Submitted by reform4 on Sun, 2010/03/14 - 11:25pm

http://tfninsider.org/2010/03/11/blogging-the-social-studies-debate-iv/

The board is taking up remaining amendments on the high school world history course....Board member Cynthia Dunbar wants to change a standard having students study the impact of Enlightenment ideas on political revolutions from 1750 to the present. She wants to drop the reference to Enlightenment ideas (replacing with “the writings of”) and to Thomas Jefferson. She adds Thomas Aquinas and others. Jefferson’s ideas, she argues, were based on other political philosophers listed in the standards. We don’t buy her argument at all. Board member Bob Craig of Lubbock points out that the curriculum writers clearly wanted to students to study Enlightenment ideas and Jefferson. Could Dunbar’s problem be that Jefferson was a Deist? The board approves the amendment, taking Thomas Jefferson OUT of the world history standards.

And it could happen here.

99
vote
lovable liberal's picture

Anti-American conservatives!

Anti-American conservatives!

Russ's picture

As goes Texas, so goes the rest

And it could happen here.

That should read "will" instead of "could." Since Texas is such a large purchaser of texbooks, its state Department of Education has the effect of setting textbook standards nationwide. Get ready to see Jefferson excised from high school textbooks across the country.

Bastards.

thumbpecker's picture

can, could,...

will--i think we r beyond that now.

Andy Axel's picture

So much for the Declaration

So much for the Declaration of Independence.

Virgil Proudfoot's picture

It's time for a new model for textbook publication

University presses need to answer this challenge and create a new standard for public school textbooks, including electronic delivery to students over the internet. The trade textbook publishers should be cut out of the process entirely if they submit to this backwoods foolishness in Texas, which they show every sign of doing.

metulj's picture

As someone who has worked on

As someone who has worked on a textbook, the economy of scale that a textbook publisher has over a university press is enormous. It's a noble idea*, but the resources necessary to create a textbook outstrip what one can deliver through a univ press. The electronic delivery of texts is already underway ... by the textbook companies.

*I only use a text in my introductory classes. I do not use a text in upper-division courses.

Virgil Proudfoot's picture

Scale means less on download

The scale issue is less meaningful when it comes to downloading texts vs. printing and shipping lots of dead trees. Also, scholarly and university presses could develop a niche using marketing like: here are the missing pages for your textbooks.

metulj's picture

It isn't about printing them,

It isn't about printing them, it is about producing them. How many people work at UT Press. You can count them with your shoes on. How many people work at Wiley? Their corporate offices span two city blocks in Hoboken, NJ.

whooshe65's picture

As someone who has worked on.....

So does this mean you subscribe to this revisionist history effort in Texas?

metulj's picture

George Washington didn't cut down a cherry tree.

No.

smalc's picture

So are conservatives dropping

So are conservatives dropping their frequent assertion that the founding fathers were Christian and that this country was founded on Christian principles?

Trying a different angle to rewrite history now?

Andy Axel's picture

On second and third reading,

On second and third reading, it looks like the emphasis here is upon divorcing Jefferson from his nefarious furrin contemporaries -- and here I'm assuming the likes of Diderot, Rousseau, and Arouet. "Oh, they're already covered elsewhere!" So this looks to be more of a move to mangle the context in which Jefferson lived.

American saints can't possibly have frog-munchin' influences, after all.

bill young's picture

Jeffersonian Principal

In 1776,Jefferson was not the only Enlightenment political philosopher.But,IMO,Jefferson was the most important to world history.

Because the Declaration of Independence was the foundation of the US Constitution.And the Constitution is grounded in the abiding Jeffersonian principal:"The consent of the governed".

The study of Jeffersonian principal not only lies in Articles 1 thru 7 of the Constitution.But the evolution of the Constitution via amendment.

The Bill of Rights.
The 13th Amendment abolishing slavery.
The 15th Amendment guartanteeing blacks the right to vote.
The 17th Amendment provided for the people to elect Senators
The 19th Amendment established women's suffrage.
The 24th Amendment prohibited the poll tax.

I can not imagine how one could teach world history without the bedrock of Jeffersonian principal & how the United States has attempted to achieve that prinicipal "in order to form a more perfect union." by first the radifiction of the Constitution & the 234 year history of amendments to the Constitution.

R. Neal's picture

Thomas Jefferson: "May it be

Thomas Jefferson:

"May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the Signal of arousing men to burst the chains, under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings & security of self-government. That form which we have substituted, restores the free right to the unbounded exercise of reason and freedom of opinion. All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of god. These are grounds of hope for others."

Guess he would be a tea partier today, except maybe for all that ignorance and superstition v. science and reason and stuff. Anyway, sounds like world history to me.

Evel's picture

Prayers for Mr Jefferson

I , being a Texan... Certainly hope Texas decides to Leave Mr Jeffersons signature as it is!!

He was after all, One of our ForeFathers. and I have No respect for any political person that wants to remove His name Just because of Their opinion

thumbpecker's picture

What Texas is...

doing, the game they r playing, it done all the time. u critics just don't like the direction texas is taking it. i agree, but now u know how the rest of us feel when u do it!

lovable liberal's picture

Riiight!

The direction of further ignorance, yep, we're agin that.

EricPearson's picture

They are removing more than Thomas Jefferson in politics.

I’m a Democratic Party candidate for U.S. Congress in the 5th district of Tennessee. In spite of this, I have been denied in having my candidacy listed on the Tennessee Democratic Party web site.

Furthermore, message board postings from anyone (including myself) criticizing the policies of the National Democratic Party are deleted from the web site. Nothing is exempt from deletion if it is in opposition, and these include single quotes from the Bible, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, etc.

At the very least, many of us as Democrats are being deprived an equal voice within our own Democratic Party.

I welcome anyone to contact me in discussing this matter by the below phone number or email address.

Eric Pearson
Phone: (615) 852-7553
Email: epearson@democraticreformparty.com

Andy Axel's picture

I thought you were the

1) I thought you were the Democratic REFORM Party candidate.

So why bother with the TNDP?

2) Knoxville isn't in the 5th district, dipshit.

R. Neal's picture

Stop saying you're a

Stop saying you're a Democrat. You're not.

B Harmon's picture

Just go away

GO AWAY. Play your silly game somewhere else. I am really tired of your constant idiotic dribble.

thumbpecker's picture

why would...

ANYONE claim to be a democrat if they were not? this is a democrat party hack site and we all know that and we all expect what comes with it.

Andy Axel's picture

Because Republicans don't win

Because Republicans don't win in District 5.

lovable liberal's picture

Hard to believe for you

... but lots of people are proud not to be frothing wingnut morons.

JD Roland's picture

It's wrong, it's WRROOONGG.

Anybody who would support this is absolutely anti-american. I don't care what party it is, but in this case it happens to be the conservatives. And this is what we want in 2012? That's so much better than Obama. Revisionism of history is wrong. Our kids deserve better.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Fill in the blank

Shortcuts



User login

Citizen Blog-O-Rama

Local Media Blogs

Local Paper

Film at 11

Wire Reports

Search KnoxViews



TN Progressive All-Stars

Nearby:

Beyond:

At large:

Government:

Media: