Pants malpractice

Submitted by R. Neal on Fri, 2007/05/04 - 7:38am.

This guy is not helping the tort "reform" resistance. (Or maybe that's his point?) He should probably be removed from the bench, pants or no pants.

( categories: )

According to Daniel Berry on

According to Daniel Berry on WUOT this morning, today is "National Pantsless Day."

Shorts reform?

Shorts reform?

talidapali's picture
only if...

he can keep his "briefs" brief.

_________________________________________________________

"You can't fix stupid..." ~ Ron White"

"I never said I wasn't a brat..." ~ Talidapali

Pro se

Pro se litigants can really screw with their opponents. Of course, representing yourself is a fundamental right, but this guy is doing it because no sane lawyer would ever take an abusive case like this.

Let's hope the judge in this case is willing to use the power to make the loser pay for abusive suits.

But this is not an argument for tort reform. Facial reform, maybe!

Liberty and justice for all.

talidapali's picture
By the way...did anyone notice that the plaintiff...

in this case is an administrative law judge in Washington D.C.?

_________________________________________________________

"You can't fix stupid..." ~ Ron White"

"I never said I wasn't a brat..." ~ Talidapali

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.