Thu
Jul 13 2017
11:38 am

It seems a big sticking point is the fight to bring back "junk insurance"

Highly profitable, illusion of adequate coverage.

The revision includes a version of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz's amendment, which would allow insurers offering Obamacare plans to also offer cheaper, bare-bones policies.

New GOP health care bill could allow cheaper plans with fewer benefits

Democrats slam Cruz amendment for allowing ‘junk insurance’

Members of Congress and the Obama administration have assured us that on January 1, 2014, junk health insurance plans — which offer only the illusion of adequate coverage to the millions of Americans enrolled in them — will become a thing of the past.

Among those who clearly don’t believe those plans are headed for extinction are the insurance companies that market these highly profitable plans and the employers that buy them — primarily restaurant chains and retailers with high employee turnover.

The Staying Power of Junk Health Insurance

Stingy plans may be worse than none at all

66
like
Up Goose Creek's picture

Robocalls

For the past few months I have been getting robocalls encouraging me to buy health insurance from them. So these plans may already be out there.

My attitude is don't buy things from telemarketers but confess it seems tempting. Would any of these plans have any redeeming value if I thought I could hold off 3 years until medicare? That is if I passed all my cancer screenings.

$11,000 a year is a hella lot of routine medical care. Right now I tell myself to consider most of that as charity, as it reflects higher hospital fees for those who do get sick, and thus some contribution for the uninsured who can't get Medicaid. I'd rather contribute directly to RAM and Dr Kim, etc. Cut out all the middlemen.

jbr's picture

Major Health Care Changes in the Senate GOP Bill

The Senate bill would change that. It includes a modified version of a proposal by conservative Senators Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Mike Lee, R-Utah, that would allow insurers to sell plans that do not meet Obamacare’s regulations.

That means they don’t have to not cover “essential health benefits,” which include everything from hospitalization to maternity care. They could also deny plans to people with pre-existing conditions or charge them more based on their health.

Customers would not be able to use federal subsidies to buy these plans, which would likely have much lower premiums than other coverage, along with high deductibles. That could interest people who don’t qualify for tax credits and don’t have any immediate medical needs, but still want some limited insurance.

If you have expensive medical needs, though, you’d have to turn elsewhere.

Major Health Care Changes in the Senate GOP Bill

Rachel's picture

This means going back to 2009

This means going back to 2009 conditions, where healthy people buy junk insurance and sick people buy better insurance - which means the premiums on the latter will go up.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

style="display:block"
data-ad-format="autorelaxed"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-3296520478850753"
data-ad-slot="5999968558">

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

State News

Local .GOV

State .GOV

Wire Reports

Lost Medicaid Funding

To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

Monthly archive