Breaking news on the KNS website about a retired accountant who will make a report to County Commission on spending in the Knox County Mayor's office.
According to the KNS report, the retired accountant has also "built a website." Here it is (we guess, no web site address is given in the article).
We were hoping for a blockbuster report. All we were able to find was a somewhat goofy letter to County Commission with a summary of the "findings".
We're glad that citizens are digging and demanding answers. We're a little surprised, though, that the KNS would give this particular citizen this much credibility.
The KNS was doing some good digging on all this lately (like they just recently discovered there was a county government to report on). But if this is the best they can come up with on the P-Card scandal, it sounds like it's "game over -- insert another quarter." There's always the Black Wednesday lawsuit...
UPDATE: From a letter to Ragsdale: "it appears that some documents were attached to the credit card disbursements records at one point in time as there are multiple staples holes but now there are no documents attached." There it is, the smoking gun!
|
Topics:
|
|
Discussing:
- Many in Nashville still without power (2 replies)
- Snow! Again. Maybe. (1 reply)
- President & Mrs. Obama: a wake-up call to every American (3 replies)
- Are you snow ready? (2 replies)
- Geographic Clarification (1 reply)
- Small dam in Walland to be removed (2 replies)
- Embarrassed? (1 reply)
- Feds looking for West Knox detention location? (6 replies)
- Search for Mike Johnson's Spine (2 replies)
- Trump says his 'own morality' is limit to his global power (3 replies)
- Pentagon seeks to reduce Sen. Mark Kelly's retirement rank over video urging troops to refuse illegal orders (2 replies)
- U.S. will look to tap Venezuelan oil reserves, Trump says (2 replies)
TN Progressive
- Alcoa Safe Streets Plan Survey (BlountViews)
- WATCH THIS SPACE. (Left Wing Cracker)
- Report on Blount County, TN, No Kings event (BlountViews)
- America As It Is Right Now (RoaneViews)
- A friend sent this: From Captain McElwee's Tall Tales of Roane County (RoaneViews)
- The Meidas Touch (RoaneViews)
- Massive Security Breach Analysis (RoaneViews)
- (Whitescreek Journal)
- Lee's Fried Chicken in Alcoa closed (BlountViews)
- Alcoa, Hall Rd. Corridor Study meeting, July 30, 2024 (BlountViews)
- My choices in the August election (Left Wing Cracker)
- July 4, 2024 - aka The Twilight Zone (Joe Powell)
TN Politics
- DOJ releases 3 million pages of Epstein files, taking in 180,000 images and 2,000 videos (TN Lookout)
- Tennessee governor urges better Nashville Electric Service efforts in winter storm (TN Lookout)
- ‘Not what our faith teaches’: Nashville faith groups host vigil outside Homeland Security office (TN Lookout)
- Partial federal government shutdown begins, amid hopes it won’t last long (TN Lookout)
- Rising health costs could shift midterm voters toward Democrats, survey shows (TN Lookout)
- Stockard on the Stump: Memphis mayor claims ICE cooperation only for fighting crime (TN Lookout)
Knox TN Today
- Vols down Auburn with defense, rebounding and free throws (Knox TN Today)
- POSTPONED: Annual Knox County legislative forum set for Jan. 31 (Knox TN Today)
- Lady Vols ‘out-toughed’ in loss to Bulldogs (Knox TN Today)
- Sarah Brobst + Felicia Harris Hoehne + Ice at Fall Creek Falls ++ (Knox TN Today)
- Dishing It Out: Slow Cooker Shredded Mexican Chicken (Knox TN Today)
- Harrington: Keeping his nose to the grindstone (Knox TN Today)
- Humane Society of the Tennessee Valley expands hours (Knox TN Today)
- HEADLINES: News and events from the World, the USA, Tennessee, Knox & Historic Notes (Knox TN Today)
- Don’t miss Snake Day and Zoo Camp at Zoo Knoxville (Knox TN Today)
- Food City supports Community Schools program (Knox TN Today)
- Knox the Fox visits Western Georgia cities (Knox TN Today)
- A Conversation with Gil Hough (Knox TN Today)
Local TV News
- How much snow did East Tennessee get over the weekend? (WATE)
- Knoxville Weather: Dangerously cold Sunday night into early Monday (WATE)
- Fire at Rockwood storage unit facility closes road (WATE)
- Knoxville Area Transit announces delay Monday morning (WATE)
- Lady Vols comeback vs. No. 1 UConn falls short (WATE)
- Two teens face alcohol-related charges after crash in Knoxville (WATE)
News Sentinel
State News
- ‘Defensive ends’ made a sizable difference for Vols against Auburn - Chattanooga Times Free Press (Times Free Press)
- UTC men show more fight in second half, but losing streak continues - Chattanooga Times Free Press (Times Free Press)
- UTC women extend streak with defense, Izzy McPherson’s hot shooting - Chattanooga Times Free Press (Times Free Press)
- Janice Keene Obituary - Chattanooga Times Free Press (Times Free Press)
Wire Reports
- Trump family crypto firm sold major stake to UAE investment firm - The Washington Post (Business)
- Gold, Silver Extend Declines After Dramatic Reversal of Rally - Bloomberg (Business)
- 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and father return to Minnesota from ICE facility in Texas - AP News (US News)
- ‘Historic storm’ delivers biggest snowfall in decades for North Carolina - The Washington Post (US News)
- Todd Blanche says review of Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking case ‘is over’ - The Guardian (US News)
- Warsh’s Return Revives Tensions Over the Fed’s $6.6 Trillion QE Hangover - Bloomberg (Business)
- Shares slip in Asia as metals melt, earnings loom - Reuters (Business)
- Starmer Urges Former Prince Andrew to Testify to Congress Over Epstein Ties - The New York Times (US News)
- Two federal agents reportedly identified in fatal shooting of Alex Pretti - The Guardian (US News)
- Stock futures fall after silver, bitcoin sell off; questions loom over AI trade: Live updates - CNBC (Business)
- Oil prices fall 4% on US-Iran de-escalation - Reuters (Business)
- Speaker Johnson is moving to end the shutdown by Tuesday — without Democratic support - Axios (US News)
- Democrat Wins Texas Special Election in District Trump Won By 17 Points - Forbes (US News)
- Federal Courts Undercut Trump’s Mass Deportation Campaign - The New York Times (US News)
- French tech giant Capgemini to sell US subsidiary accused of providing services to ICE - Euronews.com (Business)
Local Media
Lost Medicaid Funding
Search and Archives
TN Progressive
Nearby:
- Blount Dems
- Herston TN Family Law
- Inside of Knoxville
- Instapundit
- Jack Lail
- Jim Stovall
- Knox Dems
- MoxCarm Blue Streak
- Outdoor Knoxville
- Pittman Properties
- Reality Me
- Stop Alcoa Parkway
Beyond:
- Nashville Scene
- Nashville Post
- Smart City Memphis
- TN Dems
- TN Journal
- TN Lookout
- Bob Stepno
- Facing South

That is the correct website.
That is the correct website. There was also a story on WBIR.
(link...)
Look under the Services tab
Look under the Services tab for the link to the questionable expenses. For the record....WBIR broke the complete story first...and reported the website url.
For the record....WBIR broke
For the record....WBIR broke the complete story first...
And that's something WBIR should brag about?
ummm....wellum.....your
ummm....wellum.....your title says KNS Blockbuster....lol...KNS story is a teaser...WBIR has the meat of the report and hizzoner's response through the suddenly unmuted Mr. Van de Vate.
Lewis Cosby
Randy, I spoke with Cosby this morning. The weakness, I think, is in the presentation of his case, not with the case itself. Cosby is not a compelling writer, but a review of the 94 questions he posed to the Mayor's office indicate that he understands the necessity for internal controls and the way in which senior administration officials routinely violated the county's written policies. His letter won't be confused with a Hemingway missive, but he does know accounting.
Larry Van Guilder
>His letter won't be
>His letter won't be confused with a Hemingway missive
Ah, but I also doubt Ragsdale will respond to the audit with the brief statement: "Suggest you upstick books asswards"
your title says KNS
your title says KNS Blockbuster
Sorry, they still haven't invented/implemented HTML sarcasm tags.
I've never seen a good
I've never seen a good audit that is chocked with poetic prose. Numbers don't lie and he seems to have the numbers correct. It will be interesting to see what County Commission does with it and how the KNS bashes them for doing it....so it goes.
WBIR started this with the
WBIR started this with the CPA back a number of weeks ago (the site has the text of Kay Watson's story showing a 7/31 date).
I saw the story tonight and checked out the web site.
Interesting to see how Werner and Finch spent money.
he understands the necessity
he understands the necessity for internal controls
Seems like that train (Werner) has already left the station. And there's plenty of plausible deniability for those remaining at the top if they want to push it down to department heads.
But if y'all want to keep up the effort to pin it on the captain at the helm, I suppose you could make that case.
So far, though, the captain is giving y'all the finger on the whole thing, including defending his department heads, and getting away with it.
At some point the public is going to start wondering why that is, and if it's because there's no "there" there. Especially if you trot out this guy as the latest champion for your cause, from talk radio no less.
(The only medium with less credibility than "weekly tabloids", with apologies to Hornback, or blogs is talk radio. Heh.)
At this point, I'm just trying to figure out what Ragsdale did to piss off Hartmann in such a huge way. But I'm sure it has nothing to do with who the Haslams want to run for Governor in 2010.
Two things might just
Two things might just happen...1. County Commission sets a special called meeting for the Saturday after the audit is done, votes to investigate charter violations and subpeona everyone with a swinging ID tag. or 2. Calls on hizzoner to respond to Cosby's presentation at the commission meeting. Will want to pack your lunch for this one I'd say.
His letter won't be confused
His letter won't be confused with a Hemingway missive, but he does know accounting.
And yet, you seem to be able to write OK.
And yet, you seem to be able to write OK.
Randy, I'm a genetic freak. :-)
Larry Van Guilder
Trains
Seems like that train (Werner) has already left the station.
Point taken, R, but the Nashville express has disembarked some passengers on the sixth floor who may have the last word about the "captain's" duty to keep a proper log.
(Geez, trains and ships in the same crappy metaphor.)
Larry Van Guilder
OK, I'll cop to crappy mixed
OK, I'll cop to crappy mixed metaphors. But I don't get paid to make them up. Especially at this hour of the night.
Crappy mixed metaphors
Actually, Randy, I was referring to my own crappy mixed metaphor.
Larry Van Guilder
Surely you jest
At this point, I'm just trying to figure out what Ragsdale did to piss off Hartmann in such a huge way. But I'm sure it has nothing to do with who the Haslams want to run for Governor in 2010.
Randy: You can't be serious!
Ragsdale's abuses of power has been the top local story for almost 7 years. The Sentinel and WBIR-TV are just late to it and they're making up for lost time.
Some p.r. flack told me once that it didn't matter what the Shopper published. "As long as we keep the Sentinel and Channel 10 happy....." they had no problems. Victor operated on that theory too, but he kept the big dogs on the porch.
Ragsdale has managed to get every medium in town digging into his affairs. Wait until you see what Larry VG has dug up for Monday's Shopper. -- s.
Whole team at work?
"...we guess, no web site address is given..."
"We were hoping for a blockbuster report..."
"All we were able to find was a somewhat goofy letter..."
"We're glad that citizens are digging and demanding answers."
"We're a little surprised, though, that the KNS would give this particular citizen this much credibility..."
I couldn't help but notice that the entire R. Neal Blog Team appears to have been researching this question...
I couldn't help but notice
I couldn't help but notice that the entire R. Neal Blog Team appears to have been researching this question...
The Truth Squat has assisted in the preparization of our report.
From the KNS story... Entire
From the KNS story...
Entire P-card monthly statements are missing from Finch’s file as well.
I can understand misplacing or forgetting a few receipts, but entire monthly credit card statements? Think those are in the shredder somewhere?
CBT
Okay now, let me try keep this p-card mess straight.
As the p-card scandal has unfolded, I have tried to keep up with all the players and their possible misdeeds. I'm not very knowledgeable about all the players and do not have a memory of their lives previous to this moment, so I may be like many other taxpayers. As I attempted to understand the facts in all of this, I have made some notes. It will help me sort all this better if anyone can point out where any of my conclusions are wrong or weak.
Notes To myself on the p-card scandal
It is abundantly obvious that insufficient records were kept by numerous departments regarding p-card requests, charges, reimbursements.
Charges were made that appear to be at a minimum confusing and at a maximum downright fraud.
If fraud occured then Ragsdale has to be held responsible. Keeping track of finances is part of his job description. Either way, Mayor Ragsdale should probably resign as it is apparent even early on that he was not on top of his responsibility to oversee all county expeditures.
Retroactively getting accurate documentation and receipts will require a considerable amount of time.
Okay, so number phobia makes it hard to read about all this. Numbers seldom lie though, so better dig in and try.
It should be kept in mind that some people were probably merely slack about receipts because no one demanded them or asked questions. Some of the accused may merely have been shoddy record keepers. They should not be boiled in the same pot with those who knew they were cheating or "double dipping".
The audit requested by the Mayor will provide more answers, but it will also probably also raise more questions.
The overly emotional reaction to this scandal should be left out of the hard business of completing a serious audit. The local media and those taxpayers who have come forward to demand an explanation have every right to demand answers and vent their anger, but too much rhetoric confuses everyone and having a bias (overt or hidden) does not help the taxpayers of Knox County realize the truth of the situation It does sometimes however make things more interesting.
All people with questionable undocumented p-card purchases should have to (on their own time and in a timely manner), come up with these or provide a reason why they can't. Until this procedure is accomplished, a credible audit is impossible. Until everyone embroiled in this problem has had their say, all parties should be considered innocent of wrongdoing, and only people with this attitude should be in charge of investigating the p-card problems. A witchhunt helps no one. We taxpayers deserve the truth, not a dog-and-pony show.
Why do I keep using words that connotate shellfish?
With all the passion going on and jockeying for the spotlight, it's important to not get sucked prematurely into one side or the over.
Yeah, good luck with that!
And this gem from
And this gem from Cosby...
Knox County granted $40,000 in July 2006 for a minority health summit in Nashville with “nothing in the file” dated earlier than a few days before the check was mailed. How did the mayor’s office recommend a grant for commission approval in June 2006 that hadn’t yet been requested?
A health summit in Nashville? Maybe there's a legitimate explanation somewhere. Of course, it could also be because the person in charge of grants in Knox County is also on the board of the group putting on the event. If I'm wrong and Cynthia Finch isn't connected to this group, please correct me.
"A health summit in
"A health summit in Nashville? Maybe there's a legitimate explanation somewhere......."
Well, if you check out the link, you'll see Ragsdale is a speaker there.
I guess this is a good way to speak to a crowd in Nashville if you're going to run for state-wide office someday.
(link...) and then go to "agenda"
This event is going on right now.
That might have been spent to bring the MHS here
I don't know anything about the Nashville one, but I attended the Annual Minority Health Summit that was held here in Knoxville. It was a very professional event with nationally known speakers and one of the better organized and useful conferences I've ever been to.
Minority Health is a very huge issue nationally right now. It encompasses a number of minority populations including the economically disadvantaged. Knoxville's hosting of the Summit showed a commitment to this underserved population and certainly the Summit raised a lot of local health workers' conciousness about the problems they face. It also offered important current data and discussed best practices. This could help attract national funds and encourage grants that could benefit health in the poverty stricken areas of the County.
The MHS was also very well attended by out-of-towners. Like a convention, it probably did have a positive effect on our local economy. At the time I felt Knoxville was very lucky to have the Summit here.
I don't know about the receipt problem or exactly how the money was spent item-by-item, but I can see why the County and the City might have contributed monies to the Health Summit.
Maybe other cities, counties and state organizations also helped sponsor this event?
P-Card abuses
Charges were made that appear to be at a minimum confusing and at a maximum downright fraud.
Ragsdale charged the co-pay for his colonoscopy on his county P-card.
The list of abuses is overwhelming ... but the bottom line is that Ragsdale and his senior staff (Suite 615) used their Hospitality Fund, Travel Allowance, and county P-cards indiscriminately to support a high-flying lifestyle that most Knox County residents can't afford and many find extravagant.
Ragsdale should resign. -- s.
Review of Hospitality Fund Procedures
I continue to conduct my "armchair audit" of these various allegations piecemeal (to the irritation of some here, I realize), but think through this with me, if you would...
Here's the text of what Creekmore indicated is the state statute outlining procedures to have been followed WRT receipt of gifts, as in donations to the defunct Hospitality Fund:
5-8-101. Sources of county revenue — Gifts and donations. —
(a) County revenue is derived from taxes on property, privileges, litigation, merchants, peddlers; from fines and forfeitures; and from money remaining unclaimed more than two (2) years in clerks' offices.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, a county is authorized to accept and receive gifts and donations of money, intangible personal property, tangible personal property and real property. If any such gift or donation is offered subject to conditional or restrictive terms, then the gift must be accepted by majority vote of the county legislative body and must be used by the county subject to the terms of such conditions or restrictions. If an unrestricted gift or donation of money is accepted and received, then such money must be deposited in the county general fund and must be appropriated and expended in accordance with county budgetary procedures. If an unrestricted gift or donation of personal or real property is accepted and received, and if the property is subsequently leased or sold, then the proceeds from such lease or sale must be deposited in the county general fund and must be appropriated in accordance with county budgetary procedures.
[Code 1858, § 482; Shan., § 644; mod. Code 1932, § 1035; impl. am. Acts 1963, ch. 14, § 1; Acts 1979, ch. 23, § 5; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 5-801; Acts 1999, ch. 109, § 1.]
(link...)
Now, the statute distinguishes between "restricted" and "unrestricted" gifts, right?
WRT "restricted" gifts, it appears to me that the practices that were in place were adequate.
That is, 1) no requirement appears to exist in the statute to deposit these "restricted" gifts in the general fund, so the fact that they weren't does not appear to be relevant; 2) the requirement in the statute that County Commission must accept the "restricted" gifts by majority vote *was* being met when commission adopted that annual resolution to accept *all* gifts directed to *all* county departments, most recently in June, 2007 (per Owings); 3) the requirement in the statute that the "restricted" gifts be spent in the manner the donor specifies *does* appear to have obligated the Mayor's Office staff to spend in whatever manner was intended by or acceptable to the donor, irrespective of whether that expenditure was acceptable to taxpayers, and it *does not* yet appear that the Mayor's Office failed to do so.
I do note that the expense for a Homeland Security brochure was erroneously charged to an account other than the Hospitality Fund, but the brochure was nevertheless prepared and distributed per the donor's instruction and the charging error may be, or likely was, easily corrected by journal entry. WRT the Hospitality Fund then reflecting a negative balance of $1655 after posting such a journal entry, I would expect staff accountants in the Finance Department to have easily extracted a mere $1655 in non-objectionable expenses charged there and to have recoded them to impact other GL accounts, rather than the Hospitality Fund. No negative balance in the Hospitality Fund would have then ensued, and neither is an adjustment of this sort anything unusual.
WRT "unrestricted" gifts, there was just one practice in place that I can say with certainty was in error, but even as concerns that practice, both the Mayor's Office and County Commission may be culpable for the error.
That is, a requirement exists in the statute for Werner to have deposited those "unrestricted" gifts in the general fund and for County Commission to have budgeted them through their "budgetary process."
So, in assigning culpability for that error, I need to know if commissioners knew of the existence of the Hospitality Fund prior to this summer. If they did, I'm not reasonable to charge Werner with failure to know the guiding statute, and with failure to deposit the "unrestricted" gifts in the general fund, if I neglect to charge commissioners with a corresponding failure to know that same statue, and with failure to ask why no deposits were submitted for their budgetary assignment. If commissioners knew the Hospitality Fund existed, then, it would appear that neither party, Werner nor commissioners, knew what operational process the statute required of them.
Furthermore, an apparent assumption on the part of taxpayers that commissioners might have involved themselves in the line-item budgetary assignment of those "unrestricted" gifts as small as $500 or even $5000 may or may not be reasonable. The statute above doesn't answer the question, and the total dollars flowing through the Hospitality Fund over the last five years, around $60000 total or $12000 per year on average, were quite miniscule within the context of a $6 million budget (.2%, in fact). Do commissioners routinely go there? I don't know. If so, would they have disallowed any past expenditures? I don't know that, either, but even if they had allowed the expenses, I still do not see that taxpayers would have been impacted in any way.
Finally, an apparent assumption on the part of taxpayers that they were entitled a say in the appropriation of those "unrestricted" gifts seems to me unreasonable, given that the gifts were proffered by others, not taxpayers. Such gifts were essentially a contract between donors and the Mayor's Office, then, as was the case in gifts proffered to any other county department.
Provided the resulting expenditures were not illegal, whence this taxpayer demand to have been consulted on the appropriation? After all, the Hospitality Fund was established for the express purpose of covering those costs taxpayers might not have cared to cover.
It is reasonable, of course, for taxpayers to ask whether the acceptance of any of these gifts resulted in their taxes subsequently being misspent on dubious contracts with the same donors. No investigation of this question has yet begun, though, by either Walls or the media, so no fodder yet exists to concern me.
Personally, then, I continue to await a review of any no bid contracts extended to Hospitality Fund donors, and possibly a review of the legality of all Hospitality Fund expenditures (falling within the applicable statute of time limitations).
Information available to me right now, though, does not cause me any burning concerns for either the legality of known and applicable expenditures nor the management of taxpayer monies.
It appears Commission has a
It appears Commission has a few problems of their own with discretionary funds.
I hate it when I agree with Greg Johnson.....
Too bad
Too bad Mr. Hornback was banned, I would love to hear his screams over this thread. He would be yelling at the top of his lungs about Ms. Clark's latest contribution. Probably something like - EW Scripps employee calls for Ragsdale's resignation!!!! But with more misspells, and more harshness.
you'll see Ragsdale is a
you'll see Ragsdale is a speaker there.
Interesting info. Is Finch also on the board of the group putting on the event and receiving ghe grant? Other than Ragsdale speaking, what did it have to do with Knox County? I guess 'health' applies to us all, but was there any specific return for the $40,000?
CBT
There are some folks from
There are some folks from here on the Minority Health Advisory Board (link...)
The Regional Minority Health Coalition for Knoxville/East Central (one of 6 coordinators in the state) is an organization called TennCorp
(link...)
The benefit of the Summit will I think prove to be valid
It's easy to knock something you have little knowledge about. Regardless of the ins and outs of Finch or Ragsdale's dealings with it, I really believe the Minority Health Summit is of great value to health providers and to comsumers in Knox County. The content of the conference should be most important, not the fact that Finch and Ragsdale are appearing there.
As a taxpayer I am happy to see my money going towards such an important event as the Health Summit, in Nashville or elsewhere in the state. From what I've seen the $40,000 Knox County contribution or sponsorship fee is probably not out of line.
Please don't try to degrade and destroy something as honorable and important as the Minority Health Summit just because Ragsdale & Finch were involved or because it is focused on the economically disadvantaged (ie black in many peoples' minds). You would be doing a great dis-service to the many citizens in Knox County whose health is at risk.
hit dont look good
hit just dont
Shredder
I can't remember who it was, but someone mentioned that Warner was seen using the shredder for a couple of days before he left.
Shredder
If I'm not mistaken, they can shred all the monthly statements they want. The information can be acquired forensically from the credit card company by a subpoena. Only the supporting documentation is gone.
Unless I've missed it I
Unless I've missed it I haven't seen anyone state the obvious and simple, which is that Ragsdale in part has been using public funds to finance his own political courtship, local and statewide, with African-American voters. Hence the minority health summit in Nashville, defiance in defense of Finch, minority grants, etc. He's still doing it or Finch would have gone the route of Bone and Lloyd, who were expendable as long as he stands by Finch.
He's following the model of Ashe and Shcumpert, who were smoother and did well in East Knoxville, for good reason. But Rags overdid it with loose money, just as he has fumbled everything else with loose money and few acct'g controls. A competent finance director could have pulled this off for him. Had Rags begged Kathy Hamilton to work for him, the main focus would still be on Scoob and Comm'n.
numbers, numbers...
it is all so confusing. better to rely on what we already believed before we got all this informantion.
Documents
I think some needs to ask SunTrust and BB&T for complete credit card statements and monthly bank statements of the accounts in questions... let's quit messing around with Ragsdale and his stall tactics... let's get the info from the source aka the banks...
Re: Shredder
And that's the issue or at least one of the issues. As a matter of accounting/auditing practice, expenditures should be supported by original documentation not by vendor/credit card statements.
I hate it when I agree with Greg Johnson.....
You'd hate it more if he had simply appropriated your story, right down to dollar amounts, that appeared months ago in the Shopper News. I guess the KNS gets what they pay for.
Larry Van Guilder
I knew I'd seen that stuff
I knew I'd seen that stuff somewhere before...
Louis Cosby
Offhand, it would appear that Mayor Ragsdale has no legal obligation to respond to Cosby's questions any more than City Council has the obligation to respond to comments made during the public forum. It would also appear the Cosby is somewhat premature in making his findings public given that Wall's audit of the P-card accounts has not been completed.
On the other hand, Cosby's volunteer time as an experienced auditor certainly should speed up Wall's audit and should result in a significant reduction of the fees to be charged by the State Comptrollers Office.
As reported by WBIR, I find it interesting that at one point Van de Vate states that Cosby can review the ongoing audit when it is issued and later is reported as follows:
What Van de Vate appears to ignore is the fact that it has already cost thousands of dollars in staff time paying senior staff for not properly documenting and accounting for what appears to be questionable expenditures of public funds.
Cosby & Wall's Audit
Actually, Wall's audit is completed. The 1st draft was sent to Ragsdale, and he has been given two weeks to respond so Wall's can write the final draft.
Status of travel allowance audit
Debbie, I understand that the draft now with Ragsdale (it's the second--Walls sent one to Ragsdale on June 25) covers just his review of travel allowances.
Walls et al are only now turning to p-cards and/or hospitality fund and/or community grants, and it's just been a week or so ago that HUD's assistance was solicited. My guess is that at least six months will be needed, but likely longer than that.
(Again, Cosby's a nutcase.)
Stan
(No, that utility district audit took place in 1995, if that makes any difference.)
Louis Cosby
I seriously doubt both Cosby's motives and his credentials as a qualified auditor.
Our first question should be to ask why Cosby would presume to leapfrog an audit already underway by a team specifically commissioned and uniquely qualified to conduct it, presently Walls and his staff of four in the department of County Audit, augmented by staff in the Comptroller's Office.
Those circumstances and his aforementioned functional illiteracy aside, Cosby has not worked as a licensed CPA for nearly 20 years. At the time he last did work in that capacity, those old carbonized "pegboard" bookeeping systems (dating to the 1940's) were still in wide use.
To call his release of so-called findings "premature" is an understatement. I could say just that it not customary for a one-man audit team of any qualification to be releasing any "findings" after just 16 hours scrutiny of records for a entity employing thousands and maintaining nearly $1 billion in assets, especially prior to reviewing those "findings" with affected parties, but I'm entitled to say that it is entirely unconscionable.
I can't imagine, either, that local government is obligated to spend any significant amount of time with Cosby to interpret for him the voluminous amount of records that would actually be reviewed in conducting a true audit. Surely the reams of answers he is requesting from respondents are beyond what is afforded him under any applicable open records laws.
And surely Cosby's perfunctory and idiotic approach to this task would have cost him his license, if he had one to lose.
(Stan, I wouldn't imagine that any work performed by Cosby would negate the need for the commissioned audit team to perform the same tests and reviews for themselves? Also, I don't recall receiving any bill from the Comptroller's Office after they audited the utility district where I served as Business Manager? IIRC, that was in 1998 or 1999.)
Answer to Knoxview
Tamara, we have never met but I am surprised that you would call me a nutcase. I am still a CPA just "inactive" for the last few years as I have not maintained CPE credits. My license could be reactivated with about 40 or so hours of CPE if I so chose. I see that you have been associated with a utility in accounting. I was the lead audit manager on the TVA outside audit performed by the international accounting firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers for five years. TVA had around $ 28 billion in assets, $ 7 billion in revenue, and at that time 60,000 employees as it was not only the largest electric public utility but America’s second largest construction company as TVA builds it own generating facilities. Yes, TVA had computers and the Finance department had 455 accountants. The audit took about 5,000 hours and the partner on the account was the industry chairman for the firm. I see that you also have been in broadcasting as assistant bookkeeper at WKCH-TV. I too have been in broadcasting for the last twenty or so years. I formed a group to apply for the license for channel 8 from the FCC. It took 8 years and we were the winners over 12 other groups including the “Butcher” group. I started, owned and was General Manager of WVLT-TV (then WKXT-TV) Ch 8 in 1988 and sold it to Gray Communications in 1996. I started, owned and was General Manager of WBXX-TV channel 20 the CW affiliate until we sold it to ACME Communications in 1997. I stayed with them as General Manager for about a year after we sold that station. In 2004 I signed on, with my partners South Central Communications ,WMAK-DT channel 7 the nations first full power digital only VHF station. I am the only person to have ever started three full power TV stations in a single market.
I have never said that I have performed an audit of these records. Check my correspondence to the County Commissioners. I have reviewed what was made available. These records are borderline “unaduitable.” I have asked for additional information, As to the 16-18 hours that is the time I was on sight scanning records etc. Many, many more hours were spent reviewing the documents, linking the inconsistances, writing the questions that did not get answered and ultimately forming my opinion as a concerned citizen that at one time audited Knox County too. Before, I started I spoke to the Knox County Internal Auditor to make sure I was not interrupting or interfering. I have shared with him copies of what I have found and questions.
It is hard to make my questions read like a novel as that is not the purpose of the writing. I have also been very careful not to misstate any facts. Numbers and financial writing are boring by nature. Sorry about spelling.
As to you “armchair audit”, you can go down and look at the same records Larry and I did. All of these public records are available to review during normal business hours. Contact Dwight Van de Vate at the Mayor’s office. I think you will come to the same conclusions.
I think if you check with Betty Bean she will vouch for me. Betty is the best reporter in town. I spoke with Larry for about 45 minutes on Thursday comparing notes and we were in 100% agreement on what we had seen and our opinions.
I have no agenda other than I am mad as taxpayer as to the mismanagement of the Knox County Mayor’s office and I don’t mind saying it to anyone who will listen. I do it public too. Having been in media here in Knoxville, I think I did pretty well getting my point out this past Thursday. I did not need Moxley or Ackerman to get above the fold on the front page of KNS and on both Ch 6 and Ch 10 6:00 pm news.
I think everyone is missing the point if you make me the story. It is Mayor’s Ragsdale that has the problems. I am stating that until the Mayor’s staff completes the required TER (Knox County expense reports) and pays back undocumented or inappropriate expenses, the audit will take months and cost A LOT (Knox County taxpayer will have to pay for this special audit by the Division of County Audit). If the Mayor and staff completed the required documents the audit would take a week of field work. Remember the P-card records for the Mayor’s staff would fit in Doyle Banana box.
I hope that answers all of your questions. Lewis Cosby.
Hello, Lewis
Hello, Lewis. My apologies for calling you a "nutcase." It isn't my habit to namecall, but it's true that I question your inserting yourself in this on-going audit by county and state officials. I suppose I'm not satisfied that your sole intent is to save money for Knox County.
And actually, I hadn't asked any questions, but your letter to Mayor Ragsdale raises a number of them, as to how much you understand, or perhaps want to understand, of the proper role of individual mayor's office employees, and of events already unfolded there.
For instance, why do you refer in that letter to the mayor as the "chief fiscal agent of the county?" Are you not aware that Mayor Ragsdale is the Chief Executive Officer of the county, and John Werner was its chief fiscal agent during the period in question?
Your letter also confuses (twice) a statement contained in the mayor's July 9 "Management Response to the Findings" of auditor Richard Walls' first draft review on auto allowances. You attribute Walls' comment that he has observed "a classic case of management override of controls" to Mayor Ragsdale, instead (in spite of the fact that it would make no sense for the mayor to say such a thing). Were you unable to distinguish the auditor's findings from the mayor's responses in that document?
Then you assert that the mayor has "pass(ed) out 350 credit cards," but that's not correct, either. Are you not aware of recurrent KNS news coverage reporting that there were formerly 170 p-cards in use in the mayor's office? How do you presume to review these p-cards personally, if you don't know how many exist?
Then you charge the mayor with "not contribut(ing) an amount to Knox County for nearly two years before this credit card abuse was identified," but that's not correct, either. Are you not aware of the mayor's June 28 memo to Controller John Troyer, detailing his nine checks written to the county between 2005 and 2007? How do you presume to review them personally, if you don't know they exist?
Then you charge the mayor with having failed to "do one thing correct" with regard to a June 18 letter from Deputy Law Director David Creekmore (although you indicate it was from Owings), offering suggestions as to how the Hospitality Fund might be managed. Are you not aware that Deputy Creekmore issued a second letter to the mayor's office on July 13, superseding the first? How do you presume to determine whether processes required by the law are in place, if you don't know what those processes are?
Then you assert that the mayor's Hospitality Fund operated "outside the budgetary process of Knox County." Are you not aware that all gifts to Knox County are accepted by resolution as part of the County Commission's annual budget process, most recently in June, 2007?
Then you assert, concerning the Hospitality Fund, that "this type of thing has never been allowed." Are you not aware of the school system's Partners in Education program, the library's Friends of the Library program, and the Sheriff Department's DARE and SCAN programs?
Finally, you comment on the mayor's public policy on economic development, opining that you "did not see a single expenditure that in (your) opinion had any economic development purpose." Are you not aware that such an observation is really outside the scope of an audit, or even the review you more recently maintain you are performing?
I count eight questions, then, Lewis, on the basis of this one letter you wrote to the mayor. It's possible they arise just due to some honest oversights on your part, or its possible they are indicative of an agenda. Can you explain?
Chief fiscal agent is the
Chief fiscal agent is the County Mayor see section 3.03 of Knox County Charter
Mr Werner is Director of Finance
"a classic case of management override of controls" is a quote from the Mayor Ragsdale. See WATE web site for Mayor's quote to media after July 6th Ethics Committee meeting
350 cards were passed out and used until July 5th when the number was cut to 170
Check you dates Mr Ragsdale did not contribute to his "in case I make a mistake fund" for almost two years till May 23, 2007,
Check my web site (link...) for both letters. Mr. Creekmore July 13 letter did not supercede but ADDED to the previous letter. Also note comment at the bottom of his memo to Mr. Arms that sums it all up.
The Hospitality Fund was on the Knox County General Fund Balance Sheet!!! It was not on any budget submited by Mr. Ragsdale to County Commission. Tamara, you miss the whole point The Knox County Hospitality fund was not intented to be funded by taxpayer's money. But was overdrawn since May 5, 2005. You are sadly mistaken if you think this was budgeted.
....."Are you not aware that all gifts to Knox County are accepted by resolution as part of the County Commission's annual budget process, most recently in June, 2007? " This did happen you are quoting the law but that is not what happened that is why it is being closed.
The Hospitality Fund was classic case of a "slush fund" Look it up. The other funds are not slush funds.
As to economic development look on the back of the credit card receipts and tell me if Mr. Werner personal bar bills are economic develpoment.
You need to spends some time with the real documents.
Timing, context, and autonomy
"You need to spends some time with the real documents."
I have to answer this comment first, Lewis. No, I don't think I need to spend time now rooting through boxes of documents. I think that time has come and gone.
Media have already shone a bright light on what has been found in some of those boxes, saturating citizens with a deluge of various and sundry concerns.
At this point in the needed review, what citizen onlookers require is context and an assurance that reviewers on the job are working autonomously to answer those many concerns.
One of my objections to your inserting yourself in this process now, then, is that the county's internal audit department is already at work, the State Comptroller's staff are in the loop and on the way, and HUD will soon enter the fray, as well. You enter the drama too late.
I also object to what appears to be a purposeful attempt on your part to skew the context of concerns already illuminated. In your letter to the mayor, for instance, you charge him with failing to "review the (p-card) charges and approve them," as if the County Mayor should be spending his days poring over the data input sheets of payables clerks.
At the same time, you discount completely that in his capacity as "chief fiscal officer" (yes, I find the reference), the mayor has already discharged the party (Werner) who is, in practice, truly charged with establishing and maintaining those daily controls suspected to be absent in p-card processes. You seem to play on the ignorance of citizen onlookers, then, as to how the mayor might reasonably be expected to fulfill his duties for fiscal oversight.
Finally, and most importantly, I object to your apparent bent on the continued sensationalizing of these various concerns, even through what will be the tedious and time-consuming process of independent auditors' examination of the facts.
There is no role now for anyone, including yourself, to be directing independent auditors toward just those matters he believes to be pertinent--nor any role for websites and talk radio, either.
Your or anyone's efforts of this sort would cost citizen onlookers an understanding of the true scope of valid concerns, stripping auditors' resulting report of much-needed context.
Should auditors allow themselves to be led about by the nose in this manner, their resulting report would also be stripped of the autonomy citizen onlookers so desperately require of them.
Rikki isn't trying to divert attention from valid concerns in the mayor's office, then, when he alludes to likely concerns in the Sheriff's Department of larger scope. Neither is knoxquerious trivializing those concerns when he urges a broader review department-wide. And no, for all the furor my comments have clearly incited, I do not take a side.
However the three of us--Rikki, knox, and me--may differ on the details of what we imagine must happen now, what I'm sure you're hearing from us all is an appeal for credibilty and independence on the part of the auditors to involve themselves in this review, and perhaps a desire, too, that our confidence in local government county wide might be restored through this process already begun.
Please, then, don't sully that process.
Then you assert, concerning
Then you assert, concerning the Hospitality Fund, that "this type of thing has never been allowed." Are you not aware of the school system's Partners in Education program, the library's Friends of the Library program, and the Sheriff Department's DARE and SCAN programs?
Friends of the Library is not a library program. It's a 501(c)(3). It exists to support reading and the library and it spends a lot of $$ on library programs, but is an independent organization. When I worked there, we rarely (if ever) wrote a check directly to the library - rather, we paid invoices from vendors on items/services we had agreed in advance to underwrite.
That's fundamentally different from the hospitality account.
P.S. Bubba - where'd the tag, link, etc. options disappear to?
I love it!
I read the article this morning, and loved it!
Stan and Tamara, and all of you other accountants should too.
A lone cowpoke came into town, wearing a white ten-gallon hat. He is the Accountant Cowboy. Dom de dom de dom!!!
He is clearing the streets and asking for records.
It is time to show 'em or fold 'em.
Go get 'um, I say! Yay!!!!!!
Cosby & Wall's Audit
As Tamara mentions above, Walls has not completed his audit of the P-card accounts nor of the grant funds. It would appear based on his correspondence that Cosby reviewed the P-card and the so-called Mayor's Hospitality Account.
This from the News-Sentinel, Sunday, August 19, 2008:
Re: Louis Cosby
Tamara,
I don't recall having ever met Louis Cosby; however, it's my understanding that he became involved when Mayor Ragsdale invited him to review the records. It appears to me that having the time and the experience, he called the Mayor's bluff. Does he seriously expect the Mayor to respond to his questions? I don't know. Again, it appears to me that he is simply making the point that all is not by the book in Ragsville.
And what difference does it make whether he last audited a computerized system, a pegboard system, or a quill and inkwell system? I suspect he looked at paid vouchers and the supporting documents when there were supporting documents. How many, I don’t know, but to suggest he performed an audit of the county and all of its employees makes no sense.
I am not suggesting that “the commissioned audit team” will not have to review the same records that Cosby reviewed. What I am saying is that he has given them a heads up on many discrepancies that they need to review. In my opinion, a 100% review of the files, which I suspect Cosby did, is more reliable than any statistical sampling that the Comptrollers office might normally use.
As for the fee, the difference I suspect is that your audit was one the Comptrollers office was required to perform. The county, in contrast, is requesting assistance for which it will be charged a fee. Again, from the KNS of Sunday, August 19, 2008:
Re: Louis Cosby
I would agree with you, Stan, that Cosby appears intent on making a point, but, of course, that should not be the perspective of an auditor, a priori.
In my personal experience of "cleaning up" after scores of bungling bookeepers and accountants over nearly 25 years (and it seemed that virtually everywhere I landed, I had to), whether or not my predecessor was knowledgeable of the applications software in use made all the difference in the world.
From understanding whether an automated bank reconciliation program had actually reconciled a particular bank account, to being able to decipher the obtuse in-and-out transactions posted to a suspense account, to knowing whether subsidiary "modules" were integrated with the GL, or were perhaps being used independently, an accountant who may have last worked with a 1940's-era "pegboard" system is bound to accomplish scarce little in just two work days (16 hours).
Yet Cosby told the N-S that he has "searched through procurement card receipts, community grant files, and hospitality fund documents" in that time? And he has posted his "findings," as he calls them, at a website he created? And he plans to present them to County Commission? It is Cosby who implies that he has conducted an audit of the county, not me.
But do you really suspect that this man has done a "100% review of the files," all these p-card and community grant and hospitality fund files, in just two days? When Walls and a staff of four, along with help from the Comptroller's Office, have all worked two full months just on travel allowances? I'm sorry, but I think that's highly unlikely, if not physically impossible.
I do take the *official* inquiry quite seriously. I am most concerned about the p-card transactions and the travel allowances. Community grants could also prove to be a mess, but I feel we outsiders still know too little about the applicable law pertaining to these transactions to guess how the dust might settle. I'm currently optimistic that the hospitality fund transactions will largely pass muster, provided the $10K contract with Harber occurred too long ago, and provided we don't learn of dubious no-bid contracts with donors.
I don't dispute the potential for bonafide "findings," then, but I readily concede that it matters a great deal to me who "finds" them--and in what length of time.
Just like I want Rick Hollow, not Herb Moncier, advancing our case in the matter of the commission appointments, I want Walls and the Comptroller's Office, not an illiterate accountant of 20 years ago and a rising talk radio star since last week, reviewing our case in the mayor's office.
(The Comptroller's Office audit of my former utility district employer was "required" only in the sense that a whistle-blowing terminated employee requested it. That is, it was not performed according to any routine or recurring schedule of audits. Do you suppose that the "agreement" mentioned in the N-S could refer to defining the scope of work, or are you pretty certain that it refers to estimating a projected cost?)
"To call his release of
"To call his release of so-called findings "premature" is an understatement. I could say just that it not customary for a one-man audit team of any qualification to be releasing any "findings" after just 16 hours scrutiny of records for a entity employing thousands and maintaining nearly $1 billion in assets, especially prior to reviewing those "findings" with affected parties, but I'm entitled to say that it is entirely unconscionable." Tamara Shepherd
I don't know who you are, you don't know who I am, but where do you get off saying stuff like this (and all the other stuff in the rest of this post and elsewhere)?
Does he needs your phone number to call and get your blessing before doing something?
BTW, on a different subject, do you realize it looks like you post on what looks like every single entry on this blog? I wouldn't be suprised over the same period of time you've put more on this site than the guy who owns it. On a per word basis, you've more than blessed me with your infinite wisdom. You may be a nice person for all I know, but geez.
Ms.Shepherd
Your comments are out of focus..guess thats what happens when one hangs out at the pond & talks to the ducks.
Tamara - (Again, Cosby's a nutcase.)
Tamara: Have you been to the county purchasing office on Central Avenue and seen the records that prompted Cosby's 94 questions? I have, and I can assure they are a disgrace. His inquiry was pointed, aimed right at the heart of the matter, which is the blatant disregard of senior Ragsdale administration officials for the very policies they purport to abide by.
Is it crowded on Dead-ender street? Take off your blinders.
Larry Van Guilder
Replies
Pickens: I'm opining so much on these accounting-related matters, and asking so many questions, too, because I'm a former accountant by training and vocation for nearly 25 years AND because I'm very interested in this audit.
I'm writing so much on this blog (but almost exclusively on threads relating to local issues, you'll find) because I enjoy the people here AND because I'm recently doing some paid writing, as Bill references. I pick up some information here in the back-and-forth, and sometimes it's even correct information.
I'm really an OK person, I'm told, and you'd find me to be honest.
Bill: If you'd asked me about my recent relationship with the Fountain City Focus, I'd have been glad to share. I write just a couple of school-related items for them weekly, since May, and I work exclusively from my home, not "at the duck pond." I've met Steve Hunley face-to-face twice ever, although we sometimes speak by phone.
I realize there is some rivalry between the Focus and the Shopper, and that some people here don't care for Steve, either. I have absolutely no interest in inserting myself into those sorts of squabbles, especially since I've known Betty (and her siblings) and Sandra for quite a long time, too.
Over time, I really think you'll come to feel that I form my opinions on the basis of what verifiable information I believe I have, not on the basis of preserving any alliances I might be purported to have.
Meanwhile, rest assured in your recollection of first meeting me at the biannual meeting for the Knox County Democratic Party. Nothing's changed on my end.
Larry: I don't mean to discount the concerns you've raised, I'm just anxious to see this on-going audit place them all in some context that will give us a clearer idea of the scope of the problem, and will possibly help us determine whether these are concerns of lax procedures or purposeful illegalities.
I better turn in now. Pickens is counting my words ;-)
Over time, I really think
Over time, I really think you'll come to feel that I form my opinions on the basis of what verifiable information I believe I have, not on the basis of preserving any alliances I might be purported to have.
If thats your standard then it sort of discredits you when you call someone you've never met a nutcase. You're also forgetting that Mr. Mayor invited Mr. Cosby to "swing by and have a look". Also, your criticism of his accounting methods is pretty lame. I don't care if he uses an abacus...numbers are numbers whether you use a computer or count on fingers and toes.
Bizzy
"...it sort of discredits you when you call someone you've never met a nutcase."
True enough. See my clarification offered on "Curiouser and Curiouser" thread.
"...criticism of his accounting methods is pretty lame."
Sorry, but I can't make any concession on this point.
Reviewing Cosby's 8/19 letter to Ragsdale now (see Randy's update, top of this thread) with yellow highlighter in hand to flag his errors and misstatements. FYI, my copy of his letter is pretty darn yellow. Letter opens with his attributing comments made by Walls to Ragsdale, instead, and goes downhill from there...
Would really recommend, too, that others here make the same effort to cross-ref Cosby's allegations against reporting previously available as supplemental PDF files at N-S site. You'd simply have to agree that he's not following the pretinent details at all.
Again, not saying there won't be any problems found, just saying we should wait for completion of official review, by folks who know how to do it.
Silly Me
by folks who know how to do it.
Oh yeah...I forgot that I should trust my government over a concerned citizen. What was I thinking?
's funny
"...we should wait for completion of official review, by folks who know how to do it."
Private citizens ought to know their place isn't to ask to see their government's records or try to do their own inquiries into government practices or, you know, try to hold their government accountable for, you know, stuff.
'Cause the government has people who do that for them...
;}
What Happened While They Waited for An Official Review
Can you believe the nerve of these nutcases? Didn't they know they should trust their government?
(link...)
Independence better assured now
Ah, Bizzy--I'm sure we share a pride in the participants at the Boston Tea Party.
But seriously, earlier on, I took exception to Walls bumpin' around down there by himself, too, if you'll recall.
Personally, I feel a lot more confident of what the audit process will be, now that the Comptroller's Office is also in the loop. Seems to me to better assure an independent review, don't you think?
The Audit
If I were an apologist for Ragsdale, I'd argue "Let the audit take its course," hoping this all somehow blows over if stretched out.
But this is American, and East Tennessee by the grace of God, and nobody around here much likes or trusts government.
It's OUR government and OUR money. You go, Lewis Cosby! I hope you're joined next week by 10 more folks digging through receipts and checkbooks. -- s.
It's OUR government and OUR
It's OUR government and OUR money. You go, Lewis Cosby! I hope you're joined next week by 10 more folks digging through receipts and checkbooks.
I like Cosby’s hard hitting style, but it would be nice to hear this…And then we are going to go to the Sheriff’s Departement and dig into the drug fund! Then over to the Register of Deeds office, and next stop is the County Commission….YEEEEEEAAAAAAA!!
You know its a little bit
You know its a little bit flip to say I'm sure we share a pride in the participants at the Boston Tea Party.
At what point do we as modern day citizens say "Enough!" to having our government waste our money. What is our recourse? There's an old saying "Mind your pennies and the dollars will take care of themselves." (Folksy, I know). This is exactly what's happening not just in Knox county, but in Tennessee and the United States. Nobody's minding the pennies.
Here's the thing. I don't have Smoothies for breakfast or lobster for lunch.I have toast and pack my lunch. If I have a party I pay for the liquor. If my company decides to give me a company car they won't also pay a car allowance. I don't have a heated closet like Shumaker. If I get fired or quit I don't get to stick around until I am vested. I don't have people on my company's payroll who do my personal errands like Harbor and probably Witt did for Ragsdale. If I did I would get fired. If I need to take family leave I don't get paid. Am I leaving anything out?
Doesn't anyone stop to think how this wastefulness makes the average working person feel? Maybe it makes us feel like throwing something in the harbor. Oh and yes, remembering that great symbolic act does make me proud.
Ok, here's my thing. I'm
Ok, here's my thing. I'm thrilled to have the public paying attention to government. I wish they'd do it all the time and not just when there's a big scandal at hand.
I applaud Mr. Cosby for taking the time to wade through records and see for himself what's been going on. But I also applaud Tamara for taking the time to think through the details of the issues, and share her thoughts with us. It seems to me that they are two sides of the same coin. I don't see how you can consider Mr. Cosby a big hero for using his skills to do an analysis and form an opinion, and Tamara a goat for doing the same thing.
God knows I think something is rotten on the 6th floor, and I want something done about it. But I agree with Tamara that taking the time to understand exactly where the smell is coming from is a good thing.
"I don't see how you can
"I don't see how you can consider Mr. Cosby a big hero for using his skills to do an analysis and form an opinion, and Tamara a goat for doing the same thing."
I'm not aware that Lewis Cosby has been calling Tamara Shepherd names, questioning her sanity, or denigrating her in any other way. Her tone and the attitude that she is conveying are mostly what's getting her criticized.
the thing about an audit report
is that is comes from a small, but representative, sample of transactions and accounts. The troublesome p-card charges and missing statements go back to 2004 and, if I recall correctly, WERE mentioned in previous audit reports, but NOTHING WAS DONE about the practices!!!
I do believe it takes a microscopic examination (i.e., Mr Cosby's posts) to get our attention about the SCOPE of misdeeds going on in Rags admin.
I don't believe that making some grammatical errors or not translating technical issues into prose are evidence of being illiterate, or that being willing to tilt at windmills makes one a nutcase.
competent
I believe Lewis Cosby is still the same competent individual that he was when he audited the company I worked for in the 1980's.
I'm a CPA, and most of my professional experience has been as an auditor.
Okay, so he's not much of a proofreader/editor. But it seems to me that his analytical skills are still excellent. And some of the best CPA's I've worked with over the last 30 years weren't the best at drafting an audit report. Didn't mean that the work was shabby, and usually it meant just the contrary. Even with the typos in Lewis' correspondence, I found what he wrote easy to understand and his point came across.
Not only is Lewis a reasonable, smart guy but he's also someone who left accounting in the late 1980's to follow his passion... tv. He was extremely successful in both his accounting career and his career as a television executive.
And for those of you in my biz, we know that internal controls are management's responsibility. I think Lewis is absolutely on target when he addresses his concerns directly to Ragsdale.
Cosby
Although he says otherwise, I think that Cosby has an agenda. But, he doesn't claim that he's done a true "audit," and he hasn't. He is coming forth as a citizen, not an auditor. A citizen with an agenda, I think, but I also believe that what he is presenting is based on more facts and investigation than most "delegations to be heard" at County Commission.
He offered Ragsdale a chance to answer his questions (questions that seem quite reasonable under the circumstances). Even though there probably is some merit to Vandevate's reply that some of his questions will require research time, I think that the overall tone of the mayor's message was, "screw you, Lewis."
The questions that Cosby asks, for whatever reason, are reasonable for a citizen to ask, and are worthy of answers from the mayor. But, I also believe that the timing of Cosby's appearance before the County Commission to present his findings (before the official audit results are released) seem to be based on somebody's agenda mores than a true desire to get to the heart of the matter. But, they're still reasonable questions to ask.
From everything I've seen, it appears that shoddy bookkeeping is the nicest way to portray what has been going on in the mayor's office. The trend is far too broad to be attributable to carelessness, in my opinion. But Lewis Cosby's appearance at the County Commission meeting on Monday, whatever his motives, is just one more example that the sharks are circling, and if the mayor's office can't do one hell of a lot better than it has been doing in explaining things, it's just a matter of time before the administration collapses under the weight of its own feeble excuses.
sp
I don't know Cosby, and I
I don't know Cosby, and I don't know Tamara Shepherd, but she's dinging him for not being an active CPA (among other things).
Tamara, are you an active CPA? Do you have a bachelor's degree? Is it in accounting?
Re: Louis Cosby
I didn’t have time to reply to Tamara this morning; I respond now knowing that I might be repeating what others may have posted.
Tamara, Cosby specifically states, “I have not performed an audit as we accountants understand those terms.” You, however, erroneously continue to refer to his review of selected files as an audit, yet you state, “It is Cosby who implies that he has conducted an audit of the county, not me.”
And, you continue to put Cosby down because he retired from public accounting 20 years ago. You ignore, however, that he has started several private businesses during those 20 years; businesses that I would suspect have moved beyond pegboard accounting systems and have progressed to computer based accounting systems.
In his letter to County Commission, Cosby states that he continues to be a licensed, inactive CPA. I find nothing in your resume that indicates that you have Cosby’s training or experience as an auditor. As a CPA once explained to me, auditing is simply a matter of looking at an accounting entry and decided whether it correctly reflects the transaction and complies with established policies.
In Cosby’s review, he looked at individual transaction – and yes, I feel confident that he looked at 100% of the disbursements he selected to review as opposed to reviewing a sample; you took my statement out of context. He than decided whether there was adequate documentation, incomplete documentation, or missing documentation and whether they appeared reasonable in accordance with published policies. That’s what the pre-audit staff should have done and what Walls and the state auditors should be doing.
Looking at Cosby’s review from a positive viewpoint, which you apparently refuse to do, he has provided Ragsdale and Finch with the opportunity to correct the deficiencies he found before the state auditors arrive on the scene.
As for the agreement with the Comptroller’s office, the following is quoted from as News-Sentinel article published August 9, 2008:
Re: Review of Hospitality Fund Procedures
In an earlier post, Tamara asks that we think through the Hospitality Fund Procedures with her. I have and I disagree.
In my opinion, the intent of TCA section referenced by Creekmore in regard to restricted gifts is that County Commission vote to accept the gift and the related conditions and restrictions prior to the receipt of the gift. An after-the-fact resolution to accept all gifts, in my opinion, does not comply with the intent of the code.
In regard to unrestricted gifts, the intent is that the gifts become part of the general fund to be budgeted without regard to the source. There is no requirement that unrestricted gifts be budgeted as individual line items as Tamara suggests.
Cutting to the basics without assigning culpability for error, I am curious to know what evidence Tamara might have that leads her to believe that unrestricted gifts were in fact credited to the hospitality fund.
Paging Scott Bacon
Scott Bacon or Russ Oaks can comment, but I don't think Partners In Education accepts money. Instead, it is funded by KCS to coordinate donors who contribute directly to schools.
PIE has done tremendous work to build community support for Knox County Schools. It in no way can be compared to Ragsdale's slush fund(s). Somehow I can't see Scott and Russ and Mary Kerr buying bags of booze with PIE funds. Just can't see it. -- s.