Use Instagram, Cede Your Copyright Forever

Tue

Dec 18 2012

06:39 pm

By: Andy Axel shortURL

Facebook just announced that photographers using their Instagram service are now basically all uncompensated stock photographers.

So if you're ever fortunate enough to have an Instagram photo that you took to be selected as the cover of Time magazine, you will never be compensated for your work, nor ever alerted that your work was used for ... well, for whatever purpose deemed suitable by Facebook, irrevocably and in perpetuity. You cede your copyright by using this service.

Oh, and there's no opt-out. Your only choice is to choose to comply or to delete your account by January 16, 2013.

(Not that I used the service that much, but I deleted my Instagram account 10 minutes ago.)

EDIT: Facebook claims it was all a misunderstanding and sought to "clarify" their policy.

Topics:

Andy Axel's blog

vote

As Slate has pointed out, the

Submitted by cwg on Tue, 2012/12/18 - 6:48pm.

As Slate has pointed out, the TOS are almost the same for Twitter and YouTube - and, probably, any number of other companies. Free apps aren't actually free.

(link...)

Information wants to be free!

Submitted by R. Neal on Tue, 2012/12/18 - 6:55pm.

Information wants to be free! /snark

That's always made me laugh

Submitted by metulj on Tue, 2012/12/18 - 7:07pm.

That's always made me laugh too. Data, maybe. Information is data passed through someone's brain, so "No."

I think users need more time

Submitted by bizgrrl on Tue, 2012/12/18 - 7:11pm.

I think users need more time to cancel their accounts.

Unfortunate Wording.

Submitted by CE Petro on Tue, 2012/12/18 - 10:15pm.

Instagram CE is doubling down...unfortunate wording

It said instead that users had incorrectly interpreted its revised terms of serviced, which it blamed on its "confusing" choice of language.

Instagram's clarification follows much user opposition to the believed change.

"To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos," it said.

Instagram chief executive Kevin Systrom said in a blog posting: "It is our mistake that this language is confusing.

"We are working on updated language in the terms to make sure this is clear."

Right. "Not our intention."

Submitted by Andy Axel on Tue, 2012/12/18 - 10:22pm.

Right. "Not our intention." Still vague, if that's what they were trying to say.

Personally, I think they were

Submitted by CE Petro on Tue, 2012/12/18 - 10:44pm.

Personally, I think they were trying to slide the stealing your copyright through on the sly. Thankfully there are vigilant people that actually read these changes, and were able to get the word out. If there wasn't' such an uproar they wouldn't have said a thing.