So do we want to keep guns out of the hands of terrorists or do we want to "protect" the 2nd amendment?

"Yes."

____________________________

Georgia's in Florida, dumbass!

Remember that little ba***rd that tried to hold 'another' school hostage intending to kill students and faculty but he was overcome and disarmed?

No. Link? And then I will ask you about what happens if everybody starts shooting.

BTW, an anecdotal story is no way to defend a bad theory.

But all that has nothing to do with the topic- gun control to keep guns out of the hands of terrorists. I am hearing crickets!

Remember that little ba***rd that tried to hold 'another' school hostage intending to kill students and faculty but he was overcome and disarmed?

I don't remember that either. And I'm pretty sure it didn't happen, because...

2 students ran out to their respective cars, grabbed their guns

...that would've been the news frenzy du jour.

I think she is referring to the shooting at the Appalachian School of Law on Jan. 16, 2002.

Here's a link to various news stories.

http://www.thefeeddirectory.com/p/Feed-Viewer-Appalachian-School-of-Law-...

Third-year student Ted Besen crept along the side of the building toward Odighizuwa, who had just come outside from the lounge. Gross sprinted for his car, about 100 yards away, and retrieved a bulletproof vest and a 9 mm handgun. Back home in North Carolina, he’s an officer with the Grifton Police Department.

Before he did so, he heard Odighizuwa muttering: “I had to do it. I didn’t know what else to do. I had nowhere else to go.”

Jesus Christ, the guy getting a gun was a police officer and the shooter had already dropped his gun and ammo. Yeah, that is the same as normal students getting guns and going after a guy who is actively shooting.

And yes, other students tackled the guy, but again, he had already disarmed himself voluntarily and had raised his hands in the air, like he was surrendering.

The other student who got a gun, according to Wiki was Bridges, a county sheriff's deputy from Asheville, N.C. According to Wiki, the student/officers did not approach the suspect until he had been tackled.

That is one anecdote, and it hardly applies as off duty police officers were involved. Swell!

From gun nuts to anti-gun nuts, can we all agree that we need to keep guns away from victimizers who will use them to menace or kill innocent people?

The tricky part of course is how to identify those victimizers; I'm not expecting agreement about that.

Liberty and justice for all.

<
BTW, an anecdotal story is no way to defend a bad theory.
>

Hardly anecdotal, and several members of the big media went out of their way to not mention the use of a gun by a private citizen. The LA Times and the NY Times both said someone was tackled or subdued or some crap like that... the sort of dishonest reporting we've come to expect from that crew. There was at least one other case in the Northeast where something similar happened. Nope ... I don't have any links because I just got up but I'll post em later when I find them.

<
no way to defend a bad theory
>

and since the perp got his clock cleaned I don't know why you're calling it a theory.

All securirty personnel in Israel are armed. You are checked a lot and various points in your day. That's probably the only realistic answer to stop a rampage shooter.

What will the un-armed guard at the amll be able to do for you in a deranged active shooter. In Salt Lake an off duty officer stopped the assault. In all our malls and increasingly across the nation there is an movement to disarm security guards, while the general public and the incidents of public place shootings increase. Explain this move of logic??