Wed
Jan 24 2007
08:26 pm

How Congressman Jimmy Duncan voted on the First 100 Hours Agenda legislation:

Ethics Reform Title 1, Rules: Yes
Ethics Reform Title 2, Ethics: Yes
Ethics Reform Title 3, Civility: Yes
Ethics Reform Title 4, Fiscal responsibility*: No
Ethics Reform Title 5, Misc.: No
Enhanced Intelligence Oversight: No
9/11 Commission Recommendations: No
Minimum Wage: Yes
Stem Cell Research: No
Medicare Prescription Drug Negotiation: No
College Student Relief Act: Yes
Energy Alternatives Act: No

(*Fiscal Responsibility provisions include Pay As You Go and Earmark Reform.)

S Carpenter's picture

I know I should ask this at

I know I should ask this at another site but why the NO on medicare drug prescrition negotiation?

I searched (link...) - no position papers.

R. Neal's picture

The Mrs. wondered the same

The Mrs. wondered the same thing. She says she will write Congressman Duncan tomorrow and ask.

(Why should you ask this at another site?)

S Carpenter's picture

Why should I ask at another site?

I assume it's a Republican secret because it just don't make any sense (with all due respect to Republicans).

Mrs. thanks for picking up a pencil and in advance thanks because I'm sure you'll share the Congressman's answer.

CE Petro's picture

Duncan's Legislative Update

I'll wait to see what Mrs. learns.

In the meantime, let me share. In Duncan's end of the year "legislative update" in the section for "health care," he references an article by Jayne Andrews (which I don't think I have read in full), which touts free market and no government intervention. At one point in the Andrews quote he uses, she blames Medicare, Medicaid and HMO's for the rising cost in health care. Andrews then goes on to assume "a large part of health care dollars surely must be going to their lawyers." (emphasis mine) No supporting empiracal evidence to support her assumption is included in the quote he uses.

Duncan then writes that to "reform" (read deform) health care, we need to look to HSA's and Association Health Plans, in addition to expanding the insurance industry, which according to Duncan, will create "more competition."

Shorter Duncan: it's all about the corporations.

I had put this aside to address at a later date, which I never got to. Perhaps now would be a good time.

CE Petro's picture

Links

Here are the links to Duncan's legislative Update I referred to above:
Page 3
Page 4

I still can't seem to find the article he references -- perhaps the wrong search perameters, but if anyone finds it, I'd love to see it.

mpower1952's picture

Why No on medicare drug bill

Duncan always puts corporate interests before the good of his constituents.

Before you yell, "But what about the minimum wage hike?"
It was proven during the Clinton years that a minimum wage hike does not adversely affect the economy.

Be a blessing to someone today.

bizgrrl's picture

I called Congressman

I called Congressman Duncan's office in Washington, DC. I spoke with a Legislative Assistance, Amy Westmoreland. She said the Congressman voted against the Medicare Prescription Drug Negotiation because:
1. The free enterprise system should handle pricing.
2. The Veteran's Admin has a similar program and it doesn't work, it provides them less choices.
3. There is no evidence it would lower prices.
4. He thinks they should stop government red tape to allow small businesses to manufacture drugs.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives