Submitted by EricLykins on Wed, 2010/03/17 - 12:46pm

“This bill does nothing to change the expectations in the market that some firms are too big to fail,” said Senator David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican who serves on the Banking Committee. “I’m disappointed that Senator Dodd has decided to abandon any sort of bipartisan approach in favor of political posturing on behalf of the Obama administration.”

This hews closely to the advice that GOP pollster Frank Luntz gave to Republicans earlier this year, which was to portray financial reform as inevitably leading to more big bank bailouts, no matter what the legislation actually says. House Republicans also used this tactic incessantly during the regulatory reform debate last year, falsely claiming that Rep. Barney Frank’s (D-MA) bill created a “permanent bailout fund.”

However, Dodd’s actual legislation tells a very different story.



continued...

Even Larry "TARP in Perpetuity" Kudlow says "Surprise, surprise. Sen. Chris Dodd’s financial-regulation proposal raises the possibility of substantial progress on the road to ending 'too big to fail' (TBTF) and bailout nation for banks and other financial institutions."

And the top GOP propagandist's messaging memo seems to be backfiring on Bailout Bob Corker:

"You must put proponents of the legislation on the defense, forcing them to attempt to justify the 'lobbyist loopholes' and exemptions placed in the bill... Highlight the exemptions. Broadcast them. Remind them, 'The legislation is filled with lobbyist loopholes that exclude certain wealthy, powerful industries from regulations.'"

like payday lenders?

56
vote
Stick's picture

CPA & Ramblings

It all comes down to the power dynamic between the consumer protection agency and the fed. If the fed dominates the organization then it will be almost totally useless. I'm not sure how an independent budget within the fed's balance sheet would work...?

Also, I'm dubious as to how far it will go toward resolving the issue of "too big to fail." The concentration of the financial industry has only been accelerated by the downturn [bailouts, failures & forced marriages], and I see no proposals to revive the old "bust the trusts" policies we so desperately require. When you add "mark to make-believe" accounting into the stew, well, it's not a question of whether it will all collapse again but a question when...

Yours Truly,
Sunshine!

Stick's picture

And you can't forget that

And you can't forget that this very weak proposal still has to make its way through the sausage grinder... er... House of Lords... er... Senate!

Yours Truly,
Sunshine!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Fill in the blank

Shortcuts



User login

Citizen Blog-O-Rama

Local Media Blogs

Local Paper

Film at 11

Wire Reports

Search KnoxViews



TN Progressive All-Stars

Nearby:

Beyond:

At large:

Government:

Media: