|
Featured BlogadUser loginNavigationAbout KnoxViewsUpcoming events
Other KnoxViews blogs
Who's onlineThere are currently 13 users and 150 guests online.
|
News Sentinel Lawsuit and Knox County CommissionSubmitted by Mark Harmon on Mon, 2007/02/26 - 2:47pm.
Here is the item I have added to the agenda today for Knox County Commission Knox County Commission agrees to the following 1) This agreement takes the form of a consent ( categories: )
|
Free ClassifiedsLocal websites:
State websites:
Regional websites:
National websites:
Government websites:
Media websites: |
The only way to resolve this issue is through the court.
Unless the Court rules one way or the other on the violation of ANY laws these commissioners will be for ever tainted and will be ineffective in carrying out the county's business.
I personally don't believe that any violations of the Open Meetings Act took place.
The law suit is also the quickest way of any proposals offered to date that the matter can be resolved.
but that doesn't mean that he or Tinkerbell are going to appear and save me from the on-going embarrassment that is Knox County's current Commission.
If you think a lawsuit is the quickest way that the matter can be resolved, you would be better off to take up a belief in the only child who never grows up.
In fact, the lawsuit may never be resolved because if drags on past next year's election, and becomes moot as a result, which is certainly a distinct possibility.
By moot, I mean it will become an issue which legally doesn't have to be decided because subsequent events (election of new Commissioners) have made a decision pointless.
I salute the NS for having filed the lawsuit. It was like a needed electric shock to the body politic. I am not at all certain that it will ever go to trial.
one must wonder if Moore, who so adamantly wants this to go to court, understands the likelihood of this dragging on until it does become "moot". I can see him prancing around the C/C building proclaiming 'innocent until proven guilty....'; arrogant, arrogant, arrogant. Honestly, he is a lot like the child who has never grown up.
I hope the NS kicks their %J&@&**$%$@#
Personally, I *have* depended on the chancellor to take up the case pretty promptly. Are either of you thinking of some specfic reason he wouldn't? Am I missing something?
I had imagined, too, that the N-S would ask for summary judgment pretty early on in the proceedings. Your thoughts, more specifically?
Mark's thoughts are probably from a different point of view. Mine are from the perspective that I have witnessed how Scott Moore thinks/acts, so it wouldn't surprise me if he does whatever he can to delay this as long as possible in hopes of it either dying down, or until he can run for clerk in '08 which is reportedly his plan. However, my expectations of the chancellor are like yours, hoping this will being resolved sooner rather than later.
Post new comment