Oddly enough, I haven't perused the MP issue in question.  You on the other hand, claim at various times that it is an editorial that raises your ire then, you accuse it of being sloppy reporting.  Those two things are not the same.  The words are not interchangeable.  While the editorial may have been slanted a little differently had more facts been known, given what they apparently did not know, for instance, what was in the footage not shown, it probably isn't unreasonable.

I would support the idea of an additional few column lines online or in the next issue if the additional information changes the writers viewpoint(or not).

CAFKIA

own and experienced with hand guns, rifles, shotguns, (variety of calibers and guages) multiple knives (including switchblades, butterfly, hawk billed, machete, boot, etc) and an assortment of Asian martial arts weaponry so, forget attacking me on that score. 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument.
  - William G. McAdoo

I was livid after reading that editorial in the Metro Pulse last night.

First, there was this.

"Though the car lot is in the city of Knoxville, Lambert says he called for sheriff’s deputies because he wanted “my own people” to respond.

Let’s get this down straight for Commissioner Lambert. Just because he is a county commissioner does not mean that sheriff’s officers are Lambert’s “own people.” He does not own or control the sheriff’s office. Nor should he expect special favors from that office. Besides the arrogance of the position he took on who should perform the investigation, Lambert’s explanation shows unwarranted contempt for the Knoxville Police Department."

Now, I checked kgis.org last night and, if his car lot is still beside the airplane building, it ISN'T in the City of Knoxville. It's about 500 to 1,000 ft outside the city limits.

Second, there's this whole he's a danger to Ragsdale and his people statement.

"Advice to Knox County Mayor Mike Ragsdale and members of his administration, toward whom Lambert has shown animosity: Steer clear of Lumpy Lambert unless you have armed security handy and have plenty of witnesses around."

Give me a break.

The fact that the weapon may have been unloaded actually doesn't change things that much. According to the NRA's own saftey rules, you don't point a weapon at yourself or anyone else if you don't intend to shoot. Period. Unloading it before you show it off is also a great safety precaution, but that doesn't mean you can skip the first rule. There are far too many instances of people accidentally shot with "unloaded" guns. Lumpy's bravado simply got the better of him, and he failed to follow proper saftey procedures.

That is an opportunistic editorial. The robber didn't steal anything from Lumpy, but MP did, like a gull steals from an osprey. The editorial is clearly a reaction to Lumpy's efforts to investigate Tyler Harber's county employment and not to him successfully defusing a dangerous situation and expressing mercy for the man who pulled a gun on him.

I like Lumpy, he was more entitled to pull a gun than Burchett I think. For the most part I like Market Square and the MP's reporting and even the pariahs the Wests( I wrote Scott in for state senator 7th dist), but I have DISDAIN for the MP's Market Square elitism that has seeped through their writing for around a decade. Stacey

Come on people - it was a posed picture for sensationalism. That's all. Have you ever watched a violent movie?