The morning after.

I had to look her up. It appears that since her first race ever was for that U. S. House seat in 2014, she has *less than* two years experience as an elected officeholder at any level?

And as daughter to former Florida Gov. Bob Graham, her candidacy would make for a *double* family dynasty on the Dem ticket?

What's her appeal, exactly?

Biden would sure be the best choice. He would actually be the best President. I thought earlier that Clinton would pick someone under 50 years old if she did not pick one of the two Virginia Senators Tim Kaine or Mark Warner. There are many younger Democratic women and men that are experienced, talented, and qualified.After reading about her close work with Warner while she served in the Senate, and the respect they have for each other,I thought he had the edge. Now it does appear it will probably be Kaine. Although he would not be my first choice, as I said nobody can beat Biden and Sherrod Brown would be excellent, but Tim Kaine is solid and well qualified. Kaine is a heck of a lot more qualified to be President than Trump.Clinton likely will pick someone she feels is qualified to be President now and someone she can have a good comfortable working relationship with. She is not going to make a John Kerry mistake.Clinton will be sworn in on Jan. 20, 2017 no matter who she picks as V-P and that will be a excellent way to celebrate my birthday.

I don't get the appeal of Tim Kaine, other than he's from a swing state. Won't make Bernie voters happy. Hell, won't even make ME happy.

With so many good choices, let's hope Hillary doesn't go this way.

Per HuffPo, two days ago:

Tim Kaine Calls to Deregulate Banks as He Campaigns to be Clinton's VP.

Kaine signed two letters on Monday urging federal regulators to go easy on banks ― one to help big banks dodge risk management rules, and another to help small banks avoid consumer protection standards.

I just really, really wanted to see those texts of her speeches to Wall Street. Meanwhile, "convention diseaster" is exactly right.

He would not be a bad choice.

This is pretty shallow of me but I just don't know about the ring of "Clinton, Vilsack!"

I think Warren is too valuable in the Senate

There are too many clowns in politics, but not enough comedians.

I would be OK with Corey Booker but it appears he has some dirty laundry.

I, another baby boomer, like Booker. I mentioned him as a possibility last night. I don't know if the lawsuit against him and others will hurt his chances

I don't think so... Open Secrets

Wall Street’s favorite Senate candidate in the past cycle was Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.). Booker took in nearly $2 million from Wall Street in his pair of Senate races in the past two years. The former Newark mayor is considered a friend to the bankers across the Hudson.

The noted defender of private equity garnered support from multiple hedge funds. Wall Street is just $34,000 short of being Booker’s top donor group, just after lawyers and law firms.

Goldman Sachs is sixth on Booker’s list of career donors, having contributed $59,600 to his campaigns.

He is also a shill for hedge funds who love them some charter schools.

The last thing Hillary needs, with all the accusations against her of criminal wrongdoing (notwithstanding their incorrectness) is a running mate with even more accusations of criminal and ethical breaches. Her running mate needs to be unimpeachable.

A Booker choice would flip his seat to the Republicans. We just can't afford that.

But I have to wonder if he is even on the radar as a potential choice.

Don't know yet who it's going to be, but I'm coming around on Tim Kaine. Been listening to the chit chat, and I think he'll be a good VP. Not an out of the box pick, not an exciting candidate, but a really solid Vice President. Think of him as the anti-Palin.

Not sure Clinton keeps a better secret is anything to promote.

We've had an African-American President.

Not sure why two women seems radical at this point.

And if it were Warren/Clinton I could have pulled the lever.

But, Johnson/Weld 2016.

funny you should say "not one leak" today... #DNCLeaks dropped today

not that it is really any suprise to anyone that DNC was actively working against Sanders during the primary -- perhaps in the view of New Democrats, Sanders is outside the party, so -- go figure?

of course the next question -- why now, and who does this serve? :)
surely a putin-assange-snowden-trump-rnc conspiracy, amiright? oh my!