I saw drawings for this about 10 months ago. They may have changed in the meantime, but what I saw looked very good.

The entire south waterfront area is already a TIF district - but that's an infrastructure TIF, with the $$ going to build City infrastructure, not to directly support development itself. I guess the Conleys could apply for an individual TIF; not sure what kind of deal the City has struck with them.

P.S. And there's still a lot of waterfront left. This is a significant development, but in no way "completes" the waterfront.

"The difficulty lies not so much in developing new ideas as in escaping from old ones." - John Maynard Keynes

This announcement is a really big step in seeing the SW Vision Plan turn into reality. There have been ongoing discussions with Mike and Kelly Conley for more than a year regarding development of the property, and the addition of Mike Stevens will provide the construction expertise to carry the project through. What's most important to me is the dual benefits perspective: the city will invest funding for public improvements that will eventually generate development worth $115 million (which includes more than the Southshore project)and generates $1.5 million per year in property taxes, while at the same time creating street improvements, a park, a riverwalk segment, and a public boat landing open to the public. This is a product of more than 2 years of community planning, and without the people who volunteered their time to attend alot of meetings, it would never have happened. Lots of details to tend to before breaking ground, but we're getting there.

Sounds risky.

Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.

It is my opinion that the Southshore Properties Residences are not attractive and would not enhance the South Knox waterfront.

I do not see why some feel it is necessary to build factory looking buildings to simulate condo conversions. Wouldn't it be nice if someone around here could be creative and original?

Also, what are the numbers regarding (new/existing) residences and (new/existing) residents as compared to green space for this area?

I know this is pretty much a done deal. Too bad. The area has so much potential and so little vision.

Factory Looking?

The stuff rising up in the rear, maybe. But the row along the river looks more like higher-end 19th century townhouses as filtered through the architect's favorite stock-window catalog (Of course, whether DuPont Circle knockoffs belong on Knoxville's waterfront is an entirely different question....)

Perhaps you would have preferred McMansions?

I happen to find the style attractive, it reminds me of Old Concord on a larger scale.

What surprised me are the numbers: $58.6M divided by 137 = an average price of $427,700. My first reaction was that's a bit of a reach, but it could say something about todays economic climate. Perhaps it's easier to sell a $500K home than a $50K home or even a $150K home because the rich are getting richer and the poor and middle class are getting 38% on their Discover card.

___________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

Of course, whether DuPont Circle knockoffs belong on Knoxville's waterfront is an entirely different question

Yes it is a good question. Should the SoKno waterfront be compared to DuPont Circle?

I wish for something different. A little creativity please. As I said before, the area has so much potential and so little vision. People are and have been paid to come up with something for the SoKno waterfront. I guess they just aren't very creative, in my opinion. They are getting the density that you might prefer. I'm not sure, does density always mean lack of creativity?

I really like the style of the former Riverside Tavern and the former visitor's center next door. To me, it suggests the old riverboat days, but modern and stylish and interesting.

I was referring to Concord TN. The way the buildings relate to the water. The Savannah waterfront is closer in scale.

building height low enough that it doesn't block the view of the Phillips Avenue folks behind them

Unfortunately this isn't the case.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

I imagine contemporary development(s) will be built at some point. Kelly Conley has said she plans to do cottage style infill on Phillips.

____________________________________
Less is the new More - Karrie Jacobs

I believe the interested parties have agreed in planning discussions to limit the height of these structures to no more than three floors and to preserve green space. The spirit of this agreement was to respect the rights of residents on Phillips Avenue who currently have river and downtown views.

The images of proposed buildings seem inaccurate, therefore, since the buildings shown behind the riverfront buildings seem to rise to heights above that. Perhaps these are only artist renderings of possible appearances, not taking into account actual plans limiting buildings to three stories.

No doubt all these improvements will benefit all who own houses and businesses in the area. What good will they'll generate as they faithfully reflect what has been solidified in public planning sessions!