Wed
Dec 6 2006
02:30 pm

WHAT: Official FCC Hearing on Media Ownership
WHEN: Monday, Dec. 11, 2006, 1 p.m.
WHERE: Massey Performing Arts Center, Belmont University, 1900 Belmont Blvd, Nashville
WHO: FCC Commissioners, national and local leaders, media representatives and concerned citizens.

Related event (today):

Wednesday (today), Dec. 6, 7 p.m.
Film Screening: Before the Music Dies
The Belcourt Theatre
2102 Belcourt Avenue, Nashville

"The cornerstone of our democracy is a free and independent media that is not controlled by corporate interests," said Nell Levin, host of the Tennessee Progress Report on Radio Free Nashville. "Without this, our society is becoming one where only those with the most money are heard. This is dangerous to democracy and to the values of freedom, justice and equality. We are calling on the FCC to support a move away from media consolidation and toward policies that allow many voices to be heard."

For more info:

Stop Big Media

Before the Music Dies

Read more after the jump...

All five FCC Commissioners are expected to attend the hearing, which will feature an "open microphone" session for the public to offer testimony on a first-come, first-served basis.

"This hearing is a long overdue opportunity for the public to weigh in on the crucial decisions that shape our media," said Josh Silver, executive director of Free Press which is helping to mobilize public participation in the hearings. "Before letting Sinclair, Gannett or Clear Channel swallow up more local media outlets, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin and the other commissioners need to hear how these Big Media firms are serving - or failing to serve - local communities in Tennessee and throughout the South."

A broad-based coalition of local and national groups is urging their members to attend the hearings and testify about the impacts of media consolidation. They include the American Federation of Musicians, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), The Belcourt Theater, Center for Rural Strategies, Christian Community Broadcasters, Communications Workers of America, Consumers Union, EarthMatters Tennessee, Free Press, Mid-South Peace and Justice Center, Nashville Peace and Justice Center, Newspaper Guild-CWA, Prometheus Radio Project, Rainbow/PUSH, Tennessee Alliance for Progress, Tennessee Healthcare Campaign, Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition, Tennessee Independent Media Center, The Belcourt Theater and WRFN Radio Free Nashville.

"Healthy democracies are built on informed citizens," said Tim Marema of the Center for Rural Strategies. "Whether you are talking about a local zoning issue or national immigration policy, citizens need information to make the democratic system work. Ultimately, the decisions we reach are only as good as the accuracy, timeliness, and authenticity of the information that the public receives. But because of the concentration of media ownership, there are fewer and fewer people in the media industry who understand rural communities."

"The cornerstone of our democracy is a free and independent media that is not controlled by corporate interests," said Nell Levin, host of the Tennessee Progress Report on Radio Free Nashville. "Without this, our society is becoming one where only those with the most money are heard. This is dangerous to democracy and to the values of freedom, justice and equality. We are calling on the FCC to support a move away from media consolidation and toward policies that allow many voices to be heard."

The FCC is currently reviewing longstanding media ownership rules, including the prohibition on newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership -- which prevents companies from owning a television or radio station and the major daily newspaper in most markets - and limits on the number of television and radio stations a firm can own in one area.

"If you already think local newspapers and TV news provide biased coverage, just imagine how much worse things will get if the government lets your local newspaper and biggest TV station combine operations and dominate local news," said Gene Kimmelman, vice president of federal and international affairs for Consumers Union. "Tennesseans and all Americans benefit when more competition comes from independently owned news sources, and that's why it makes no sense for the government to let a few companies dominate the most important sources of local news."

In 2003, Martin joined then-Chairman Michael Powell in voting to seriously weaken these same media ownership rules. In response, millions of people contacted the FCC and Congress to oppose the changes. The Senate voted to overturn the rules, which were later tossed out in federal court -- sending the FCC back to the drawing board.

The Nashville event is the second hearing of six that Chairman Martin has pledged to hold nationwide "in diverse locations around the country to fully involve the American people." The first hearing was held in Los Angeles on Oct. 3 and attended by nearly 1,000 people who overwhelmingly opposed the possible rule changes. Unofficial hearings, attended by Commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein, have been held this year in Norfolk, Va.; Asheville, N.C.; Los Angeles; Milwaukee; Austin, Texas; Oakland, Calif.; New York City; Hyde Park, N.Y.; and Seattle.

Prior to the official hearing, there will be three workshops in Nashville discussing media policy and helping local residents prepare their testimony. The workshops will be held:

Wednesday, Dec. 6, 7 p.m.
Film Screening: Before the Music Dies
The Belcourt Theatre
2102 Belcourt Avenue, Nashville
Contact: Hannah Sassaman: 267-970-4007

Thursday, Dec. 7th, 7:30 p.m.
Nashville Peace and Justice Center
1016 18th Ave S, Nashville
Contact: Amanda Ballantyne: 612-849-0195

Saturday, Dec. 9th, 2 p.m.
Nashville Peace and Justice Center
1016 18th Ave S, Nashville
Contact: Amanda Ballantyne: 612-849-0195

Johnny Ringo's picture

Interesting

For a "free and independent media", we need more government regulation.

Andy Axel's picture

[sigh]

Anti-trust is not a new idea.

____________________________

Dirty mouth language -- it's the new black.

Johnny Ringo's picture

Didn't say that

Didn't say it was new - just anomalous. It's simply interesting to me that we panic over corporate control of the media, so we fight it by allowing government to control the media instead (i.e., FCC regulation, licensing, etc.).

Andy Axel's picture

By allowing smaller

By allowing smaller competitors a wedge in the marketplace? Stuff like LPFM? If you had your way, Johnny, pirate radio would be whisked out of existence.

This isn't about media control. It's about access to public resources (things like spectrum, e.g.).

It's also about fairly enforcing US laws on the books -- like the ones preventing majority ownership by overseas interests. Fox News shouldn't even exist under that regime. And I'm sure someone might mention the fact that we thought it was in the public interest to bust AT&T into smaller regional components, and now AT&T stands to become a de facto monopoly (that is, if the deadlock in the FCC commission is broken).

____________________________

Dirty mouth language -- it's the new black.

Johnny Ringo's picture

no...

If you had your way, Johnny, pirate radio would be whisked out of existence.

Why is pirate radio "pirate"? Isn't it because it operates in violation of FCC regulations? Sure, if I had my way everyone who wanted access to the airwaves would have to compete, and some would win and some would lose, but at least you wouldn't have some governmental entity choosing who the winners and losers are. From what it sounds like, if YOU have YOUR way, pirate radio will be "whisked out of existence" because of aggressive enfocement of the very government regulations you're taking issue with me for questioning.

It's also about fairly enforcing US laws on the books -- like the ones preventing majority ownership by overseas interests. Fox News shouldn't even exist under that regime.

Do these rules apply to cable-exclusive media content? Although the government might claim to own and have authority to regulate over the air broadcasts, I was unaware that it claimed such right over privately operated cable transmissions, for which "limited spectrum" really isn't an issue. If Fox News is violating current federal laws, surely some "public spirited" interest group would have instituted litigation to force government enforcement of those laws against Fox - has such litigation been instituted to your knowledge? If not, doesn't that suggest that Fox is operating within the bounds of law?

(CAVEAT: I claim no expertise at all in media regulation laws. Just throwing out ideas here.)

redmondkr's picture

Some time when you have

Some time when you have nothing to do and lots of time to do it, you may want to read about Edwin Armstrong. Here is a classic example of a commercial entity manipulating a government entity to squelch competition.

Frequency Modulation was one of Armstrong's many inventions. He watched as all the radios he had sold became obsolete overnight when the FCC, lobbied by a famous rival, changed the frequency allocation for FM. In utter despair he bailed out of a hotel window to his death.

Ken Burns did a wonderful documentary about the subject. Empire of the Air is available on DVD.

Eleanor A's picture

Thanks, RKR. I'm gonna put

Thanks, RKR. I'm gonna put that one on the list. But then, I'm a sucker for History-Channel-type documentaries.

____________________________

A girl with fingernails that shine like justice

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives