Submitted by R. Neal on Thu, 2009/02/12 - 11:13am.

In one of the more blatant examples of irresponsible, happy talk TVA press release BS "journalism" being published by the KNS, today's business section has an article about how TVA is recycling fly ash, which it turns out is "about as toxic as dirt" according to a fly ash industry spokesman.

They fail to mention that no Kingston fly ash has been sold in more than a decade, and the only thing constructed with Kingston fly ash is Kingston fly ash retaining pond dikes that fail, creating monumental environmental and public health disasters for which no one is held accountable.

But the good news is that TVA appears to be spending one million dollars per day spreading fertilizer on the press.

RELATED: Snark.

119
vote
JaHu's picture
Why don't they use the

Why don't they use the flyash to make something benificial such as concrete

smalc's picture
Flyash can be a good

Flyash can be a good admixture in concrete, but I've personally never seen it used unless it is really needed for a specific purpose. My suspicion is that the economics aren't as good as that link claims (i.e., it is cheaper to overdesign with plain concrete than use flyash).

I know TVA used a lot of flyash in the construction of Melton Hill Dam. I knew someone who worked on the construction, he said it was TVA's first large scale use of flyash in concrete. I don't know how much they have used since.

Bottom ash can be a very good construction material for dikes and embankments. Better than naturally available soils, if used properly.

R. Neal's picture
A couple of weeks ago they

A couple of weeks ago they were saying there isn't a market for it in this economy. I guess they completely missed the housing boom of the last fifteen years or so. Also, at Kingston anyway, they would have to build a different "dry stack" storage system if I understand it correctly. And that would cost money. Probably more than one million dollars per day.

R. Neal's picture
P.S. Beneficial use was

P.S. Beneficial use was discussed previously at KnoxViews:

Link...

Also "toxic as dirt":

Link...

Also, from a 2002 environmental impact statement re. NOx scrubbers:

Link...

Existing Conditions

KIF is expected to burn between 3.2 and 4.4 million tons of coal annually through at least 2015. The coal averages 12.5% ash, therefore total ash production will range from approximately 400,000 to 550,000 tons of ash per year. The ash is collected as either fly ash, which is fine enough and light enough to be carried with the flue gas stream exiting the boiler, or as bottom ash which is coarser and heavier and falls to the bottom
of the boiler. The fly ash/bottom ash split is about 80% fly ash and 20% bottom ash.

Prior to 1989, a small dry fly ash silo was operated at KIF, and small quantities of dry fly ash were marketed and utilized in TVA construction projects. This system is no longer operational, and the plant has determined that, based on high operation and maintenance costs, it is not economical to restore and maintain this system in order to market fly ash. In 1990, TVA evaluated the cost/benefit of installation of new equipment to collect dry fly ash but determined that it was not economical based on fly ash marketing alone. Due to the absence of an operational dry fly ash collection system at
KIF, none of the fly ash has been marketed since 1990.

All fly ash and bottom ash produced at KIF is currently sluiced to the active ash pond. Bottom ash is reclaimed for use in dike construction for the two dredge cells which were developed on part of the inactive ash pond area. Periodically, fly ash is hydraulically dredged from the active ash pond into either of two active dredge cells. Decant water from the dredge cells drains by gravity back to the active ash pond for discharge. Between 320,000 to 440,000 tons of fly ash and 80,000 to 110,000 tons of bottom ash
are handled in this manner annually.

Currently, no fly ash is being marketed or utilized at KIF. A market for bottom ash is being developed in 2002 which should result in sale of about 60,000 tons of bottom ash per year for the next five to ten years. As part of this project a pyrite separation system is being installed in the bottom ash handling equipment at the plant. Pyrites and mill rejects will be segregated from the bottom ash and used in construction of dredge cell
dikes.

rikki's picture
This may be a good time to

This may be a good time to remind folks that eating dirt is a nifty way to get all sorts of sick.

JaHu's picture
Prior to 1989, a small dry

Prior to 1989, a small dry fly ash silo was operated at KIF, and small quantities of dry fly ash were marketed and utilized in TVA construction projects. This system is no longer operational, and the plant has determined that, based on high operation and maintenance costs, it is not economical to restore and maintain this system in order to market fly ash.

Doesn't something need to be done with the fly ash or isn't it just going to keep stockpiling. I'm still not totally clear on the process, but one article I read, seemed to claim that the dry stack process is lower in cost than the wet flue gas desulfurization process.

Japan began its research of using fly ash as the desulphurizer in 1985. By the end of 1988, Japan finished the industrial experiment of the technology. In 1991, the first fly ash dry FGD equipment began to work. The processing gas volume reaches 644,000Nm3/h. Its desulphurization reached 60% and it worked stably and reached the standard of the normal wet FGD. The cost of desulphurizer is low. The use of water was little so there was no need of water discharge treatment and smoke discharge reheating. The price of the equipment was 1/4 less that that of the wet FGD. The fly ash desulphurizer can be reused. As there was no pasty stock, the maintenance is easy. The equipment system is simple and reliable.

link

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

User login

Blog-O-Rama

Media Blogs

Local Paper

TV News

Wire Reports



Nearby:

Beyond:

At large:

Government:

Media: