Fri
Aug 3 2007
05:04 pm
By: Sandra Clark

Reporters Larry Van Guilder and Betty Bean have developed a bombshell story for Monday's Shopper-News (online Sunday evening at (link...)) -- problem is, everybody and their dog will know about it before then.

But just to keep your enthusiasm whetted, TYLER HARBER's BAAAAAACK! - s.

Topics:
rocketsquirrel's picture

why link

to something that's not there?

Rachel's picture

I think you have to wait

I think you have to wait till Sunday evening.

Sandra Clark's picture

(sigh)

Larry's week's work is slip sliding away because we don't reach homes until Monday. Am just trying to say he had it first w/o seeming to whine. Life's tough. -- s.

Pickens's picture

Politics Knox County

while surfing tonight, sounded like Larry called in to Politics Knox County and was discussing it.

Though I didn't hear the whole thing, from what little I heard, sounds like Ragsdale paid Tyler Harbor with county funds to do something that was contrary to the charter.

Bbeanster's picture

I guess VandeVate is worth

I guess VandeVate is worth his six figure salary, eh?

He's blown more fog across this blog than I've seen all week in San Francisco, including the low-flying cloud we just drove through on the way home from a most excellent breakfast

Please let me know if any of y'all actually believe that a $28,000-a-year, 22-year-old poli sci major/ ankle bracelet monitor snookered the Brain Trust into giving him $10,000, because I heard about some gold bars for sale cheap down in Chinatown that I'll be happy to buy up for you. We'll make a killing!

Sheesh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CL's picture

I missed the first couple of

I missed the first couple of minutes but Larry was their only caller tonight. Lloyd Daugherty was on it and, again, called for Ragsdale resignation.

Sandra Clark's picture

Van Guilder

Larry is an accountant who discovered the newspaper business just this year. He's done a super job covering county government and we're very proud of him. -- s.

Sam's picture

Larry is an accountant who

Larry is an accountant who discovered the newspaper business just this year. He's done a super job covering county government and we're very proud of him. -- s.

I want to Thank The reporters of the HallShopper. They have done a wonderful job and it's my believe if they had not step in and started the ball rolling with the County Confidences series the KNS, or Wate or Wbir would have never dug into the dirt in the Mayor Office.

It gets deeper with each new discovery. I am proud to have Sandra,Betty and Larry looking out for us. I was surprise to read that Larry does not have a journalist back ground. He does a wonderful job. He is the first thing I look for in the Shopper.

CBT's picture

The Mayor has once again

The Mayor has once again tried to throw Tyler under the bus. Interesting that Van De Vate says it's ridiculous to think the Mayor approved this purchase order, it's not just 'done at this level'. Uh, Dwight, how many county employees accompanied the Mayor to dozens of events, often drove the Mayor to work and was part of everything the Mayor did politically. It's not as if TH was some unknown employee out there.

If you want to see more, check out Franklin's Printing. That's where Tyler funneled all of NPS and Ragsdale political work. Tyler had his problems, some self-created and some due to Ragsdale and Arms. He shouldn't have been getting into my personal computer and collecting and reading my personal email (which I's certain he shared with Arms and Ragsdale).

bill young's picture

I agree with sam

I go to gossip & lies first.

Sam's picture

Here is more on the Ragsdale's saga

From this morning KNS

(link...)

I waiting for the shopper to come out.

rikki's picture

smoke bomb

$10,000 for 10,000 6-page, color brochures does not sound unreasonable. That's a pretty good price, actually. Seems more like NPS was used to keep the cost under the bid-solicitation limit than to put any money in Harber's pocket. If that's all there is to this story, it's hardly a bombshell.

Rachel's picture

Previous post deleted due to

Previous post deleted due to the fact that I wasn't making sense.

rikki's picture

fold, staple, stamp

Yeah, I guess I'm thinking about the costs of doing a 10,000 piece mailing with postage included, but these were probably not mailed. Still, depending on the exact specs and whether there were writers and editors and PR types and designers paid for the content, it's not obvious that cost is unreasonable.

Of course, funneling the money through NPS is hinky, but we already know Rasgdale was employing Harber illegally. That should have been investigated long ago. If Nichols did not want to pursue it then, this brochure hardly seems like enough to make him reconsider.

PS. Hey! You can't delete while I'm replying!

Rachel's picture

Sorry about the delete. The

Sorry about the delete. The $2k I mentioned for the brochures was strictly for printing. We got the design services donated - although I don't think that would have amounted to $8k.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

"Sponsor" shouldn't bill any amount to county/city

It seems to me that the price of the brochure is less at issue here than is the question of whether NPS was a "sponsor" of or a "contractor" for the event. Van de Vate says that they were a sponsor, but Ferrar does not say whether NPS's name appeared as a sponsor on the brochure (I don't recall seeing it, and I think I would have noticed).

Implicit in any sponsorship arrangement is the idea that the sponsor absorbs some level of costs for hosting the event. Therefore, it doesn't make sense to me that this alleged sponsor billed the county/city for *any* amount of cost incurred.

If you have a copy of the County Charter, the applicable section defining Conflict of Interest is Section 8.08, Items A and B. As Owings says in the story, local law assigns potential culpability to Harber, not Ragsdale, if Harber was, in fact, a county contractor on this project.

If Harber was not a contractor, I'm afraid Van de Vate needs to explain why he was paid any amount at all.

R. Neal's picture

I was thinking the same

I was thinking the same thing. In fact, I'd like to know where I can get 6-page color brochures printed for $1 each.

Sandra Clark's picture

Postage

I was thinking the same thing. In fact, I'd like to know where I can get 6-page color brochures printed for $1 each.

Randy: According to Larry's research, the $9,995.20 from Knox County to National Public Strategies was marked "postage."

Obviously leaves a followup thread for us to get beat on next week -- Did the county pay additional money for "printing" on these brochures? Don't know.

Politically, though, did you notice how Team Ragsdale tossed Haslam under the bus by saying the city paid for half of the cost, leaving the county paying $4,995.20 -- under the need to bid limit? I can assure you that the city check went directly to the Knox County Trustee. The full $9,995.20 went from Knox County to NPS and that means the county violated the Charter.

Tyler Harber only TOOK the money. He didn't write the check! -- s.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

Harber not too smart

"Tyler Harber only TOOK the money. He didn't write the check!"

Sandra, the local conflict of interest law speaks to an inability to profit from one's county employment.

If a determination is made that Harber was a contractor, not a sponsor, on this project (and my personal determination so far is that he *was* a contractor), it is still he who profited, not Ragsdale. It is he, then, who would pay any penalty--so he'd be really, really smart to shut up.

This local conflict of interest law doesn't touch Ragsdale. Please don't shoot the messenger...

Bbeanster's picture

Tamara, how many of those

Tamara, how many of those gold bars can I sign you up for? You'll be farting through silk.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

Not this section of charter

Honestly, Betty. I've said twice here that it sounds to me like Harber was a contractor, not a sponsor.

I've directed readers to the applicable section of the charter that says it's illegal for Harber to have served as a contractor (and, as a personal matter, I read that section in full).

Personally, I agree with you that another county employee extending this sort of contract should also have some culpability, and maybe in some other section of the charter or state code, he (Ragsdale) does.

But the fact remains that the section of the charter quoted in today's paper is NOT one that would attach any culpability in this transaction to the party extending the contract, and Owings says so, too. That's it, that's all.

(Gone to shop my "tax free weekend," now.)

Sandra Clark's picture

Reporters

should be cynics at some level, and the cynic in me asks WHO benefited from $10,000 going into Tyler Harber's political operations account?

Tyler already had a county salary (and probably a car and P-Card). He was barely 20 years old.

He dabbled in Republican primaries (Woodson/Stokes comes to mind) to help Ragsdale gain allies and eliminate those who might stand in his way in a race for governor.

Whoever in Suite 615 that authorized this no-bid contract to Tyler's company committed more than an ethical lapse. -- s.

rocketsquirrel's picture

editorial choice

Sandra, nothing other than your own editorial policy prevents you from updating your web site more than once a week. on breaking stories, you can update the site as much as you want. Seems like an opportunity to offer your advertisers another niche to have ad placement next to your online breaking news.

Sandra Clark's picture

Thanks, Squirrel

Great idea. Want to volunteer for the graveyard shift? --s.

Sandra Clark's picture

Thanks, Squirrel

Great idea. Want to volunteer for the graveyard shift? --s.

