Sun
Jan 22 2012
06:45 pm
By: R. Neal

20120110-DSC_8781.jpg

We're back home from a most wonderful vacation, although we feel a little like we've been rode hard and put up wet.

As you can see from the above photo, we went about as far South as you can go in the continental U.S. in search of warm weather. It was fabulous. Thankfully, it appears we returned to 50+ January weather here, so it's not too much of a shock to the system.

So, what did we miss?

Topics:
Bird_dog's picture

the dabacle in the Trustee's office

with LVG having "no comment"... dang, he's a good reporter, too.

S Carpenter's picture

Padgett is not running for

Padgett is not running for Tindell's seat.
(link...)

Maybe he'd get some measure of Democrat Party forgiveness if he'd take a run at Campfield.

fischbobber's picture

Forgiveness

He'd get more than forgiveness, he'd get my vote and eternal gratitude.

Somebody's picture

Really? To me, this

Really? To me, this demonstrates the problem with partisan labels. Padgett ran a campaign where he really broke the boundaries of truthfulness in asserting his qualifications for office, worked hard to obfuscate simple things like what his business (the cornerstone of his alleged qualifications) actually is, and pushed the boundaries of good judgement by doing things like using his position on a nonprofit board to use the children served by the nonprofit as walking billboards for his candidacy in an MLK Day parade. He also spent most of his time trying really hard to sound like a Republican, living the private-sector bootstrap entrepreneurial dream (never mind his family political connections that enabled his very small business to live off 100% taxpayer funded contracts).

Campfield is undoubtedly a horrible excuse for a state senator, with well-documented examples of bad judgement and fragile connections with reality.

But now, just because Padgett has a D after his name, he gets a clean slate, your vote and your eternal gratitude? All that other stuff that might suggest that he would also be a poor example of a state senator gets tossed out, if he'll just run to beat the other bad politician, but who has an R after his name. Isn't that at the root of a big problem with current politics? We don't care how bad our guy is, just as long as we think he can beat the other side?

South Carolina conservative Republicans threw most of their supposed principles to the winds when they gave Newt Gingrich 40% of their votes over the weekend. Family values? No problem. Surely he wasn't lying when he claimed to have repented for his sins and asked God's forgiveness for decades of repeatedly violating just about every tenet of a social conservative's understanding of "family values." None of that matters, so long as they think Newt can take on Obama (a guy who seems to actually exemplify most of those same "family values" concepts, with a single, long-standing marriage to one woman, and making an obvious concerted effort to bring up two lovely, well-adjusted daughters).

We won't get any better at governing ourselves if we continue to prioritize beating the other side over having any expectations that "our guy" should actually be any better than "their guy."

cafkia's picture

Unfortunately, the rules

Unfortunately, the rules clearly state that you must start somewhere. But to your point specifically, let's say that I am willing to support a sane republican. Where is (s)he?

The truth is that the first goal has to be get Campfield out of there. That should have happened long enough ago that we could have a valid threat to use against the next guy. I would also point out just as I did a few minutes ago on the blab, forgiveness is not forgetness.

Finally, IRT Campfield, I think you are being unfairly narrow. Campfield is a horrible excuse for a human being. That he is in the state senate ameliorates that not one bit.

fischbobber's picture

Campfield is my Senator.

Door to door he is a charming, personable almost human type being. A regular Rick Santorum.

Padgett is a kid who screwed up badly his first time at the plate. I stand by my statement. Given the choice of the two, I'll take Padgett. At least the guy I vote for is the guy that presents himself.

We won't rebuild the party by kicking out the puppies that pee on the floor.

bizgrrl's picture

We won't rebuild the party by

We won't rebuild the party by kicking out the puppies that pee on the floor.

Heh.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

This Dem aligns with Somebody on this question. I wouldn't vote for Padgett (or Campfield) for anything.

It's true that I've had a frustrating morning of long-distance phone conversations with the Tennessee Lottery Commission and the Tennessee Student Assistance Commission concerning how it is that MY political party continues to implement rules eroding educational opportunities for high performing students so that $47 million annually in lottery revenues may instead be flushed down the toilet on behalf of that 43% of students ill-prepared for college and whom even the lottery's creator maintains should never, never have begun receiving such proceeds...

Deep breath.

Nevertheless, I tell you that--even on a good day--I would not vote for Padgett for any elective office, for all the reasons Somebody cited.

BOTH sides could stand to display more intellectual honesty these days.

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

...(never mind his family political connections that enabled his very small business to live off 100% taxpayer funded contracts).

And Padgett had no contract with Sevier County.

He just agreed with Joe Keener on a handshake to write some software that allowed personnel who knew how to do it to alter transactions after the fact in a manner that produced no audit trail, save the log of changes he would keep at his house, under the bed.

(I again refer to the 2009 Sevier County Single Audit performed by the Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury, pdf page 240. You may confirm my assertion that no contract was negotiated with the Sevier County Purchasing Department by calling them, like I did.)

Tamara Shepherd's picture

*

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice..."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives