Thu
Sep 13 2007
08:13 pm
By: R. Neal

According to Olbermann, that will be the theme of Bush's address tonight. The more success "we" have in our "investment" in Iraq, the more troops can come home.

So, he's laying it off on the military, and more specifically the troops? If they do their job they get to come home?

What exactly is their job? Isn't that supposed to be defined by civilian political leadership? Who would that be? Oh, wait...

UPDATE: Well, that was interesting. Too much to parse, except for a couple of things.

First, it appears Sen. Lamar Alexander was hand picked to crank up the Republican rhetorical spin about "changing the mission" and "bi-partisan support" in Congress.

Second, Bush admits that his strategy is a continuing presence "beyond his presidency." In other words (as Bush likes to say), hand the problem off to the next president. Hopefully, permanent bases are just a bonus.

Oh, and one more thing. If we are "driven out of Iraq", the same thing that happened on 9/11 could happen again. So nothing will change for one more Friedman Unit until March, when the commanders on the ground will give their next report on what we should do.

UPDATE: John Edwards: "Our troops are stuck between a president without a plan to succeed and a Congress without the courage to bring them home." Edwards says it is time to end the war, and that the next time Bush asks for more money he has a choice: funding with a firm timeline for withdrawal, or no more funding.

Sven's picture

It's the ownership society,

It's the ownership society, baby. Every American owns .0021 dead Iraqi, and the interest is compounding.

The "investment" strategy explained:

In the bigger game of democratic politics, the dollar auction scenario has a particularly dangerous power. Politicians fear that voters will unfairly punish the realist who cuts off the escalation early, in the process also clearly "losing" the ever-diminishing prize. And maybe, just maybe, the appearance of a "win," even at an astounding price, will give some fig-leaf of coverage to the monumental stupidity of getting the United States of America mired in a this kind of situation to begin with.

The administration's goal is keeping the electorate pacified and the game in motion. Emphasize the cost already paid and the further cost of throwing in the towel. Promise that the other side is showing signs of exhaustion — remember Dick Cheney and the few "dead-enders?" Like the man riding the tiger, Bush and company believe they are OK so long as they don't fall off. If the regular dollar auction is irrationality in action, U.S. politics make our Iraq policy irrationality on steroids.

Factchecker's picture

How many $$ would you rate Edwards's hair?

So, he's laying it off on the military, and more specifically the troops? If they do their job they get to come home?

What exactly is their job? Isn't that supposed to be defined by civilian political leadership? Who would that be? Oh, wait...

You mean, like, maybe there could be some diplomatic role? With allies we could assemble--let's call it, say, the "coalition of the willing"--and negotiate some kind of "shared sacrifice" with them, the U.N., and all our friends (left) in the Gulf region?? Sounds kinda crazy!!

Hammersmith's picture

It is as though....

Bush, after having hi-jacked the army to Iraq, now negotiates with the
Americans for its return.

Just think, in no time we will be negotiating with President Hillary Clinton over the same issue--how much do you want to bet?

Factchecker's picture

If so, it will be because

If so, it will be because she gets mired in the quagmire W made. Once you're already in, I have at least some sympathy for not being able to get out. It may take some sort of "super genius" to do that. The GOP's best and brightest, their new Reagan, was the idiot who drove us directly into this mess, though. Don't let anyone forget that.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives