TNDP presser:

MURFREESBORO - Another Middle Tennessee Tea Party organizer is in trouble with the Internal Revenue Service, owing more than $80,000 in unpaid taxes, according to state and federal tax liens.

"I guess we know now why Mr. Hidalgo is leading the effort to protest taxes," Tennessee Democratic Party Chairman Chip Forrester said of Christian Hidalgo, who owns a Murfreesboro-based marketing and public relations firm. "It's hard for me to understand how people who don't pay taxes think they are paying too much."

Tax records from the Rutherford County Register of Deeds show Hidalgo has been stiffing the IRS for more than a decade. He is not the only local Tea Party organizer who has been dodging tax payments, though.

Recently it was revealed that National Tea Party organizer and Williamson County Republican Michael Patrick Leahy has more than $100,000 in tax liens and court judgments filed against him.

"This kind of hypocrisy does nothing to help bring jobs to the community, build schools or improve our roads and bridges," Forrester said. "It only serves to divide people and play on our fears.

"Honest debate is one thing, but divisiveness hurts our common goals. We should do more to ensure people have good jobs at which to work, good schools to send their children and safe communities in which to live," he added.

gonzone's picture

good one

This is an admirable example of what the TNDP can do.

Hypocrisy, hypocrisy, and more hypocrisy. Thy name is GOP.

"If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?"

Anonymously Nine's picture

Oh snap

Alinsky again.

Nobody's picture

I guess this makes them

I guess this makes them qualified for a cabinet post.

NorthKnox's picture

I know a lot of folks don't

I know a lot of folks don't want to think about this story in any positive light, because anything the GOP does should be damned or anything the Dems do should likewise be damned, depending on your perspective.

The fact is -- and it's a fact conveniently left out of this release from TNDP -- that a lot of the anti-tax folks don't pay taxes out of protest. It's a form of civil disobedience. I'm not saying that's what this guy's doing. I don't know him from Adam, and I can't speak to his motives, nor can anyone else -- except with respect to verifiable actions.

All I know about this guy is that he's an anti-tax tea party organizer who owes taxes. I don't know his family, his history, etc. Based on those two nuggets of information, tax-evasion-as-protest seems plausible, but you won't hear that from the Dems, nor would you from the GOP were the tables to be turned.

Sometimes people seem to get so caught up in being open minded that they fail to realize how closed minded they've become.

Elrod's picture

Consequences

The way civil disobedience works is you PUBLICLY violate the law - e.g. refuse to pay taxes - and publicly accept the whatever punishment is thrown at you. You then use your arrest and trial as a sort of demonstration against whatever it is you are protesting. Silently refusing to pay taxes is not an act of civil disobedience. It's just fraud.

NorthKnox's picture

These tax records are

These tax records are public... might not be on TV, but it's public nonetheless.

R. Neal's picture

Yes, and those public

Yes, and those public records show that some of the liens are related to 941s. That's the form you report employee withholding on.

There's no way to know if it's his own withholding for his own income or for employees.

But not paying money that was withheld from an employee's paycheck for income tax, SSI, and payroll tax is theft from the employee as well as the government and other taxpayers. Nothing will get your business padlocked faster, and that's as it should be.

(link...)

Andy Axel's picture

that a lot of the anti-tax

that a lot of the anti-tax folks don't pay taxes out of protest. It's a form of civil disobedience.

Absolute futility.

939 F.2d 499, U.S. v. Sloan (US Court of Appeals, 7th circuit):

In upholding the federal conviction of a tax protester, the Court wrote:

The real tragedy of this case is the unconscionable waste of Mr. Sloan's time, resources, and emotion in continuing to pursue these wholly defective and unsuccessful arguments about the validity of the income tax laws of the United States. Despite our rejection of Mr. Sloan's legal analysis of the tax laws, we are not unmindful of the sincerity of his beliefs. On the other hand, we are less sure of the sincerity of the professional tax protestors who promote their views in literature and meetings to persons like Mr. Sloan, yet are unlikely ever to face the type of penalties incurred by him. It may be that our decision will not alter Mr. Sloan's views regarding the tax laws of this country, for he has stated that if we affirm his conviction without applying the law as he understands it, our decision will be "a sham to which I WILL NOT SUBMIT." It may also be that serving his sentence in prison will not alter Mr. Sloan's view. We hope this pessimistic assessment is incorrect.

See also:

Brushaber v Union Pacific Railroad, 240 U.S. 1, 17-19 (1916)

and

Schiff v Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-183

We will not countenance those who would continue to waste judicial resources by engaging in a detailed scholarly refutation of petitioner's specious claims.

Tax protestors have yet to win a single battle in court.

____________________________

Dirty deeds done dirt cheap! Special holidays, Sundays and rates!

Andy Axel's picture

More helpful reading and

More helpful reading and links:

(link...)

It's a regular Snopes page of tax dodging mythology. All of the hits are catalogued...

Myth: The filing of a tax return is voluntary

Myth: Payment of tax is voluntary

Myth: Taxpayers can reduce their federal income tax liability by filing a "zero return.”

Myth: The IRS must prepare federal tax returns for a person who fails to file

Myth: Compliance with an administrative summons issued by the IRS is voluntary

Myth: Wages, tips, and other compensation received for personal services are not income

Myth: Only foreign-source income is taxable

Myth: Federal Reserve Notes are not income

Myth: Taxpayer is not a "citizen” of the United States, thus not subject to the federal income tax laws

Myth: The "United States” consists only of the District of Columbia, federal territories, and federal enclaves

Myth: Taxpayer is not a "person” as defined by the Internal Revenue Code, thus is not subject to the federal income tax laws

Myth: The only "employees” subject to federal income tax are employees of the federal government

Myth: Taxpayers can refuse to pay income taxes on religious or moral grounds by invoking the First Amendment

Myth: Federal income taxes constitute a "taking” of property without due process of law, violating the Fifth Amendment

Myth: Taxpayers do not have to file returns or provide financial information because of the protection against self-incrimination found in the Fifth Amendment

Myth: Compelled compliance with the federal income tax laws is a form of servitude in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment

Myth: The Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was not properly ratified, thus the federal income tax laws are unconstitutional

Myth: The Sixteenth Amendment does not authorize a direct non-apportioned federal income tax on United States citizens

Myth: The Internal Revenue Service is not an agency of the United States

Myth: Taxpayers are not required to file a federal income tax return, because the instructions and regulations associated with the Form 1040 do not display an OMB control number as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act

Myth: African Americans can claim a special tax credit as reparations for slavery and other oppressive treatment

Myth: Taxpayers are entitled to a refund of the Social Security taxes paid over their lifetime

Myth: An "untaxing” package or trust provides a way of legally and permanently avoiding the obligation to file federal income tax returns and pay federal income taxes

Myth: A "corporation sole” can be established and used for the purpose of avoiding federal income taxes

Myth: Taxpayers who did not purchase and use fuel for an off-highway business can claim the fuels tax credit

Myth: A Form 1099-OID can be used as a debt payment option or the form or a purported financial instrument may be used to obtain money from the Treasury

____________________________

Dirty deeds done dirt cheap! Special holidays, Sundays and rates!

Rachel's picture

Anyone who engages in civil

Anyone who engages in civil disobedience should be willing to pay the penalty. That's part of what civil disobedience is about.

Therefore, this guy should be ok with large fines or jail time. Wanta bet he is?

NorthKnox's picture

Completely agree. Has

Completely agree. Has anyone asked him if he's willing to go to jail? Further, has anyone come to take him to jail?

Civil rights protesters were willing to go to jail for their cause. America's revolutionaries were willing to risk hanging in order to oppose the crown. I can't say whether he's willing to go to jail in order to oppose taxation. That's a question that is unanswerable unless someone tries to arrest him.

NorthKnox's picture

Wow. Great information.

Wow. Great information. The only fault is see is that someone who doesn't believe that taxation is an unconstitutional act of government would likely view any legislation or court ruling upholding said action as equally illegitimate. It's tantamount to pro-lifers using the God argument with an Atheist. If i don't believe in or give a damn about God, don't expect me to change my mind because "God says it's wrong." If I believe the government is acting unconstitutionally, don't expect me to change my mind because that same government made rules to compel me to accept what I already view as unconstitutional.

How rubber-spined must someone be to turn on their own principles and beliefs just because change is tough or "futile?" How strongly held could those principles and beliefs have possibly been in the first place.

Didn't we just elect a President on a platform of change who said change wasn't easy?

I'm not trying to advocate for these anti-tax people. The truth is I think they're mostly wacko. My point is simply that opinions completely contrary to your own can be just as well-intentioned as anyone else's.

Politcs aren't going to change anytime soon, I just cringe at the thought of anyone, especially those who vote, buying into the party line just because it's the party line -- of course, no one ever actually admits to toeing the party line.

Andy Axel's picture

If I believe the government

If I believe the government is acting unconstitutionally, don't expect me to change my mind because that same government made rules to compel me to accept what I already view as unconstitutional.

Let that be cold comfort to the "tax protestor" serving a fully Constitutional prison term for tax evasion (as the court sardonically wrote in the US v. Sloan opinion). Ah, the price of citizenship...

____________________________

Dirty deeds done dirt cheap! Special holidays, Sundays and rates!

James Calloway's picture

Interesting..

Man, I am absolutely shocked that the IRS is harassing foes of the current administration.

And absolutely shocked that Knoxviews seems to support it.

Andy Axel's picture

Total non-issue. Oppose the

Total non-issue.

Oppose the administration or not, if you owe federal income tax, you can expect to be subject to criminal penalty if you don't pay it. That applies to everyone.

____________________________

Dirty deeds done dirt cheap! Special holidays, Sundays and rates!

rikki's picture

shocked that the IRS is

shocked that the IRS is harassing foes of the current administration

The liens against Hidalgo span a decade, from 11/17/1997 to 2/28/2008, so they all predate the current administration.

I doubt anyone is shocked that you got something completely and utterly wrong.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives