Wed
Jul 28 2010
08:35 am

Knoxville News Sentinel:

"You're trying to sell your program to the young man coming to the university," Myers said. "If you can provide something that maybe another school you're competing with for that athlete doesn't have, then maybe that's better for you."

Maybe they should try providing a quality education.

Opinari's picture

I don't pretend to know what

I don't pretend to know what kind of education the kids are getting on the Hill these days, but...

The entire addition, adjacent to the Neyland-Thompson Sports Complex on Volunteer and Lake Loudoun boulevards, will be funded by gifts and not taxpayers, Myers said.

If my tuition or tax dollars were going for this makeover, I might have a problem with it, but is it such a big deal if the additions are being funded privately?

smalc's picture

Not a big deal in a "that's

Not a big deal in a "that's ma money" outrage, but disappointing.
That's certainly the common rallying cry, that the athletic department is independent and spending it's own money.
My response is always that maybe it should not be independently spending money.

Virgil Proudfoot's picture

This is a very popular misunderstanding.

Since funding from the state is being cut every year, UT is forced to provide more and more funding from private sources, and that is true for all of its activities, not just the sports programs. Therefore every dollar donated privately to fund yet another ultra-lavish mega-mega-sports thingie is a dollar not available for funding the History Department, the English Department, the Math Department, or the University Libraries.

If the state won't fund academics adequately using tax dollars, and private donors want mostly to fund sports, then you end up with, well, what you pretty much see on campus today. And the situation is only going to get worse, until the taxpayers or private donors decide to start funding academics. I'm not holding my breath.

michael kaplan's picture

are these tax-deductible

are these tax-deductible gifts?

Pete Discrete's picture

It's symptomatic of the university's misplaced priorities

and we're reaping the seeds of many, many misplaced leadership initiatives for university leadership.

Gone are the days when career university employees one day reached the top of the institution they loved and cherished, now the university's future has been sold to mercenaries who are there to pick up some big bucks, raise a few million, while the best and brightest across Tennessee chose to go to school anywhere but UT. At UT, by a classes second year, fully half of the freshman class is elsewhere besides enrolled at UT, the lottery dollars having run dry after a year's worth of not quite adjusting to academic requirements of college life.

Whoever the last UT guy is out of the institution formerly known as The University of Tennessee, please turn out the lights and place a bid on the former president's home on Cherokee Boulevard.

bizgrrl's picture

At UT, by a classes second

At UT, by a classes second year, fully half of the freshman class is elsewhere besides enrolled at UT

I truly do understand your sentiment and agree on most parts.
However, even years ago it was understood that many freshman would not make it past the first year. Nothing really to do with the institution of learning, just a fact of life. College is a lot different than high school. Plus, as has been through the years, freshman have large classes, possibly tvs for teaching or student teachers, thus hard to keep a young person's attention.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives