea that's been

This is an idea that's been around for a while and I hope it gets adopted. Zion National Park has a shuttle system that reduces the crush of vehicles and provides a much better experience than riding around in your car. People have to actually get out of their car and talk to each other!

Mello's picture

From the article I don't get

From the article I don't get the feeling that it is a shuttle service and not a tour bus.

— the shuttle would have to run daily

Brian A.'s picture

Options

So they've been debating five options for at least 2 years . . . when is anything going to be done?

If nothing else, they should at least widen the road and add pull offs so there's not "wildlife jams" whenever someone spots a deer. That's the worst aspect of the traffic.

I'm curious about the legal constraints on fees. I know the park can't charge an entrance fee due to land transfer restrictions. Does this similarly prevent the park service from charging for access within a specific area (e.g. Cades Cove)? Could they charge a vehicle fee for driving around the loop?

I think that's the only way they're going to get large numbers of people to use public transportation.

Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.

Michael's picture

Personally, I'd like to see

Personally, I'd like to see The Loop closed to motor vehicles. An exception could be small, propane-powered or other emission-free buses that could run every 5 minutes or so and drop and pick up visitors at their leisure. Auto traffic is destroying the Smokies.
~m.

Pam Strickland's picture

autos and smokies

It's a long story, but this summer one of my aunts took a visiting cousin to the Cove. Traffic was brought to a stand still. My cousin, who is Italian on his mother's side, got tired of waiting and took off on foot to see what the delay way. Turns out people were all excited about a bluebird, as if they'd never seen such a thing.

Pam Strickland

"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." ~Kurt Vonnegut

fletch's picture

I see they didn't take my

I see they didn't take my suggestion as one of the proposed alternatives, that being close the road and let the cove go back to forest.

Joe328's picture

Close it from Townsend

I say close the road from the Wye to Cades Cove. Use a free shuttle and if anyone wants to drive to the picnic area, charge a fee. This may not violate the publics free access to the Smokys.

Our park is spelled two ways, "Smokys" and "Smokies," and I was unsure which one to use since both are common use.

Carole Borges's picture

Closing Cade's Cove off would be best...

It's only one section of the large park, and it's much preferable to charging fees. This road simply can't carry the amount of people who want to go there. Realistically, there isn't much chance of relieving the pressure with a few shuttle buses. Then you'd just have lines of shuttle buses instead of lines of cars. Less, but still not a real solution to the problem of congestion and habitat preservation.

It make sense to make people walk in. That way they can go in as far as they like. I'd ban bikes too. Bicyclists can also scare wildlife, flush birds up, and could endanger walkers. Though they don't make that much noise they sure aren't a natural part of the wilderness and teams of speeding bicyclists dressed in weird outfits terrify me, let alone the bears. Make people walk in. Nature can best be appreciated on foot anyway.

Maybe if our national parks eliminated the tourists who don't want to walk into them because of obesity or sheer terror of nature, we would never have to discuss how much to charge. Without them we could eliminate the costly junk food stands, trinket shops and the troops of forest rangers we now need to protect the throngs of people now crashing through our forests.

Senior citizens and the handicapped could be made exceptions.

Then again there are always those overhead trams they have in certain areas of Costa Rica. You ride up, look down, step out, peer at the jungle a minute, then hop back in the tram. Personally I hate these.

Let's make people walk in...

Brian A.'s picture

Bicyclists can also scare

Bicyclists can also scare wildlife, flush birds up, and could endanger walkers.

I'll give you the third one, but cyclists don't scare animals much (if any) more than walkers do.

Perhaps they can extend the no-vehicles off hours at the cove, but it's wishful thinking to talk of them closing motor access completely. That would kill tourism $$.

Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.

Carole Borges's picture

Sorry, I know you're a bicyclist, Brian

But a walker can quietly tread down a country road with great stealth, a bicyclist usually has to keep moving. When walking, I've come upon quite a few wild creatures and gotten very close. I doubt if I'd be able to do that on a bike. Several bicyclist whoosing by at rapid speed have scared the heck out me many times when I walk along city park roads. Certainly, they are way better than cars.

Actually with the inevitable traffic jam a lot of people are avoiding Cade's Cove. I know I won't ever go there again. Closing it might actually bring more tourists, if they didn't have to sit in a line of exhaust fumes for hours with no escape.

Brian A.'s picture

Yes

If you're going out as an individual, and your sole objective is to get close to wildlife, then I'd say you're better off on foot

My point was that a typical handful of cyclists isn't any noisier or more disruptive to nature than a typical group of people walking and talking.

At any rate, either one is far better than the current racket of SUVs and motorcycles that dominate the park. I'd love it if they would close the loop to cars entirely for a couple days a week. But I don't see it happening. Our culture is too dominated by gasoline.

Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.

The VA's picture

I;m not surprised people

I;m not surprised people stopped for a bluebird. When I was in college I took a friend from Philadelphia up to Cades Cove. Not only had she never seen deer that close before, she'd never seen cows so near to hand - and she found those even more amazing

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives