Blatant falsehoods, marginal literacy, smug attitude -- this is no ordinary Republican.

Anonymous' statements are in quotes, then my reply

"Hall is obviously qualified considering no judge has ever stated that term limits apply to elected officials."

Considering no judge has ever stated that term limits apply to elected officials, Emge and many others, are asking that a judge say so.

"Just think, all this time fooling around with a wide variety of attorney's and judges who are highly educated in the law but, cannot find a clear answer and Mr. Emege has had the answer all along. When is this going to end?"

When everyone is satisfied that all parties are following the law, it will end. Since the question is before the appellate courts, the resolution is closer than before.

"These people talk about coruption in county government and then turn around and try to sue over an election which was clearly not in their favor."

No one is talking about corruption, they are talking about whether the elected officials are following the law. The law is one that the people voted for but politicians decided not to follow.

Your sentence implies that going to court to ask for "clear answer" to the question is corrupt. That's where your rhetoric crosses the line from civil to ignorant (and insulting).

Regards,

S Carpenter 

I read last week that Greg McKay stated on another thread that people had 10 days to challenge the election results in ways of a lawsuit and it was too late. But i think certification of the elections does not happen until this week, so challengers that lost still have plenty of time, right? You out there Greg?