SECTION 1. The general assembly hereby finds that:
(1) Exposing persons to depictions of violence in video games, including sexual and heinous violence, makes those persons more likely to experience feelings of aggression, to experience a reduction of activity in the frontal lobes of the brain, and to exhibit violent antisocial or aggressive behavior;
(2) Even persons who do not commit acts of violence suffer psychological harm from prolonged exposure to violent video games; and
(3) The state has a compelling interest in preventing violent, aggressive, and antisocial behavior, and in preventing psychological or neurological harm to persons who play violent video games.
Wouldn't that same reasoning apply to watching Fox News? I think we should make watching Fox News a Class C Misdemeanor. And here's the definition of a violent video game:
(A) "Extremely violent video game" means a video game in which the range of options available to a player includes killing, maiming, dismembering, or sexually assaulting an image of a human being, if those acts are depicted in the game in a manner that does either of the following:
(i) Comes within all of the following descriptions:
(a) A reasonable person, considering the game as a whole, would find appeals to a deviant or morbid interest of persons;
(b) It is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the community as to what is suitable for persons; and
(c) It causes the game, as a whole, to lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for persons.
(ii) Enables the player to virtually inflict serious injury upon images of human beings, especially authority figures, in a manner which is especially heinous, cruel, or depraved in that it involves torture or serious physical abuse to the victim.
That sounds similar to most legal definitions of pornography (and most of it would apply to Fox News, too). It goes on to define elements such as "cruel", "depraved", and "torture". It reads like an Abu Ghraib interrogation manual.
Anyway, while I mostly agree with the sentiment, especially as it applies to kids and video games in general, I don't think violent video games should be outlawed.
It should be up to each parent to decide if they want to be good parents or not, what kind of values they want to promote, what kind of garbage they want their kids exposed to, and what kind of sociopathic behavior they want their kids to learn and emulate. (Not to be judgmental or anything.)
Adults are adults and stupid adults will do whatever stupid adults will do until their behavior manifests itself in some way harmful to another individual or society such that it has to be stopped, and only then does it become any of the state's business.
What do you think?
- Marsha, Marsha, Marsha: unlike Duncan, not afraid of constituents (4 replies)
- Louisville Point Park Eagle? (2 replies)
- Swedes confused/angered by Trump remark (5 replies)
- Traffic deaths expected to have hit troubling milestone (1 reply)
- LWV local news media forum (6 replies)
- The Great Backyard Bird Count is underway (4 replies)
- Concerns linger over future of AMSE after land transfer (1 reply)
- McCain Defends a Free Press: ‘That’s How Dictators Get Started’ (2 replies)
- Nearly one-third of TN high schoolers graduated without all course requirements in 2015 (4 replies)
- U.S. House sanctions hunting hibernating bears, wolf pups in their dens (2 replies)
- Trump's Cabinet (101 replies)
- What's Going On? An update about road and greenway projects across Blount County (2 replies)
- Feb 22 2017 - 12:00pm (3 hours 7 min ago)
- Feb 23 2017 - 6:00pm (1 day 2 hours from now)
- Feb 27 2017 - 7:00pm (5 days 3 hours from now)