StaceyDiamond's picture

scoop

Did the KNS scoop Betty? Anyway, this is very interesting and good info to know. Things might be different if people knew this 2 years ago before the mayoral election.

Pickens's picture

So Sandra Clark, if that was

So Sandra Clark, if that was all for postage, where did the "extra" go? Reading between the lines (and possibly being wrong) did it go to someone's campaign that Tyler was working on?

Sandra Clark's picture

Not prepared

to say that ... but you've got to wonder why they didn't simply pay a printer and the Post Office? Why run the money through Tyler's company at all?

Randy Nichols has treated the Tyler Harber saga as simply a bunch of Republicans fighting amongst themselves, but it was more than that. It was an illegal use of county resources to further the political agenda of Mike Ragsdale.

Chad Tindell was a victim and he's a lawyer. What say ye, Chad?

Rachel's picture

but you've got to wonder why

but you've got to wonder why they didn't simply pay a printer and the Post Office? Why run the money through Tyler's company at all?

That's the $64k (or $10k) question.

knoxvegas99's picture

Sick and tired of Rags-colored glasses

(Edited - where's my proofreader when I need him?)

Allow me to weigh in briefly. Anyone with a recently tested IQ score in three digits who does not see that Ragsdale was in this up to his eyeballs needs to demand a recount, and the Law Director's read on the statute in question leaves me wondering - among other things - how in hell are ouster procedings to be initiated against Tyler Harber? BTW, for the curious, I refer you to T.C.A. §§ 8-47-101 through 8-47-126. Digest that turgid prose, then get back to me when you can explain the Mayor's lack of culpability in this transaction. I warn you in advance that modeling your response on the pap that came from Dwight's office yesterday afternoon ain't gonna cut it.

The KNS "story" this morning can be excused for not taking an editorial position on the grounds that it was "straight news" reporting, but even that designation is questionable, since the story was filtered through Dwight's prism and plain got it wrong, as Sandra Clark points out above. The Mayor's apologists need to remove their Rags-colored glasses, own up to their intellectual spinelessness and spend some time in pursuit of a goal that will really move this county forward - wholesale removal of the occupants of Suite 615.

The PR gurus can weave as much camouflage material as their hearts desire. I, for one, am not persuaded, and - in Knox County - I am legion.

Larry Van Guilder

Sam's picture

The Mayor's apologists need

The Mayor's apologists need to remove their Rags-colored glasses, own up to their intellectual spinelessness and spend some time in pursuit of a goal that will really move this county forward - wholesale removal of the occupants of Suite 615.

I agree with you.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

To Larry (et al)

Back from "tax free shopping." Larry, either I'm not being very clear, or you're not listening/reading very closely...

First, it's not a "statute" that Ferrar quoted in today's N-S, it's Section 8.08, Items A and B, from the County Charter. This section would, as Owings said (and as I agreed on reading it), find Harber culpable of conflict of interest for having benefited *financially* from a county contract or purchase while he was a county employee. This section does not sanction a county employee (like Ragsdale) who might have benefited *politically* from such a contract or purchase. Therefore, no discussion of WHETHER Ragsdale benefited politically from the contract or purchase is even relevant to understanding this section.

Second, ouster proceedings are guided by statute (TCA 8-47-101 through 127, that you directed readers to), not by the county charter.

Third, how the law director interprets the county charter has no bearing on a citizen's ability to petition for ouster. Neither does how the law director interprets the ouster-related statues have any bearing on a citizen's ability to petition for ouster, as his role in an action of that sort would be to defend the official subject to ouster, not the citizen making the attempt.

Fourth, if you read the statutes to which you referred readers, then you know that ANY citizen, including you, may bring a petition for ouster before the Chancery Court by filing a complaint as a relator (TCA 8-47-110 & 111), in which case the district attorney MUST, under the law, appear in court with you, on your side, at your table.

What I believe or don't believe about Ragsdale's veracity doesn't even enter into my understanding of the applicable law. So, if you believe that the law allows you to bring an ouster petiton at this juncture, relying on just your suspicions that Ragsdale benefitted politically in a matter on which the statute of limitations has (likely) run out, and you'd like to bring that action before a county audit is completed, hell, jump in. You, Betty, and Sandra can ante up $200 apiece and, boom, it's filed.

But on the basis of my understanding of the applicable law, and on the basis of what is definitively known at this juncture about Ragsdale's transgressions, I think you'd be out $600 total.

And I ask you to recall that I have some personal experience in filing such a suit as a relator to the DA.

Here's the full text of the "ouster law," nevertheless: (link...)

(Click on "Tennessee Code" folder, click on "Title 8-Public Officers & Employees" folder, click on "Chapter 47-Removal of Officers, click on each applicable section, 101-127)

Joe Taylor's picture

Once Again Different Day Same Story

Once again different day same story... when is Ragsdale going to resign... his adminstration is the most corrupt government I think I have ever seen...

Ragsdale do Knox County a favor and resign so our county can once again move forward...

CBT's picture

Chad Tindell was a victim

Chad Tindell was a victim and he's a lawyer. What say ye, Chad?

I have a different perspective on this topic than most on this blog, for a few reasons. One, unlike most all of you, I've known Tyler Harber since he first became involved in politics. That would have been in the 2000 Presidential race. I was Bush-Cheney treasurer. Tyler worked in the office, put up signs and did just about anything anyone asked him to. He was just out of high school, made a lot of friends in the campaign, was keenly interested in politics and thus began a career of sorts.

Over the next few years, I had the chance to work with Tyler on a number of projects. Frankly, I learned some hard lessons. Tyler helped me in some ways, but I just couldn't depend on him. He was actively involved in political races and specifically Mayor Ragsdale's political agenda. Tyler liked to brag and I'm sure his responsibilities with Ragsdale's office were exaggerated. But, Tyler was beside Ragsdale at almost every public event, worked on various projects (powerpoints for key speeches, graphics, mailings, etc.). Everyone knew (and Tyler would tell you) that was his job. As far as I know, he did nothing in whatever county job he was given. He had business cards with Knox Co. Mayor's office info., showing his title as "Special Assistant to the Knox County Mayor". He gave these out freely. So, Tyler was not some campaign worker who ended up getting a county job. He was with Ragsdale and Arms almost daily.

Tyler would do anything Ragsdale or Arms asked him to do. Anything. In the end, that cost him. When Ragsdale called me to tell me he had copies of my personal emails, I don't think it ever entered his mind that I would go to law enforcement. To me, getting into my personal email crossed a line. I had supported Ragsdale (he even married my wife and I just after he was elected) and worked with Tyler at various times (much less so over the year or two prior to discovering the emails were taken). When I first went to the FBI (they sent me to the Sheriff's office), I suspected Tyler had something to do with it, but I wasn't for sure. We now know it was Tyler who got my emails and delivered them to Mike Arms and the Mayor.

As for Randy Nichols, he wanted nothing to do with prosecuting Tyler Harber. I believe he is close to Arms and/or Ragsdale. He wouldn't file the charges, but told me I could. It was at that point that Arms called me, told me he had copies of my emails and would make me look bad in the newspaper if I didn't call Randy Nichols, tell him I had no intention of pressing charges and make this thing go away. I was in the middle of the race for judge and the media had consistently played all this as a political fight (despite the theft of my personal emails and the other findings in the Sheriff's investigation). So, I left it to the DA and Sheriff's office. I talked with Tim Hutchison and he understood. I also knew a complete report on the investigation would be coming out and charges at a future time were a possibility.

I believe Tyler is telling the truth in the interviews he's given since all this happened, notably to Bean in the County Confidential series. I suspect that Tyler is mad that he did everything Ragsdale and Arms asked him to do and viewed them as friends and mentors (almost to the point of being father-like figures, remember Tyler was calling Arms the whole time he was being chased by the Sheriff's officers). So, when they fired him and ran completely away from him, it was personal. The ones he thought he could always trust let him down.

So, Tyler had fault. No doubt. But, some of this was brought on by Arms and Ragsdale using a 20 year old ambitious kid.

knoxvegas99's picture

Were this not sad, it would be funny

...relying on just your suspicions that Ragsdale benefitted politically

Tamara, are you logging in from Roswell, N.M.?

Larry Van Guilder

Tamara Shepherd's picture

Ripeness

In law, they refer to it as "ripeness"--the time at which a plaintiff can confidently advance his complaint and fully assert his injury. What I'm saying is that it can't be done right now. (I'm not at all content to predict whether it can be done sometime down the road.)

If you disagree with that statement, you need to file your lawsuit immediately, that's all.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives